The Truth About VAWA

The "Violence Against Women Act"

horizontal rule


"Because the principal Effect which we can desire or expect of the Action, is the Conversion . . . of the people in those Parts unto the true Worship of God and Christian Religion."







Victim awards are $18 BILLION nationally

Oregon spends $10 million per year on

This was an audit of Office of Justice Programs (OJP) grants awarded to the SDDSS under the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) Victim Assistance Formula grant program and VOCA Victim Compensation Formula grant program:
 2013-VA-GX-0016, awarded for $1,543,344
 2013-VC-GX-0020, awarded for $ 305,000
 2014-VA-GX-0012, awarded for $1,631,330
 2014-VC-GX-0027, awarded for $ 176,000
 2015-VA-GX-0070, awarded for $5,606,032
 2015-VC-GX-0055, awarded for $ 235,000

As of September 13, 2016, the SDDSS had drawn down $4,201,069 of the total grant funds awarded. Our audit concentrated on, but was not limited to, October 2012 through November 2016.

Wanetta Gibson got $750,000 EXPRESSLY for the purpose of filing a FALSE ALLEGATION of rape against Brian Banks.

Steve Avery was FALSEY convicted of rape, and his "victim" now ADMITS that she lied. It would take less than $20,000 to get such a "VICTIM" to lie in court.

Duke LaCrosse Case COULD have been caused by a payment less than $20,000.
"Cohan�s reconstruction of the scandal�s events�the night in question, the local police investigation, Duke�s actions, the lacrosse players� defense tactics, the furious campus politics�is meticulous and complete. Readers who think they know the story are in for more than one surprise, for at the heart of it are individuals whose lives were changed forever. As the scandal developed, different actors fought to control the narrative. At stake were not just the futures of the accused players, the reputation of the woman claiming she was raped, and the career of the local prosecutor, but also the venerable and carefully nurtured name of Duke University itself�the Duke brand, exceedingly valuable when competing for elite students, world-class athletes, talented professors, and the financial support of its nationally prominent, deep-pocketed alumni. The battle for power involved the Duke administration, led by its president, Richard Brodhead, a blazing academic star hired away from Yale; the Duke board of trustees, which included several titans of Wall Street; the faculty, comprising a number of outspoken critics of the lacrosse players; the athletes� parents, many of whom were well connected in Washington and New York and able�and willing�to hire expensive counsel to defend their sons; and, ultimately, the justice system of North Carolina, which took over the controversial case and rendered its judgment."

The FAKE gang rape story at the University of Virginia.
" cried UVa. gang rape pretended to be her rapist to win a boy, lawyers say
CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va.(WTVR) -- Three and a half years after an alleged brutal gang rape by fraternity members at the University of Virginia, detailed in Rolling Stone magazine, lawyers say a crush over a boy sparked the sensational article.
Readers were horrified by "A Rape on Campus" when it published online in November 2014, and the article created upheaval at the university.

SEE EARLIER: Virginia fraternity sues Rolling Stone over rape story
The 9,000-word article -- with almost as many comments at the time it was taken offline -- described how an UVa first-year student named Jackie was sexually assaulted by seven attackers during a fraternity party, and how the university failed to adequately respond."

horizontal rule


Copyright � 1999 by The Fathers' Manifesto & 2006 by The Christian Party

Please distribute freely, all portions intact.

May 4, 2006 update.

Joseph Biden, public enemy #1, whined:


"In my house, being raised with a sister and three
brothers, there was an absolute - it was a nuclear
sanction, if under any circumstances, for any reason,
no matter how justified, even self-defense - if you
ever touched your sister, not figuratively, literally.
My sister, who is my best friend, my campaign manager,
my confidante, grew up with absolute impunity in our
"In my house, being raised with a sister and three
brothers, there was an absolute - it was a nuclear
sanction, if under any circumstances, for any reason,
no matter how justified, even self-defense - if you
ever touched your sister, not figuratively, literally.
My sister, who is my best friend, my campaign manager,
my confidante, grew up with absolute impunity in our


In my household, and indeed in my entire neighborhood, had a "man" spoken like a pussy like you--we would have whupped his butt so fast he wouldn't have had time to whisper "uncle Adolf".

You know why?  Because my father, and the fathers of my friends, were military officers who, had they been like you, you would now be speaking German.  They would have invited Adolf right into your dinner table rather than bombbarding them into the stone age.  You're welcome, Joe. You're very welcome.


Joe Biden's Weird Sense of Chivalry

>Call it the Patty Hearst syndrome, in which an
>abused person comes to
>identify with his tormentor.

>Why does this matter?

>Because thanks to senator Biden's chivalry,
>taxpayers are now saddled with a
billion-dollar-a->year boondoggle called the Violence
Against Women >Act, a law that looks the other way on
female >batterers and throws men in jail when they act
in >self-defense.


Joe Biden's Weird Sense of Chivalry

May 3, 2006
by Carey Roberts

Call it senator Joseph Biden's family secret. He grew
up with a bully-sister. She didn't just boss people
around - she beat people up. Her name was Valerie. She
was Joe's younger sister.

How do we know this? Because Mr. Biden, with his usual
unblemished candor, told us. It happened during the
Senate hearings held on December 11, 1990 to probe the
problem of violence against women. This was Biden's

"In my house, being raised with a sister and three
brothers, there was an absolute - it was a nuclear
sanction, if under any circumstances, for any reason,
no matter how justified, even self-defense - if you
ever touched your sister, not figuratively, literally.
My sister, who is my best friend, my campaign manager,
my confidante, grew up with absolute impunity in our

And this was the good senator's bell-ringer: "And I
have the bruises to prove it. I mean that sincerely. I
am not exaggerating when I say that."

Most politicians who had experienced that type of
childhood trauma would be pushing for a law to protect
children from abusive female siblings. But Mr. Biden's
reaction was different -- champion a law designed to
protect women. Call it the Patty Hearst syndrome, in
which an abused person comes to identify with his

Why does this matter?

Because thanks to senator Biden's chivalry, taxpayers
are now saddled with a billion-dollar-a-year
boondoggle called the Violence Against Women Act, a
law that looks the other way on female batterers and
throws men in jail when they act in self-defense.

Twenty-some years ago, progressive-thinking men began
to kow-tow to the feminist shibboleth that patriarchy
was at the root of all of society's woes. This belief
was voiced by the eminent physician Lewis Thomas,
author of The Youngest Science: Notes of a
Medicine-Watcher, who floated this wacko proposal:

"Taking all in all, the history of human governments
suggests to me that the men of the earth have had a
long enough run at running things; their record of
folly is now so detailed and documented as to make
anyone fear the future in their hands. It is time for
a change. Put the women in charge, I say. Let us go
for a century without men voting, with women's
suffrage as the only suffrage."

Of course, we now have the record of folly when
feminists sink their talons into once-proud
organizations like the World Health Organization,
Amnesty International, and even the Girl Scouts.

Chivalry has now been transmogrified into a convoluted
line of thinking that reasons, "Yes, we must treat
women as equals, so let's enact another
affirmative-action program." Or better yet, "We've
never had a female president, so this time it's their

This inflated sense of chivalry also runs rampant in
the legal system, which operates by the unspoken code
that women who come before the court always should be
given a second chance.

You may remember Debra Lafave who was accused of
having sex with a 14-year-old student. A few weeks ago
Florida prosecutors announced their plan to drop the
case. Miss Lafave is now negotiating a lucrative book

Ladies used to express appreciation to men who
extended acts of courtesy and respect. And fortunately
most still do.

But feminists came along and did a double-cross. First
they played on men's innate sense of chivalry to enact
laws and policies that grant women unfair advantage.
Then they turned around and claimed chivalry only put
a happy-face on gender oppression.

Columnist Selwyn Duke reveals the formula: "preach
equality, accept favoritism, win with stacked decks,
pretend you had no advantage, then rub salt into the

Another version of the ruse is to claim that men and
women are equally chivalrous. Funny, I've never heard
of a female soldier who charged into a fusillade with
the blood-curdling cry, "Death before dishonor."

And some women will pretend that chivalry doesn't
exist, but never hesitate to cash in on a free dinner
from her latest heartthrob.

Back in Delaware, chivalry is alive and well. Valerie
Biden Owens, now employed at a high-powered political
consulting firm, continues as to serve as one of
senator Biden's closest political confidantes.

This past November, young Joseph "Beau" Biden, III
announced his plan to run for attorney general of
Delaware. And guess who he picked as his campaign
manager? Missy Owens, daughter of Valerie.

Joey junior is proud to operate at the behest of a
woman's machinations. As he recently announced, "We
Biden men know it's the Biden women who really run the

Like father, like son.

Carey Roberts has been published frequently in the
Washington Times,,,, Intellectual Conservative, and
elsewhere. He is a staff reporter for the New Media

horizontal rule


VAWA was fabricated completely from whole cloth. Its sponsor’s purpose is to permanently separate men and women and destroy their families.

Those responsible for drafting, inventing the "factoids" to justify, and implementing this unprovoked and unprecedented federal attack on the sanctity of the American family should be tracked down and punished like the vicious animals they are. They are a more serious threat to national security than Hitler or Hussein. The loss of life, liberty, and property attributable directly these unconscionable actions exceeds tens of thousands of lives and billions of dollars. Every shred of available data refutes any notion that this law has saved one life, prevented one act of domestic violence, or protected one woman.

An American wife is the safest woman on planet Earth. Despite philandering by a Commander in Chief who sends men into harm’s way, there is no credible threat to any American woman from any foreign enemy.

The American woman who marries almost doubles her standard of living and cuts her likelihood of being assaulted by three quarters.     Conversely, a woman who cohabits or a married woman who divorces [read: women who do not derive the benefits of marriage] experiences a similar drop in her living standard and increase her and her children’s risk of violence by up to 33 times.

An American woman is one fourth as likely to be murdered or commit suicide as a man, one twelfth as likely to die on the job, Job-related injuries by sex  and has a life expectancy five years longer. Even if such minor acts as "pushing and shoving" are included to inflate incidents of "domestic violence" by a factor of three, numerous studies show that nineteen out of twenty American wives are never subjected to domestic violence. And when domestic violence does occur that leads to injury, it is the woman who initiates the majority of it.

Table No. 340 of the 1998 Statistical Abstract of the United States, states that 3,631 females were murdered in the United States in 1996. Using 3,631 as a baseline, from Table No. 1 of the report "Murder in Families" (Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report #NCJ143498), 5.5% or 199 were wives murdered by husbands, 2.7% or 98 were mothers murdered by children, 1.6% or 58 were daughters murdered by parents, 1.3% were girls murdered by siblings, and 2.3% or 84 were girls murdered by "other". Of the remaining 86.6% or 3,144 females who were murdered by non-family members, 107 were children, leaving 3,077 women murdered by non-family members. Thus, fifteen times as many women are murdered by non-family members as wives are murdered by husbands. Clearly, the safest place a woman can be is in her home with the biological father of her children.

Per National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 9, November 10, 1998, compared to wives who are murdered by their husbands:

• 1,875 times as many women die each year from heart disease.

• 1,295 times as many die from cancer.

• 490 times as many die from cerebrovascular disease.

• 259 times as many die from pulmonary disease.

• 230 times as many die from the flu and pneumonia.

• 171 times as many die from diabetes.

• 168 times as many die from accidents.

• 72 times as many die from Alzheimer’s disease.

• 61 times as many die from septicemia (blood poisoning).

Relative to wives who were murdered by husbands, mothers murdered 7 times as many children, 17 times as many women were murdered by those other than husbands, 66 times as many men were murdered, 7 times as many men were murdered by women, 29 times as many women comitted suicide, 134 times as many men comitted suicide, non-marriage killed 1,357 as many women, auto accidents claimed 211 times as many total lives and 67 times as many women's lives, the additional lives lost solely to women drivers exceeded it by 32 times, and cancer claimed 2,711 times as many total lives and 1,876 times as many women's lives.   At a loss to society of $1 million per life for the 199 wives who were murdered, the extra economic cost of imprisoning the children of SMHs exceeded the loss to domestic violence by 1,568 times, the cost of repairing auto accidents exceeded it by 1,005 times, the cost of repairing the accidents due only to women drivers exceeded it by 152 times, and the extra money spent attempting to educate women in just one year exceeded it by 1,281 times.

Altogether, these factors alone cost 4,923 times as many lives and 4,003 times as many dollars as the annual loss to domestic violence.



Annual economic loss

Lives relative to wives killed

Cost relative to wives killed

Domestic violence-husbands murdering wives





Women murdered by others





Men murdered





Men murdered by women





Suicide by women





Suicide by men










Premature deaths of children of SMHs




Cost to Imprison 1,560,000 children of SMHs




Fatal child abuse in SMHs





Auto fatalities





Crash repair costs




Women killed in auto accidents





Accidents caused by women





Crash repair costs




Cancer deaths per year





Cancer deaths of women





Extra cost of education










By whatever standard is applied, marriage is a safe haven for American women. Based on mortality statistics compiled by the Centers for Disease Control and eleven credible scholarly studies of the lower mortality rates of both married men and women, if the 31 million divorced or never married women over age 18 had the same average overall mortality rate as married women, 62 thousand fewer per year would die  prematurely, compared to 199 married women killed by their husbands, a factor of 315. Similarly, 11,000 fewer of the 11 million widows would die each year.  Had VAWA been a program to encourage men and women to marry and to enhance marital stability, rather than to destroy families, an estimated 74 thousand fewer women and 437 thousand fewer men would die prematurely each year.

divorcekills500k.gif (12596 bytes)


Not only is the federal government incapable of reducing the number of wives murdered by husbands from 199 to even, say, 198; not only is such social engineering far beyond the scope of their Constitutional authority; not only is it totally sexist to even propose to exclude the majority of the victims of violent crime, i.e., men, from such benefits; but this legislation removes from families, churches, and local communities the ability to deal with such problems in a more humane, less socially destructive manner.

Social pathology cannot be resolved by focusing only on murder when murder is only 0.7% of all deaths. It cannot be resolved by focusing only on females when females are only a quarter of murder victims. It cannot be resolved by focusing only on domestic violence against women by husbands when they account for only 1.3% of all murder victims and less than 25% of all intimate violence. It cannot be resolved by ignoring the 12,000 men who are murdered each year, the 2.3 million men and women who die from other causes besides murder, the 511,000 men and women who could have been saved with proper action from Congress, e.g., funding research to find the underlying causes and possible cures. Yet VAWA makes each one of these impossible assumptions.   And we the people are supposed to accept that Congress did this for the sole purpose of giving feminists the opportunity to place blame on men.

What VAWA's madness does to our nation's children is even more depressing. NIS-3 shows that a married woman’s children are one tenth as likely to be physically abused; one twentieth as likely to be fatally abused, sexually abused, seriously abused, moderately abused, or emotionally abused; one thirtieth as likely to be emotionally neglected; and one fiftieth as likely to be educationally neglected, than children of single or divorced mothers.   Table 6-4 shows that 1,170 of the 1,500 children murdered in the US were murdered by women, and only 30 by biological fathers. VAWA takes children from biological fathers who are one fiftieth as likely to harm a child and places them with women who murder five times as many children as men--making those fathers objects of hate in the process.

To assert that a member of Congress does not know these simple facts, collected at great expense to the taxpayer and testified to by "the finest judicial system in the world," would be tantamount to claiming that a member of Congress is a fool. Fools don’t get elected to Congress. Fools run for office and fail. Our electoral process doesn’t allow fools to become Senators or Representatives of we the people. Congress knows these facts better than we the people know them.

They know better than us that VAWA does not, and cannot, reduce domestic violence. Congress is almost exclusively lawyers, and many of these lawyers are precisely those who witnessed firsthand the dynamics of the conflicts between husband and wife caused by such legislation. Most of them understand precisely how and why such a law can do nothing but undermine family stability. They understand exactly how interference by courts in private family matters, and such State-supported denigration of men, fattens fellow lawyers’ wallets, justifies new prisons, and counselors and psychiatrists.   They know exactly why all of them preach the feminist gospel, and how this legislation creates ever more single-mother households, and why children raised by single-mothers are most likely to need government services, and how this grows government at the expense of America’s personal savings accounts. They are more aware than the average citizen that the incessant media barrage of promises to wives to "rescue them from violent men" emboldens many women to initiate all manner of domestic violence — exactly the opposite of what it’s authors pretend it is designed to do. They are fully aware that the theory that men are more violent than women is disputed by every independent scholarly study of both men and women. Such studies report exactly the opposite of the VAWA premise — that is women are more violent in relationships than men. Congress knows that VAWA never will reduce domestic violence, and that it was never intended to.

Congress has better access to the facts than the general public, so each Congressman understands intimately that VAWA is based purely on fiction and mass hysteria. Many of them might well believe that this mass hysteria was initiated by government itself. They know better than their constituents that the notion the federal government can solve the problem of "domestic violence" is disputed by government’s well documented failure to ever solve any social problem it has undertaken, be it welfare, poverty, child abuse, education, or a host of other noble causes. They know better than the general public that the broken families caused by such legislation as VAWA causes far more harm and death to the children of divorce than the entire sum of domestic violence causes to all the parties involved.

Congress knows that the 25 million American men of marriageable age refuse to marry and take on the risk and responsibility of raising children precisely because of the draconian provisions in legislation like VAWA.   They understand precisely how such legislation makes marriage a hostile environment for any man, and they know that this left 21 million potential wives and single mothers alone at the altar, quintupling our illegitimacy rate to two out of every five childbirths. They know that a father whose family is destroyed by a divorce which was encouraged and is supported by such programs is twice as likely to die of heart disease and cancer, three times as likely to die of diabetes or an accident, four times as likely to die of respiratory disease or to commit suicide or to be murdered, and five times as likely to die of cirrhosis, than he was before his children were taken from him in the name of a cause whose terms have yet to be defined.

Congress understands precisely that VAWA was fabricated from whole cloth.

They know that if there is a violence-against-anything-act, it should be a Violence Against Families Act which severely penalizes those who take, threaten to take, or attempt to take children away from their natural fathers. They should do as the Code of Hammurabi did 3,800 years ago:

• The judge who blunders in a law case is to be expelled from his judgeship forever, and heavily fined.

• The witness who testifies falsely is to be slain.

Indeed, many crimes associated with marriage were made punishable with death in the Hammurabi Code, including:

• Adultery.

• The rape of a betrothed maiden.

• Bad conduct as a wife.

• The seduction of a daughter-in-law.

This Congress is fully aware that, rather than discouraging adulteresses as any responsible law should, VAWA sends a clear message to all wives and mothers to commit adultery at will, give birth to children not genetically linked to their husbands, call the police if their husbands dare raise their voices against them for such misdeeds, and have them imprisoned if they object.  It tells them that they can legally and stealthily rob husbands of castles, cash, cars, and kids if they will just share the booty with Congressmen's fellow lawyers.  Such a financial incentive, one that gives a woman a man’s entire life’s work with one 911 call, which promises her a lifelong stipend worth three times as much as if she joined the labor force, would turn a nun to prostitution. It is what inspired John Bauer to write:

"Anyway, it really makes little difference who says they ‘support feminists,’ or who claim to be a ‘feminist.’ What matters is who is beating you up, who isn’t chipping in the money, who doesn’t stop nagging, who lies, who thinks she is privileged and knows she has the benefit of anti-male law, who is unnaturally sexually aggressive in bed, who laughs at anti-male media, who breaks your things, who wants a loving relationship but still wants to go to singles bars with her girlfriends, who wants a loving relationship but wants to have male friends, who plans to be ‘good’ only until you’re married, who still wants the car door opened, who had you thrown in jail unfairly, who got an ex-boyfriend to kick your ass, who sexually harassed you at work by bending over in a short skirt and didn’t care, who took the job you were supposed to get, and the rest of it. These women don’t necessarily ‘support feminism,’ yet who can hardly say that this doesn’t need to be considered or talked about...except maybe a male feminist."

Consider the sheer mass hysteria created by the following statement, among many falsehoods, from the Violence Against Women Office:

"Almost 5 million American women ages 12 years and older annually were raped, robbed or assaulted or were the victim of a threatened or attempted violent crime in 1992 and 1993. Almost three-quarters of these attacks were committed by someone the victim knew."

You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to know that 1 of 30 women in this country aren’t raped or assaulted every year, or that every one of them is not raped or assaulted within three decades, as this statement implies. You don't need to know anything else about why an American man is 1,000 times more likely to be convicted of rape than a Japanese man, or an Italian man, or a Green man.  A business proposal based on such an outlandish claim would be laughed out of the office in two seconds, yet the Violence Against Women Office thrives at the expense of civil liberties and taxpayer monies, demonizing men, promoting the vilest lies, and issuing propaganda that would make a Stalinist proud.


Erin Pizzey, "When Did You Last Beat Your Wife?"


View at


Original text of VAWA.

bulletComments?  Telephone and fax 866 721 5995 and email [email protected]

John, these are all URLs regarding the VAWA of 1991, 1994, and 2000, all of which Slick Willie signed into law.

Augbo(05:41 AM) :

Let's pray that Pres. Bush Jr. doesn't follow that lead.

Augbo(05:47 AM) :

This Amicus Curiae brief contains the original statement where the fembots/feminazis get the idea that Sen. Joe Biden, VAWA Author, got his authority for this hideous act of sedition from the 14th Amendment