To characterize Durshowitz's response to Alan Keyes in this debate as "childish" would be an insult to children.  It's hard to imagine that an adult in this country would hold such childish views.  If we accept this jew's words as truthful [a true oxymoron], then he must be the first man on the boat to Madagascar.

Take five minutes to complete the Poll on Exiling Blacks

When asked the direct question: "what makes something right?", Dirshowitz gave a number of lame excuses for not answering, like "there are no simple answers", before he finally admitted "I don't know".  He went on to say that, not only does he not know what is right, but that he knows that WE don't know what's right.

Huh?  He believes that he is so much smarter than every single Christian in the country, that if he doesn't know what's right, then nobody else possibly could?  Dirshowitz is even smarter than God, and therefore nobody else in the world could possibly know what's right?  The supreme arrogance of such a statement is bad enough, but the implication is that, if Christians don't know what's right, then jews like Dirshowitz, who ADMIT that they don't even know what's right or wrong, should be the ones telling Christians what's right and wrong?!  This brilliant moral minor then followed up by calling the Holy Bible "homophobic", "racist", "sexist", and "anti-jewish".  This is blasphemy in every sense of the word, and it's the type of blasphemy which disqualifies him to practice, much less teach, law in this country.

Dirshowitz then LIED in such a convincing manner that his contribution to and continuation at Harvard MUST be SERIOUSLY questioned.    Alan Keyes was at his most brilliant when he called him on that LIE.  Dirshowitz said, and I quote:  "He [Keyes] simply has no right to tell  two adults who choose to gratify themselves in a certain way [sodomites] that they are wrong, and he has no basis for his conclusion.  What is he going to do--cite some Biblical verse?"  

Alan Keyes then challenged Dirshowitz that believing that Americans have no "right" to even speak out against ANYTHING is the very definition of totalitarianism.  If Dirshowitz had had false teeth, they would have flown across the auditorium as sputtered and LIED:   " I said no such thing", which of course was met with the first spontaneous "boos" of the entire debate.

"I said no such thing"!   For 5,000 years now, Jews have believed that they can say ANYTHING to Christians because they think they can merely deny that they ever said it.  And for 4,950 years they were just about right.  But now we have TV and radio and the internet which keep permanent RECORDS of their jew LIES.

This is EXACTLY what Dirshowitz said.  It's on video tape.  Nobody but Durtbag said it, nor could have said it!

From this point forward, what Dirshowitz says has utterly no credibility.  He doesn't know right from wrong but wishes to impose his ignorance on those who DO.  He can willy nilly say that they "simply have no right" and then claim that he never even said it.  He admitted that he knows that sodomy is a learned behavior, claimed that sodomy occurs only in private bedrooms, then ignored that sodomy is INEVITIBLE when sodomites are permitted to be around young Boy Scouts.  He misquoted George Washington, then when Keyes called him on it, he reversed himself by claiming that the New York Times misquoted Joseph LIEberman who misquoted George Washington.  He whined that the Boy Scouts is "too Christian" and "an established right wing" organization, after admitting that he was admitted to the Boy Scouts as a known JEW.   He attempted to hold Alan Keyes to the purportedly Constitutional principle of "separation of church and state" [which is not in the Constitution], criticized Thomas Jefferson as "just a man" [whose misquoted letter about separation of church and state was the issue], and then said that even if this wasn't in the Constitution that "I would add it" [read: jews can't be held to mere words, contracts, nor written statements in Constitutions and bibles because they're morally superior to the written word].  He condemned the Baptists for the statement: "women must submit gracefully" and claimed that Christians will be apologizing for that "travesty ... just as they apologized for the Inquisition and the Crusades".

It was the most supreme display of jewish arrogance this author has ever witnessed, and I've witnessd planty.  He invoked the holocaust in the name of his 40 dead relatives, to which Keyes, a black man, challenged Durtbag  to try to top slavery--a brilliant deep six to Durtbag which deflated his victimization baloon like a sharp pin.  Of course like all jews, he'll always ignore the 264 million dead WHITE Christians in Europe, many of whom are direct ancestors of the majority of the American population, who presumably gave their lives to protect the poor jews from the Nazis (another big jewish LIE). 

When booed, Dirshowitz screeched in a little girl's voice: "If you think your boos will scare me, you don't know me".  No, Durtbag, audiences don't boo people to "scare" them--they boo them to let you know how STUPID you look and sound when you get caught in a big fat LIE, right there on stage, before thousands of viewers, on VIDEO TAPE, by denying that which you just stated. 

How revealing that this little faggot expert on victimhood, who went to great lengths to make sodomy appear as nothing but a life style choice rather than the social pathology it is, would view a boo as an attack on his life or safety.  

Boo, Durtbag.  Boo, boo, boo. Sue me.