Catholic Priests: *the* AIDS Carriers
New Years' Eve 2011: ONE MILLION
DEAD sodomite priests: Hallelujah!!
"HIV prevalence among heterosexuals in these regions is a
fraction of one percent"
http://www.popcouncil.org/pdfs/wp/pgy/016.pdf
Homosexuals are 53,800 TIMES More
Likely to Die of AIDS than Heterosexuals
AIDS
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1hlPxshnRXhTmZid2xaSk5zM3c/edit?usp=sharing
Father [read: molester] John
Geoghan murdered in prison.
AIDS Capital of the WORLD: Boston.
How "Spotlight" Opened the Eyes of even
Catholics.
Pope Refuses to Apologize, God Killed Him With AIDS.
Manieri "when he woke up, [homosexual priest]
Everitt was fondling him..", was killed in jail.
The Comprehensive MYRBS Study of 3,861 High School Students
Reports
Only 0.35% of Boys "Identify as Gay" AND have had gay sex
"Three percent (3%) of all students (2% of males, 4% of females) described
themselves as gay, lesbian, or bisexual."
Of the 2% of boys who "identified" as gay or had gay sex:
-
37% identified as gay (0.74% of total)
-
63% who had gay sex did NOT identify as gay (1.26%
of total).
-
53% who "identified" as gay had never had gay sex
(0.4% of total).
-
47% who "identified" as gay DID have gay sex
(0.35% of total).
So a heterosexual boy is 3.6 times more likely than a homosexual boy to have
"gay sex" [read: raped by a homosexual pretending to be a Catholic priest] and a
girl was twice as likely as a boy to be "gay"
Priests:100% Responsible For ALL Of Our 700,000 AIDS Deaths
+steve41557
"Priests are the LEAST likely of any male population to abuse children."
Since 1985, for the last 31 years, the AIDS death rate for Boston has averaged
50 per 100,000 population, which is a total of 646,000 x 50 per 100,000 x 31 =
10,013 AIDS deaths, a US record AND a world record. With at least 284 sexually
active homosexuals pretending to be priests, this is 35 AIDS deaths per priest.
The MYRBS report itself shows that heterosexual boys are almost four times more
likely than homosexual boys to have "gay sex", suggesting that the same ratio
might apply to AIDS deaths, with 8,010 of these horrible AIDS deaths being
heterosexuals and only 2,003 being homosexuals.
If one third of the 39,600 priests in the rest of the country are just as
homosexual, and just as sexually active as the ones in Boston, then we have
13,200 priests who might have each caused 35 AIDS deaths amongst their charges,
for a grand total of 462,000 AIDS deaths across our land.
What a "coincidence" that this alone explains TWO THIRDS of the 698,219 total
AIDS deaths in the US, and MORE than the 92,613 total AIDS deaths who the CDC
reports were heterosexuals.
This ignores that if ONE THIRD were proven to be sodomites, then it's very
likely that another third were also, for a total of two thirds of the priests.
It also ignores that under our existing law, those who knew about his capital
crime and failed to report it are accomplices who often get longer prison
sentences than bank robbers who kill guards.
It also ignores that long after these sodomite priests were removed, Boston
still has a record high AIDS death rate, suggesting the problem has not just
evaporated because these priests were "punished" by being moved to the Vatican.
The Irrational Defense of SODOMITE priests
"+Chr1st1an Israel 25% of people with HIV in the U.S. are women. How do
you think they got it?
AIDS is rampant in Africa. Google AIDS in Africa and see for yourself.
You come off as a very dishonest person."
And exactly what reason would I be dishonest with you? I am simply reading and
reporting the UN AIDS data. Why don't you at least ask for the url before you
start slinging slurs?
All of the Muslim countries in Africa have had NO AIDS deaths. How do YOU
explain that?
In the event you DO want the truth, download this full report:
http://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/wp/pgy/016.pdf
The operational phrase here is "HIV prevalence among heterosexuals in
these regions is a fraction of one percent".
That means AIDS deaths amongst heterosexuals is a statistical ZERO PERCENT.
Following is the ratio of HIV to AIDS deaths by country:
World Average 32.2 million HIV / 1.6 million AIDS deaths -- 20X
Percent with HIV vs. AIDS Deaths As Percent of Population -- Ratio
Swaziland 33.4% vs 0.6% -- 56X
S Africa 19% vs 0.64% -- 30X
Zambia 17% vs. 0.35% -- 49X
Botswana 24% vs. 0.3% -- 80X
Mozambique 16% vs. 0.32% -- 50X
Gabon 8% vs. 0.16% -- 50X
Kenya 6% vs. 0.2% -- 30X
Tanzania 6.5% vs. 0.2% -- 33X
Tunisia 0.13% vs. 0%
Azerbaihan 0.11% vs. 0%
Norway 0.11% vs 0%
Fiji 0.1% vs. 0%
Pakistan 0.1% vs. 0.003% -- 33X
Korea 0.1% vs. 0.0005% -- 200X
Turkmenistan 0.1% vs. 0%
Afghanistan 0.1% vs. 0%
Banglidesh 0.1% vs. 0.0005% -- 200X
Japan 0.1% vs. 0.0004% -- 250X
Kazakhstan 0.1% vs. 0%
Australia 0.1% vs. 0%
Morocco 0.1% vs. 0.004%
Sri Lanka 0.1% vs 0.001%
Bosnia 0.1% vs. 0.002%
Egypt 0.1% vs. 0.001%
Comoros 0.1% vs. 0%
Slovakia 0.1% vs. 0%
Slovenia 0.1% vs. 0%
Algeria 0.09 vs. 0%
Finland 0.08% vs. 0.0007% -- 114X
China 0.08% vs. 0.002% -- 40X
Hungary 0.06% vs 0%
Here's how to read the data for gay-Catholic-priest-free Finland:
Finland population 5.4 million
x 0.08% = 4,320 with HIV
x 0.0007% = 38 AIDS deaths (most likely foreigners)
Of the 86 nations in Africa, ALL of the AIDS deaths are confined to the 16
nations where Catholic priests are present.
In 2011, 9,026 American women were diagnosed with HIV, NOT AIDS. With a world
average of one AIDS death per 100 HIV cases this works out to 90 of them dying
of AIDS, compared to 15,529 homosexuals, which "is a fraction of one
percent"--0.58% of all AIDS deaths to be precise.
American women dying of AIDS does get a lot of attention in our "news
media"--but it's not warranted.
+Joe Giuffre
"+Chr1st1an Israel I can't correct everything that's wrong with your post. It
would take way too long.
So I'll just pick the most dangerous one. You can get AIDS from sharing a
needle, a blood transfusion, and vaginal sex."
This is straight from the UN AIDS Report:
HIV prevalence among heterosexuals in these regions is a fraction of one
percent
You won't know it from our media mania, but if you read this report, you will
know that most states, most countries (even dirt poor Bangledesh), and even most
African countries--never had a single AIDS death.
This could not happen if AIDS can be spread by vaginal contact. IF it can be
spread by blood transfusions or needles, this would explain the other fraction
of one percent.
Not a single Muslim country has had any AIDS deaths because they execute
homosexuals immediately, long before HIV can develop into AIDS.
According to this report, the following gay-Catholic-priest-free countries have
had ZERO AIDS DEATHS.
American Samoa
Andorra
Anguilla
Antigua and Barbuda
Aruba
Bahrain
Bermuda
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bouvet Island
British Indian Ocean Territory
British Virgin Islands
Brunei Darussalam
Cape Verde.
Cayman Islands.
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling Islands)
Congo (Dem. Republic of) correction 5,210,000
Cook Islands
Cyprus
Dominica
Ethiopia
Faeroe Islands
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
French Guiana
French Polynesia
French Southern Territories and Antarctic Lands
Gibraltar
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Heard Island and McDonald Islands
Iraq
Johnston Atoll
Jordan
Kiribati
Korea (Dem. Peo. Rep. of)
Kuwait
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
Liechtenstein
Macedonia (The former Yugoslav Republic of)
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mayotte
Micronesia (Federated States of)
Midway
Monaco
Montenegro
Montserrat
Nauru
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
Niu
Norfolk Island
Northern Mariana Islands
Palau
Pitcairn Island
Puerto Rico
Reunion
Russian Federation
Saint Helena
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe(NA)200957
Saudi Arabia(NA)200957
Seychelles(NA)200957
Solomon Islands(NA)200957
Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands(NA)200957
Syrian Arab Republic
Timor Leste
Tokelau
Tonga
Turkmenistan
Turks and
Caicos Island
Tuvalu
United Arab Emirates
Vanuatu
Venezuela
Virgin Islands (U.S
Wake Island
Wallis and Futuna Islands
West Bank and Gaza
Western Sahara
Yemen
There's NO WAY for this many counties to have ZERO AIDS DEATHS if AIDS can be
spread by "vaginal sex" !
AIDS DEATH Capital Philadelphia
The most important thing which is missing from the following graph is the record
high number of AIDS *DEATHS* in Philadelphia in 1985, which was 1,121.
This conceals that between 1985 and 2015, three decades, Philadelphia, with a
total of 21,540 AIDS deaths directly attributable to the 76 infamous sodomites
pretending to be Catholic priests, had one of the highest RATE of AIDS deaths in
the WORLD, even higher than Boston (another Catholic priest conclave where more
than one third of the priests ADMITTED they sodomized boys), Brazil, and even
South Africa. It's obvious that this chart was contrived to conceal that fact,
AND to make it appear that AIDS research and drugs have been a success. But it
does show the almost inverse relationship between HIV "prevalence" and ACTUAL,
real AIDS deaths. At the height of their AIDS death epidemic (which VERY few
other cities in the world as well as in the U.S. experienced) of 1,121, HIV
"prevalence" was only 300, but in 2015 at the height of their "prevalence" of
almost 20,000, there were "only" 420 ACTUAL REAL AIDS DEATHS.
The SOLE FACTOR, which had utterly nothing to do with research or drugs, is that
AIDS had killed a majority of the AIDS victims, and thus a majority of the AIDS
carriers, which most likely included ALL of the 76 sodomites pretending to be
Catholic "priests".
How should we calculate the number of AIDS deaths per priest in the US? Should
we base it on the 58,909 priests in the US in 1975, or on the 38,275 in 2015?
How would God do it? Would He not put all the blame on the existing priests who
were accomplices to one of the most massive holocausts in recent memory--THIRTY
NINE MILLION AIDS DEATHS?
Let's do it both ways:
US AIDS deaths 658,507.
Catholic population = 64.6m of total pop 315m or 20.4%
priests 1975 = 58,909
2015 = 38,275
AIDS deaths per priest
1975 = 11.2
2015 = 17.2
http://data.unaids.org/Publications/Fact-Sheets01/mexico_en.pdf
Mexico AIDS Deaths 10,000 per year, x 26 years = 260,000 AIDS deaths
124 million Catholics out of population of 142.4, or 86.7%
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mexico-church-idUSN2429887220071224
"In a country where more than 85 percent of the population is Catholic, one
priest is expected to serve some 7,000 followers."
17,714 priests
15 AIDS deaths per priest
Brazil AIDS deaths = 278,300
Catholic population = 145,446,000 of 184,227,000, or 78.9%
Catholic priests 1975 = 56,900, 2015 = 5,608
1975 = 5 AIDS deaths per priest
2015 = 49.6 AIDS deaths per priest
Argentina AIDS deaths = 96,600
Catholic population = 34.5m of total pop 38.6m or 89.3%
priests 1975 = 13,800
2015 = 1,331
AIDS deaths per priest
1975 = 7 AIDS deaths per priest
2015 = 72 AIDS deaths per priest
South Africa AIDS deaths = 5,210,004
3.8 million Catholics of 48.8 million population
1,905 Catholic priests
2,742 AIDS deaths per priest
Congo AIDS Deaths = 5,210,000
With
29,500,000 Catholics, the Congo Ranks 11th in the world in
Catholic population
14,750 Catholic Priests
353 AIDS Deaths per priest
http://aidsvu.org/map/
+genennene
"+Chr1st1an Israel --The data does not say what you claim. The majority of
people with HIV are heterosexual. The highest risk category are IV drug users,
followed by homosexuals. And no, neither 99%, as you originally claimed, or over
90%, which you've now jumped to, are homosexual. And it is not a Christian
response
to kill all homosexuals. You are a white supremacist. You are a bigot. And you
show no signs of being a Christian."
If you were not so STUPID [read: if you had not been "educated" by Catholics]
you WOULD BE ABLE to read the thematic map which was posted before, AND YOU
WOULD STOP MISREPRESENTING THE DATA.
Here is that url again:
http://aidsvu.org/map/
And here is A DETAILED breakdown of what the AIDS data ACTUALLY says:
My once favorite city San Francisco has become a cesspool of gay sex social
engineering, with a male HIV rate of 3,713 per 100,000 population--79.1% of
which are due to male-to-male sexual contact, 16% due to male to male sexual
contact with injection drug use, 1.2% to male heterosexuals, and a whopping 3.5%
to male injection drug use. This is feminazi code for 95.1% of the AIDS deaths
in San Francisco being homosexuals, slightly lower than the worldwide average of
99% + in the UN AIDS study.
This is more than twice as high as the other gay capital (and AIDS death
capital) of the world, Boston, where 1,499 men of 100,000 population have
HIV--and where (68.3 plus 5.7% or) 74% are homosexuals, 9.2% are heterosexuals,
and 15.8% are injection drug users.
Right in line with the 78 sodomites pretending to be priests in Seattle who have
oh-so-shocked the Catholic community, the males in this area have HIV at a rate
of 729 per 100k--91.2% of whom are homosexuals, 3.8% are heterosexuals, and 3.3%
are injection drug users.
The male HIV rate in South Dakota, North Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Wyoming,
Idaho, New Hampshire, Illinois, Indiana, and Kentucky is too low to be recorded,
as it is in about half of the counties in my state of California, as well as 90%
of the counties in Montana, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin, Nevada, Utah,
and more than half the counties in Michigan, Maine, Vermont, West Virginia,
Colorado, Texas, and New Mexico. So for purposes of making a comparison, let's
use the MALE HIV rate of 97 per 100k in our capitol city of Sacramento.
Relative to Sacramento, males are:
38 times more likely to of AIDS in San Francisco
15 times more likely to die of AIDS in Boston
13 times more likely die of AIDS in Queens County, New York
10 times more likely to die of AIDS in Atlantic City, New Jersey
8 times more likely to die of AIDS in Seattle
HALF as likely to die of AIDS in Charlottesville, Eddy County, NM; Delaware
County, OK; Manitowoc, WI; Washington County, UT; Cascade County, MN;
If you just LOOK at that url, you will see that THE ONLY PLACE ON THAT THEMATIC
MAP WHERE FAGGOTS ARE LESS THAN SEVENTY FOUR PERCENT OF THE AIDS DEATHS IS
BOSTON WHERE TWO HUNDRED AND EIGHTY FOUR FAGGOT PRIESTS SODOMIZED heterosexual
boys!!
San Francisco
Average 2,004 per 100,000
Black 4,601
White 2,862
Male 3,713
Female 73
Homosexual 57,240
pop 852,469
AIDS deaths = 14,556
Catholic priests = 666
AIDS deaths per priest = 22
Boston/Suffolk Co.
Average 938
Black 1,795
White 712
male 1,499
female 422
Homosexual 74,950
AIDS deaths = 9,988
Catholic priests = 850
AIDS deaths per priest = 12
Seattle/King County
Average 150
Black 1,073
White 398
male 729
female 85
Homosexual 74,950
AIDS deaths = 7,150
Catholic priests = 185 now, 309 in 1990
AIDS deaths per priest = 39 now, 23 in 1990
DC Prince George's County
Average 881
Black 1,170
White 309
HIsp 386
Male 1,190
Female 602
Homosexual 23,800
AIDS Deaths = 7,495
Catholic Priests = 357
AIDS Deaths per priest = 21
Miami-Dade County, Florida
Average 1,221
Black 3433
White 896
Hisp 756
Male 1828
Female 659
Homosexual 27,420
AIDS deaths = 38,400
Catholic priests = 2,121
AIDS deaths per priest = 18.1
Philadelphia
Average 1,284
Black 2,010
White 594
Hisp 1,564
Male 1,929
Female 723
Homosexual 38,580
Orange County
261
Black 787
White 262
Hisp 359
Male 467
Female 62
Homosexual n/a
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_pre_of_hiv_tot_of_pop_age_1549-total-population-ages-15-49
There are 86 African nations, but only about 20 of them are included on the
above graph of HIV rates. Why are the other 66 not on that chart? Because they
have had ZERO HIV rates, and thus ZERO AIDS deaths. Only 17 of these countries
(mostly the African nations who administered ART drugs) have HIV rates higher
than 4%, a rate high enough to sustain an AIDS death "epidemic". The REST of the
world either has had NO AIDS deaths, or such a low rate that it is nowhere close
to being an epidemic.
http://www.statemaster.com/graph/hea_aid_cas_rat_all_age-aids-case-rate-all-ages
At least half of the states fall into that same category: either ZERO AIDS
deaths, or too few to qualify as an epidemic.
So then how do we explain that BOSTON, of all places, would have an AIDS *DEATH*
EPIDEMIC in which some subgroups died of AIDS (not just had HIV) at the rate of
120 per 100,000 population, which almost NO other nation, not even those with
the highest AIDS death rates, ever experienced?
Of course we do have Washington, DC, which no longer qualifies as a civilized
nation, much less state, much less city, who ALSO DID legalize gay marriage, DID
provide "free" condoms, and DID administer ART drugs, PRECISELY what is needed
to give it an even higher AIDS death rate than BOSTON.
At the height of the AIDS epidemic in 1993 in
gay friendly cities like Boston and Washington, DC, where the average AIDS death
rate per 100,000 population of 101.2 exceeded even the Murder Capital of the
World murder rate of "only" 72.4, many states had ZERO AIDS deaths (North
Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, and my city Newport Beach, Ca.).
Furthermore, 17 other states (Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Ohio, Illinois,
Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, West Virginia, Kentucky, Arkansas,
Idaho, Utah, New Mexico, and Alaska) had AIDS death rates less than 1/20th of
Boston and DC, so the number of AIDS deaths was hardly statistically
significant, much less an epidemic.
93% of the 617 AIDS deaths in DC in 1993, or 574 of them, were
homosexuals, who were only 1% of DC's population, for a total of 6,100
homosexuals. Thus in that ONE YEAR, 574 / 6,100 = 9.4% of the homosexuals there
died JUST of AIDS. If it were possible for that rate to continue (which of
course is mathematically impossible), then all homosexuals would have died of
AIDS by the year 2004, which is the ONLY explanation for why there was such a
dramatic drop in the AIDS death rate there.
Thus the dramatic decrease in the AIDS death rate there by 2004 to had NOTHING
at all to do with the administration of EXPENSIVE ART drugs and everything to do
with a dramatic decrease in AIDS carriers.
Gays = 1% of the population but 90% of AIDS deaths = 90:1
Non-gays = 99% of the population but only 10% of AIDS deaths = 0.1:1
Odds Ratio Gays to non-gays = 900 TIMES
�BTW, if 5000 heterosexuals were infected a year and gay are 2000 times more
likely, that would be 5000X2000 right? That would be 1,000,000 a year. Are you
suggesting that there are 1,000,000 gays infected each year?"
These are AIDS DEATHS, not AIDS infections.
You are not computing this correctly. The CDC indicates that the odds ratio of a
homosexual dying of AIDS is 2,200 TIMES greater than that of a heterosexual
dying of AIDS, but the UN data which covers a wider spectrum proves that the
odds ratio is actually 53,800 to one. This is not "1,000,000 gays infected each
year" by any means. The UN data shows that worldwide, for every one heterosexual
who dies of AIDS, 199 homosexuals do. So out of 2.4 million AIDS deaths last
year, 12,000 were heterosexuals and 2,388,000 were homosexuals.
Apr 5, 2013 at 12:37:19 in Politics
| |
Percent of Population |
Percent of AIDS Deaths |
Odds Ratio |
| Heterosexuals |
99.63 |
0.5 |
0.005X |
| Homosexuals |
0.37 |
99.5 |
269X |
| Total |
100 |
100 |
53,800X |
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/basic.htm#ddaids
Even if we accept your reference to the seriously flawed CDC study which is not
at all consistent with the UN data, at face value, you must consider the RATE at
which homosexual males die of AIDS, not just the raw numbers:
Male-to-male sexual contact 555,032
Injection drug use 187,938
Male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use 80,902
Heterosexual contact 77,521
Other 11,975
TOTAL 913,368
Male-to-male sexual contact = 60.7%
Injection drug use = 20.6%
Male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use = 8.9%
Heterosexual contact = 8.5%
Other = 1.3%
Homosexuals = 69.6% of AIDS deaths but only 0.37% of the population
Heterosexuals = 8.5% of the AIDS deaths but 99.43% of the population
Homosexuals are over-represented by 188.1 times
Heterosexuals are under-represented by 0.086 times
Relative to heterosexuals, homosexuals are 2,200 TIMES more likely to die of
AIDS.
|
|
Percent of Population |
Percent of AIDS Deaths |
Odds Ratio |
| Heterosexuals |
99.63 |
8.5 |
0.086X |
| Homosexuals |
0.37 |
60.7 |
188.1X |
| Total |
100 |
100 |
2,187.2X |
"Since the first cases of AIDS were identified in 1981, more
than 30 million people [read: homosexuals] have died from AIDS. An estimated 1.8 million people died
as a result of AIDS in 2010 alone.
"Although there is no cure for AIDS, HIV infection can be
prevented, and those living with HIV can take antiretroviral drugs to prevent or
delay the onset of AIDS. However, in many countries across the world access to
prevention and treatment services is limited. Global leaders have pledged to
work towards
universal access to HIV prevention and care, so that millions of deaths can
be averted."
The cumulative
estimated
number of deaths of persons with an AIDS diagnosis in the United
States and dependent areas, through 2008, was 617,025. In the
50 states and the District of Columbia, this included 589,547
adults and adolescents, and 4,949 children under age 13 years
at death.
While AIDS "experts" in Boston brag that their average AIDS death rate
dropped from 49 deaths per 100,000 population (and 135 per 100,000 Blacks) in
the 1990's to "only" 14.4 in 2002 ("only" 72 TIMES higher than all of East
Asia), and while they take credit that "Major strides have occurred in reducing
AIDS mortality", they conveniently ignore that the *ONLY* reason the AIDS death
rate dropped so dramatically is that so many Catholic priests and other
homosexuals were killed by AIDS and wiped out all the AIDS carriers. Legalizing
gay marriage, promoting "free" condoms, and and prescribing ART drugs in the
midst of an AIDS epidemic is the BEST way to reverse that dramatic trend!
So of course they DID.
In the NMYBRS, 2% of boys identified as gay. 1% identified as gay and HAD had
gay sex and the other 1% identified as gay and NEVER had gay sex. The UN AIDS
project reports that heterosexuals are "only a fraction of 1% of all AIDS
deaths, which means that homosexuals are 99+% of all AIDS deaths. Therefore the
rate of AIDS deaths amongst homosexuals in the early 1990's in Boston was 49 per
1,000 per year. If such a high AIDS death rate could be sustained, than all
homosexuals would die of AIDS within 20.4 years. Blacks with AIDS died at the
rate of 135 per 1,000 Blacks, which means that all homosexual Blacks would die
of AIDS within 7.4 years.
This is the ONLY explanation for Boston's relatively dramatic decrease in the
AIDS death rate. Our medical and science experts could to nothing about AIDS but
to observe and report its progress, which was much easier to do today with
computers and the internet. Had it not been for the surgical precision with
which AIDS killed almost exclusively homosexuals, the AIDS pandemic would have
gotten so far out of control that it would have wiped out the entire human
population within decades.
- The more a country spends to fight AIDS, the higher the AIDS death rate.
- The higher the percentage of people who use condoms, the higher the AIDS
death rate.
- The surest way to spread AIDS is to recommend condoms and encourage
homosexual sex, which is exactly what this UN report recommends.
- 36 million people have HIV.
- 36 million people, including 650 thousand Americans (or 1.8% of the
total), have already died of AIDS.
- 16 million children are orphans because their parents died of AIDS, and
this dramatically increasing trend shows no change in spite of all our AIDS
spending.
- Most of the $26 billion in the world dedicated to fighting AIDS comes
from the US who now has to borrow it from China before we send it to Africa.
- The US provides the vast majority of AIDS funding in countries in
Southern Africa who have the highest AIDS death rates, and no AIDS funding
to countries in Western Europe who have NO AIDS deaths at all.
- Heterosexuals are only a
fraction of one
percent of all AIDS deaths (or download from
here).
There are five different explanations for why increased use of condoms
parallels an increased AIDS death rate
1) Condoms break.
2) Condoms prevent pregnancy but not the transfer of the AIDS virus.
3) Government sanction of condom use leads to more types and larger numbers of
risky [read: anal] "sex".
4) Those who use condoms get used to anal "sex" and have more of it, then fail
to use condoms either because one is not available or they prefer "sex" without
one. It only takes one anal contact to get AIDS.
5) Government sponsorship of condoms increases sexual activity of all types,
particularly risky [read: anal] "sex".
http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/sexualbehaviors/pdf/hiv_factsheet_ymsm.pdf
"Young men who have sex with men:
? Among adolescent males aged 13�19 years, approximately 91% of all diagnosed
HIV infections
are from male-to-male sexual contact.2"
Homosexuals 0.37% of the population, 91% of AIDS cases = odds ratio of 246:1
Heterosexuals 99.63% of the population, 9% of AIDS cases = odds ratio of 0.09:1
Homosexuals, compared to heterosexuals, are 246 / .09 = 2,723 TIMES more likely
to die of AIDS
Good grief! This is no joke.
The DIRECT cause of 100% of these 30 million people around the world and
617,025 Americans who have
died of AIDS, are sodomite
Catholic priests to whom we entrusted our sons for their moral upbringing, only
to have these priests force their sex organ in your sons anal passage.
There is no polite way to say this--this is the most egregious, outrageous,
un-Godly, anti-Christ, blasphemous, and to most of us, incomprehensible,
treachery that priests could inflict on the land:
So ye shall not pollute
the land wherein ye are:
for blood it defileth the land: and the land cannot be cleansed of the blood
that is shed therein, but by the blood of him that shed it.
Numbers 35:33
Do you know what Liberia, Taiwan, CHINA, Japan, Cyprus, Greece, Sweden, Denmark,
Finland, Indonesia, Tajikistan, Algeria, Lithuania, Mongolia, Norway, New
Zealand, Pakistan, Romania, Serbia, and Uzbekistan ALL have in common? They are
the countries which have recorded NO cases of HIV. They are ALSO the countries
with the
FEWEST AIDS carrying, child abusing Catholic priests who openly promote
legalized gay marriage. [Update: we now must add Armenia, Australia, Azerbaijan,
BANGLADESH, Bulgaria, Algeria, Egypt, Fiji, Kazakhstan, and Lebanon to that
list].
Do you know what Estonia, the Dominican Republic, Panama, El Salvador, the US,
Argentina, Colombia, Spain, France, Peru, Costa Rica, Italy, Luxembourg, and
Paraguay ALL have in common? They are the countries with the HIGHEST rates of
HIV. They are ALSO the countries with the HIGHEST percent of AIDS carrying,
child abusing Catholic priests who openly promote legalized gay marriage.
Do you know what the District of Columbia, New York, New Jersey, California,
Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, Delaware, and Rhode Island all have in
common? They were the states in 1993 who had a rate of AIDS
deaths which was up to 100 TIMES higher than many other states. Do you know what
ELSE they ALL had in common? They were the STATES with the HIGHEST percent of
AIDS carrying, child abusing Catholic priests who openly promote legalized gay
marriage.
Do you know what Mississippi, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana,
Alaska, Idaho, Kentucky, West Virginia, Alabama, Arkansas, South Carolina, and
Tennessee ALL have in common? They ALL had very low AIDS death rates, with
Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana reporting NO AIDS cases. And you
guessed it. They were ALSO the states with the LOWEST percentage of AIDS
carrying, child abusing Catholic priests who openly promote legalized gay
marriage.
Which six states STILL have the utterly highest AIDS death rates? The very six
states (New Hampshire, New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, and Vermont,
PLUS Washington, DC.) which just legalized gay marriage, thus giving AIDS deaths
a government stamp of approval, are ALSO the states with AIDS death rates as
much as FORTY TIMES HIGHER than non-Catholic states.
A quarter of a million gays have died of AIDS in Brazil, where the government
is proud of the work they've done to conquer the AIDS epidemic:
1) purchased billions of condoms.
2) bankrupted the medical system with ARV therapy.
3) blamed the US for keeping the price of ARV drugs so high.
4) refocused their medical resources on "solving" this one problem.
And what has been the result? Right in the midst of this deadly and growing AIDS
epidemic which already killed a quarter of a million gays, they legalized gay
marriage.
And what happened? Even though enough gays had already been killed off by AIDS
to significantly reduce the AIDS death rate (which is the ONLY "solution" so
far), the rate of death of gays in some states skyrocketed (in the states with
the most gays, of course).
Because AIDS kills about 10% of the gay population annually, in order to have an
INCREASE in the AIDS death rate, you must have an annual increase in the number
of gays which is at least greater than the 10% who died from AIDS. Yet they
managed to increase the AIDS death rate in the entire southern region of Brazil
by 2 deaths per 100,000 population (which could be as much as 200 deaths per
100,000 gays).
How Did Brazil Measure "Progress"
"There is also more specific communication
activity directed at vulnerable populations such as
transvestites, transsexuals, men that have sex
with men, prostitutes and other target publics that
are still discriminated in the ordinary mass
media. In spite of all the efforts that have been made,
themes related to living with HIV and prevention
are still generally taboo and the mass media is no
exception to the rule. However, after almost 30
years of epidemic and 20 years of mass media
campaigns in AIDS some signs of society's
progress are perceptible and most of them can be
attributed to
communication efforts.
Today, on open TV channels homosexuality is a common
topic in the soap operas, the condom is almost
an obligatory mention any discussions or
programme inserts involving sexual relations;
the figure of the prostitute has become acceptable
to the point of occupying prime time on the
country's biggest TV channel. Such progress is clearly
essential but there was a time when those very
issues were extremely polemical in Brazilian
homes."
The sixty four thousand dollar question: are Brazilians dumber than Bostonians?
Answer: No!
If the intelligence of a people required to obey the Word of God is directly
proportional to their AIDS death rate, then Brazilians are MUCH smarter than
Bostonians, because Boston, the AIDS capital of the industrialized world, had an
AIDS death rate FIVE TIMES HIGHER than Brazil. And just like in Brazil, the only
reason their AIDS rate decreased was not because of any brilliant Harvard lawyer
or doctor, but because all the gays died off. And what did Boston do in the
midst of THEIR out of control AIDS death rate? They too LEGALIZED GAY MARRIAGE.
But Boston gets a double scoop of stupidity. They ALSO did this right in the
midst of the gay priest scandal, where 220 [no, 287] priests in that one city alone had
already ADMITTED that they sodomized boys.
So now we have Bangladesh who reports they have no homosexuals, who we know have
no gay Catholic priests, who spend a paltry $22 per capita for health care, who
nevertheless managed to reduce their AIDS death rate (AND their total number of
AIDS deaths) to ZERO.
I vote for Bangladesh. Boston has no hope. At least Brazil has Carnival.
http://www.census.gov/prod/2/gen/96statab/vitlstat.pdf
1994 DC is Murder Capital of the World With 375 Murders
Yet Almost Twice as Many, 713, Died of AIDS
http://www.census.gov/prod/3/97pubs/97statab/vitstat.pdf
http://www.census.gov/prod/3/98pubs/98statab/sasec2.pdf
See Table 143, which shows DC had an AIDS death rate of 117.8 per 100k, which is
fifteen TIMES higher than Protestant states like Indiana, Minnesota, Maine, and
Infinitely higher than Protestant states like Iowa, Montana, and North Dakota
who had NO AIDS deaths.
World AIDS Death Capital DC
93% of the 617 AIDS deaths in DC in 1993, or 574
of them, were homosexuals, who were only 1% of DC's population, for a total of
6,100 homosexuals. Thus in that ONE YEAR, 574 / 6,100 = 9.4% of the homosexuals
there died JUST of AIDS. If it were possible for that rate to continue (which of
course is mathematically impossible), then all homosexuals would have died of
AIDS by the year 2004, which is the ONLY explanation for why there was such a
dramatic drop in the AIDS death rate there.
World AIDS Death Capital Boston
What Was The Benefit to Boston of Having 220 [correction:
284] Sodomite Priests
Boston Indicators Project
Generally,
HIV/AIDS incidence rates (the rate of newly diagnosed cases) for Boston
residents have been declining. The AIDS incidence rate for 2005 was the lowest
in a decade. HIV incidence rates in 2005 were highest among the 40-49 age group
(127 per 100,000), followed by the 30-39 age group (75 per 100,000). Major
strides have occurred in reducing AIDS mortality since the mid-1990s, with
mortality rates falling from 49 deaths per 100,000 in 1992 to 14.4 deaths per
100,000 in 2002.
"HIV/AIDS: Boston's HIV incidence rate fell to the lowest
point in 2009 at 25.1 per 100,000�less than half the rate in 2000 at 60.7 per
100,000. The rate among men fell from 91.9 per 100,000 in 2000 to 41.9 per
100,000 in 2009 and for women the rate fell from 32 in 2000 to 9.6 per 100,000
in 2009."
Why did the city of Boston have an AIDS death rate four TIMES higher than the
national average, 19 TIMES higher than states like Iowa,
higher than MOST African nations, and infinitely higher than Wyoming, South
Dakota, North Dakota, and Montana who had NO AIDS deaths?
The presence of 220 [no, 287] AIDS carrying Catholic priests who ADMITTED that they
sodomized boys in Boston? And why did the AIDS death rate in Boston drop
two thirds? Most of their priests were killed by AIDS, an event which the
RCC was deathly silent about?
Or because the
number of AIDS carrying sodomizing priests nationwide dropped between 31% and
47%?
Was there a direct correlation between the decrease in this record high AIDS
death rate in Boston, and the number of AIDS carrying priests in Boston?
Number of American Born Diocesan Priests Down 31%
"This anticipated influx of 1,515
priests from abroad will lessen but not solve the continuing clergy shortage
in the United States. Present trends suggest a decline in the number of active
diocesan clergy from 24,603 in 1990 to 18,544 for 2005, a drop of 6,059 priests.
The number of active diocesan clergy will about equal the number of parishes in
the country in 2005. A total of 1,515 additional international immigrants will
offset about 25 percent of the anticipated decline in the number of American
priests. The need for new pastors may well be mitigated but certainly not
relieved by international immigrants."
Number of Total Priests Down 47%
"After skyrocketing from about 27,000 in 1930 to
58,000 in 1965, the number of priests in the United States dropped to
45,000 in 2002. By 2020, there
will be about 31,000 priests--and only 15,000 will be under the age of 70. Right
now there are more priests aged 80 to 84 than there are aged 30 to 34."
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2010/07/27/the-vatican-s-gay-priests.html
The exact number of gay priests worldwide is unknown. A
study conducted in 2000 by Father Donald Cozzens for his book
The Changing Face of Priesthood suggests that as many as 60 percent
of all American Catholic priests were gay, but those numbers varied greatly
depending on geographical location. �At issue at the beginning of the 21st
century is the growing perception that the priesthood is, or is becoming, a
gay profession,� Cozzens wrote in his book. �Heterosexual seminarians are
made uncomfortable by the number of gays around them.�
Celibacy is not optional in the priesthood, so sexual
orientation should be a moot point. But Abbate believes that in Rome, the
heart of Catholicism, gay priests feel a certain liberty that straight
priests do not. He says he found many openly gay priests on Facebook and
other social-networking sites, including a popular Roman Catholic online
community called
Venerabilis. Abbate also discovered through his covert research that
male escorts and transsexual prostitutes in Rome rely on priests as regular
customers. Last March, a member of the Vatican choir admitted to police that
he arranged male escorts for papal assistants, including Angelo Balducci, a
high-ranking member of Gentlemen of his Holiness, a fraternal order whose
members assist the pope. Abbate did not find the same code of conduct for
heterosexual priests. �You just don�t see heterosexual priests out in the
same way,� he says. �Gay priests live freely here; they just do as they
please.�
http://www.statemaster.com/graph/hea_hiv_dea_rat-health-hiv-death-rate
Showing latest available data.
Priests
Dying of AIDS
New York Times, 1 / 31 / 2000 : Kansas City, MO (AP) -- "Roman Catholic priests
in the United States are dying from AIDS-related illnesses at a rate four times
higher than the general population and the cause is often concealed on their
death certificates, The Kansas City Star reported Sunday.
In the first of a three-part series, the newspaper said death certificates and
interviews with experts indicated several hundred priests have died of
AIDS-related illnesses since the mid-1980s and hundreds more are living with
HIV, the virus that causes the disease. 'I think this speaks to a failure on the
part of the church,' said Auxiliary Bishop Thomas Gumbleton of the Archdiocese
of Detroit. 'Gay priests and heterosexual priests didn't know how to handle
their sexuality, their sexual drive. And so they would handle it in ways that
were not healthy.'
The Star received 801 responses to questionnaires that were sent last fall to
3,000 of the 46,000 priests in the United States. Six of 10 priests responding
said they knew of at least one priest who had died of an AIDS-related illness,
and one-third knew a priest living with AIDS. Three-fourths said the church
needed to provide more education to seminarians on sexual issues. 'How to be
celibate and to be gay at the same time, and how to be celibate and heterosexual
at the same time, that's what we were never really taught how to do. And that
was a major failing,' Gumbleton said.
Asked about their sexual orientation, 75 percent said they were heterosexual, 15
percent said they were homosexual, and 5 percent said they were bisexual.
The Rev. John Keenan, who runs Trinity House, an outpatient clinic in Chicago
for priests, said he believes most priests with AIDS contracted the disease
through same-sex relations. He said he treated one priest who had infected eight
other priests.
The Star said precise numbers of priests who have died of AIDS or become
infected with HIV is unknown, partly because many suffer in solitude. When
priests tell their superiors, the cases generally are handled quietly.
The newspaper cited the case of Bishop Emerson Moore, who left the Archdiocese
of New York in 1995 and went to Minnesota, where he died in a hospice of an
AIDS-related illness. His death certificate attributed the death to 'unknown
natural causes' and listed his occupation as 'laborer' in the manufacturing
industry.
After an AIDS activist filed a complaint, officials changed the cause of death
to 'HIV-related illness,' the Star said, but the occupation was not corrected.
The newspaper said the death rate among priests from AIDS appears to be at least
four times that of the rate for the general U.S. population.
Some priests and behavioral experts believe the church has scared priests into
silence by treating homosexual acts as an abomination and the breaking of
celibacy vows as shameful, the Star said.
Catholic cardinals in the United States and high-ranking church officials in the
Vatican declined requests to discuss the newspaper's findings, The Star
reported. The Vatican referred questions to local bishops.
Bishop Raymond Boland of the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph said the AIDS
deaths show that priests are human.
'Much as we would regret it, it shows that human nature is human nature,' he
said. 'And all of us are heirs to all of the misfortunes that can be foisted
upon the human race.''
A follow-up article on the hierarchy's response reported the following:www.beingalivela.org/0131catholicpriestAIDS.html
Church calls US priests'
AIDS deaths no surprise
Kansas City, MO., Jan 31, 2000 (Reuters) --" A report that hundreds of Catholic
priests in America have died of AIDS is 'sad' and a 'disappointment' but not
necessarily a surprise because the disease is so pervasive in society in
general, Catholic Church officials said on Monday.
The statements by Catholic officials came in response to a nationwide
investigation by the Kansas City Star newspaper -- a three-part series running
from Sunday to Tuesday -- that found Catholic priests were dying of AIDS at a
rate far higher than the general U.S. population.
Calling AIDS the 'black plague of our times,' Kansas City, Kansas, Archbishop
James Keleher said in a statement, 'It is no wonder that it (AIDS) has also
touched Catholic clergy as well as ministers of other churches. But no matter
how few clergy it has infected this is surely very sad.'
Rebecca Summers, a spokeswoman for the Catholic Diocese of Kansas City in
Missouri, said though priests take a vow of celibacy, the church is aware that
not all priests are celibate. She said while the Star's findings were a
'disappointment,' they were not necessarily a surprise.
'You have to look at society in general. Why would we say they (priests) would
not mirror what is in the society?' she asked. "
Ms. Summers, let me answer your rhetorical question. I entered the seminary as a
member of a class of 60 aspirants to the priesthood. A few more may have joined
that class over the next 13 years of seminary training (which included high
school, college, novitiate and theology). In the end only 9 of that 60+ were
ordained priests. The Catholic Church teaches that the priesthood is a
"vocation" a special personal selection by God to perform a sacred role. Is it
not therefore absurd to suggest that after years and years of weeding out by the
seminaries, the select few, who are deemed to have been personally chosen by God
to be priests, should "mirror what is in the society"?
And by "society", Ms. Summers, do you mean the whole world, most of which has
yet to be baptized and saved by your Catholic priests? Is that society
what Catholic priests should be expected to mirror?
In my humble opinion, what all the facts reported above show is that, instead of
acting much more divinely than the general population, priests are "four times
as human" as the general population! While some Roman Catholics will resent the
publicizing these facts, those who really care about the church and/or its
priests ought to demand that the church wise up, and instead of barring women
from its pulpits and its rectories, that it welcome that half of the human race
as clergy and the spouses of clergy. And instead of fussing and fuming so much
over behaviors which the bible never even mentioned, including masturbation,
birth control and abortion, the Church would do well to pay more attention to
what the bible did teach, i.e. the need to love God and the neediest of
one's neighbors, and not just in word, but in deed.
In responding to the Albigensian claim that marriage is sordid, St. Bernard of
Clairvaux. said, in the year 1135: 'Take from the Church an honourable marriage
and an immaculate marriage bed, and do you not fill it with concubinage, incest,
homosexuality and every kind of uncleanness?' (Vicars of Christ, p. 409) How
long will it take the Catholic hierarchy to learn what Bernard knew so long ago?
If you haven't already done so, we urge to see
why the Catholic
Church is so obsessed with sex.
Report: Priests hit hard by hidden AIDS epidemic
January 31, 2000
http://www.actupny.org/YELL/catholicpriests.html
KANSAS CITY, Missouri (AP) -- Roman Catholic priests in the United States are
dying from AIDS-related illnesses at a rate four times higher than the general
population and the cause is often concealed on their death certificates, The
Kansas City Star reported in a series of stories that started Sunday.
In the first of a three-part series, the newspaper said death
certificates and interviews with experts indicated several hundred priests have
died of AIDS-related illnesses since the mid-1980s and hundreds more are living
with HIV, the virus that causes the disease.
"I think this speaks to a failure on the part of the church,"
said Auxiliary Bishop Thomas Gumbleton of the Archdiocese of Detroit. "Gay
priests and heterosexual priests didn't know how to handle their sexuality,
their sexual drive. And so they would handle it in ways that were not healthy."
The Star received 801 responses to questionnaires that were
sent last fall to 3,000 of the 46,000 priests in the United States. The margin
of error of the survey was 3.5 percentage points.
Six of 10 priests responding said they knew of at least one
priest who had died of an AIDS-related illness, and one-third knew a priest
living with AIDS. Three-fourths said the church needed to provide more education
to seminarians on sexual issues.
"How to be celibate and to be gay at the same time, and how
to be celibate and heterosexual at the same time, that's what we were never
really taught how to do. And that was a major failing," Gumbleton said.
Asked about their sexual orientation, 75 percent said they
were heterosexual, 15 percent said they were homosexual, and 5 percent said they
were bisexual.
The Rev. John Keenan, who runs Trinity House, an outpatient
clinic in Chicago for priests, said he believes most priests with AIDS
contracted the disease through same-sex relations. He said he treated one priest
who had infected eight other priests.
The Star said precise numbers of priests who have died of
AIDS or become infected with HIV is unknown, partly because many suffer in
solitude. When priests tell their superiors, the cases generally are handled
quietly.
The newspaper cited the case of Bishop Emerson Moore, who
left the Archdiocese of New York in 1995 and went to Minnesota, where he died in
a hospice of an AIDS-related illness. His death certificate attributed the death
to "unknown natural causes" and listed his occupation as "laborer" in the
manufacturing industry.
After an AIDS activist filed a complaint, officials changed
the cause of death to "HIV-related illness," the Star said, but the occupation
was not corrected.
The newspaper said the death rate among priests from AIDS
appears to be at least four times that of the rate for the general U.S.
population.
Some priests and behavioral experts believe the church has scared priests into
silence by treating homosexual acts as an abomination and the breaking of
celibacy vows as shameful, the Star said.
Catholic cardinals in the United States and high-ranking
church officials in the Vatican declined requests to discuss the newspaper's
findings, The Star reported. The Vatican referred questions to local bishops.
Bishop Raymond Boland of the Diocese of Kansas City-St.
Joseph said the AIDS deaths show that priests are human.
"Much as we would regret it, it shows that human nature is
human nature," he said. "And all of us are heirs to all of the misfortunes that
can be foisted upon the human race."
UPDATE November 2000
New Study Finds Catholic Priests Dying From AIDS at Higher
Than Expected Rate
According to a study following a January report on Catholic
priests dying of AIDS, the Kansas City Star has found that the AIDS-related
death rate among priests "exceeds earlier estimates." The Star reported in a
three-part series in January that "hundreds of priests had died of AIDS-related
illnesses and that hundreds more were living with the virus that causes the
disease."
Follow-up research, based on death certificates and
interviews with family members, found an additional 300 AIDS-related priest
deaths nationwide. However, researchers were unable to count AIDS-related deaths
in the nearly two-thirds of states that do not disclose death records, and
experts say that the "exact AIDS death toll among U.S. priests will never be
known." In the 14 states that allowed the Star to access death records, the
paper found that the AIDS-related death rate among priests was "more than
double" the rate among all adult males in those states and more than six times
the rate among the general population in those states. The Star reports that
these rates "exceeded the estimates and projections reported earlier this year
by the newspaper," and the follow-up investigation reveals that "there is no
longer any question that hundreds of priests have died of AIDS and that many
bishops were aware of their plights."
Mixed Response
The new study has sparked further controversy surrounding the
relationship between priests, who are required to be celibate, and AIDS (Thomas,
Kansas City Star, 11/4).
An op-ed to the Star by Rev. Patrick Rush, the vicar general
of the Catholic Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph, states that the paper's
conclusions "are not consistent with the experience of our local diocese: not
the death rate, not the silence and not the denial." He added, "The Star's
continued reporting on the subject of priests with AIDS sadly misses the point.
Any death from HIV/AIDS is a tragedy. ... It is a problem for us all" (Rush,
Kansas City Star, 11/6).
But advocates cite the report as evidence that the Catholic
Church needs to further address the issue.
Eugene Kennedy, former priest and biographer of the late
Cardinal Joseph Bernardin of Chicago, said, "The fact that you have priests
having very active sexual lives, that you have priests contracting HIV and dying
of AIDS and that they have refused to come to terms with this and tend to deny
it, I don't see how you look at this and not say that these are symptoms of an
unresolved sexual problem within the church."
Sister Mary Ann Walsh, spokesperson for the Conference of
Bishops, said the church "had been active in dealing with the AIDS issue and
that seminary formation programs today are doing a better job of educating
priests about sexuality issues."
Examples of recent efforts to address sexual issues and AIDS
within the church include:
The National Federation of Priests' Councils is "updating" a
93-page document about AIDS. It now provides direction on how dioceses and
religious orders should "deal with" HIV-positive priests and whether priest
candidates should be tested for HIV.
The National Conference of Catholic Bishops, originally one
of the study's "harshest critics," is endorsing a "major study" to look at
problems priests face in their first five years after ordination. Dean Hoge, the
study's principal investigator, said that the topics of sexuality and celibacy
will be addressed.
The Church of England revealed this year that at least 25% of
its priests had died of AIDS-related illnesses, and in September mandated that
all Anglican bishops in southern Africa undergo HIV testing.
Root of the Problem
Through interviews with priests, AIDS experts, doctors,
psychologists and educators, the Star found a general consensus that more
education and communication is needed to curb the "tragedy of priests dying of
AIDS."
Rev. Thomas Reese, editor of America magazine, a national
Jesuit publication, cited the biggest issue as the "silence surrounding ... gay
priests." Reese said, "The silence highlights a tension in a church that defines
homosexuality as 'intrinsically disordered' but relies on many gay men to
celebrate the sacraments and carry out the work of the church."
Jon Fuller, a Jesuit priest and Boston physician who
specializes in AIDS, lamented the fact that the Vatican discourages open
discussions on sexuality, considers homosexual relations a sin and opposes
"modern practice" of safe sex.
However, the church has not entirely ignored the AIDS
epidemic and has served as a "major provider of AIDS services" in San Francisco,
according to the Rev. Jim Mitulski, co-pastor of Metropolitan Community Church
of San Francisco, a "predominantly gay congregation." Mitulski said, "It's
compassion that comes with a price tag. ... The irony is, here's this
institution that does have a heart for sick people, but at the same time, it's
fostering a climate where HIV continues to be spread" (Kansas City Star, 11/4).
Global HIV and AIDS estimates, end of 2009
The latest statistics of the global
HIV and
AIDS epidemic were
published by UNAIDS in November 2010, and refer to the end of 2009.
|
Estimate
|
Range
|
| People living with HIV/AIDS in 2009
|
33.3 million
|
31.4-35.3 million
|
| Adults living with HIV/AIDS in 2009
|
30.8 million
|
29.2-32.6 million
|
| Women living with HIV/AIDS in 2009
|
15.9 million
|
14.8-17.2 million
|
| Children living with HIV/AIDS in 2009
|
2.5 million
|
1.6-3.4 million
|
| People newly infected with HIV in 2009
|
2.6 million
|
2.3-2.8 million
|
| Adults newly infected with HIV in 2009
|
2.2 million
|
2.0-2.4 million
|
| AIDS deaths in 2009
|
1.8 million
|
1.6-2.1 million
|
| Orphans (0-17) due to AIDS in 2009
|
16.6 million
|
14.4-18.8 million
|
At the end of 2009,
women
accounted for just over half of all adults living with HIV worldwide.
33.3 million living with HIV / 1.8 million AIDS deaths = 18.5 HIV cases per
AIDS death
Is
AIDS a 100% black disease?
No.
"The
study's
credibility became an issue last October after part of its findings on
population was released and then withdrawn because some field data were not
factored into the 5.2-million population estimate. At the same time, another
study by a San Francisco-based group � using a broader definition of who was
Jewish � placed the population at 6.7 million. But after reevaluating its
methodology and findings, UJC said Wednesday that it stood by the 5.2-million
figure."
Worldwide population
of jews dropped by six [sic] million between 1988 and
2002
The simple observation that Washington, DC, the health care capitol of the world, the
national center for health care professionals and health statistics, the city which spends
more money per capita for health care than most blacks of the world EARN, the one with
more politicians and lobbyists per square inch than any other land, is also the AIDS
capitol, should make us question some basic political "facts". From this
we might postulate the following theorems:
It's mostly if not exclusively blacks who carry AIDS.
The more money government spends to solve the problem, the worse the problem gets.
"Health" "care" officials don't "care" and they don't
promote "health".
All of the above.
We can test these theorems by cross-checking data from the 1996 US Statistical Abstract
for other states, like ND, SD, Montana, and Wyoming, etc., whose "AIDS" column
is marked "N.A.", which can mean either "not applicable" or "not
available". Of course AIDS is applicable to these and other states, so then why
would such data not be "available"?
The reality is that these states had NO AIDS cases, not that the data was not
"applicable" or "available". In a state with as small a
population as North Dakota, just ONE Aids case would give that state an AIDS rate of .17
per 100,000 population, an easy figure to understand and report.
By the time The 2006 US Statistical Abstract was published, this category had been
changed from "N/A", to "S", which now means "Figure does not meet
standards of reliability or precision", and the number of states in this
category increased from only four, to 10, adding Alaska, Idaho, Maine, New Hampshire,
Utah, and Vermont. Since 8 other states [Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Nebraska,
New Mexico, West Virginia, and Wisconsin], whose AIDS death rates were high enough to be
listed, had rates lower than 2.0, it's a good bet that "S" actually means
"No AIDS cases". In addition, even though these are mostly White states,
there are enough or more than enough other races [specifically blacks and Hispanics] to
account for most if not all AIDS deaths in those states.
The number of Asians and Whites in DC is too small for them to be a significant part of
the AIDS epidemic in Washington, which leaves the 82% who were black and the 10% who were
Hispanic as the major contributors, providing a quick and easy way to estimate their AIDS
death rates:
DC 101.2 x 585 = 592 AIDS deaths per year
x / 480,000 = 126 per 100k, x = 605 AIDS deaths per year in DC
Blacks = 384k
Hispanics = 35k
X = AIDS rate Hispanics
2X = AIDS rate of blacks
0.35X + (3.84 x 2X) = 592
8.03X = 592
X = 74
2X = 148
600,000 x 82% = 492,000 blacks
600,000 x 10% = 60,000 Hispanics, x 60 per 100k = 36 AIDS deaths per year
for Hispanics
(605 - 36) / 492,000 = 115.7 AIDS deaths per year for blacks
6,000 blacks in North Dakota x 115.7 AIDS deaths per 100k = 7 AIDS deaths
Is it possible that blacks in North Dakota have not yet gotten AIDS because they've not
been in sexual contact with AIDS-carrying blacks of the major cities? Or is their
sexual behavior influenced by the large percentage of Whites around them, reducing
extra-marital sex as well as AIDS? Or is it possible that there's another factor at
work here, in addition to this clear and obvious link between blacks and AIDS? Or
were there actually 7 AIDS deaths amongst blacks in North Dakota which weren't reported to
health officials, or which weren't known to be AIDS?
An AIDS rate of 25.5 in 1993 in Florida with a population of 13.5 million is 3,443 AIDS
deaths per year, yet if the 1.9 million blacks there died at the rate of 126, there would
have been 2,394 AIDS deaths, plus another 1,020 out of the 1.7 million Hispanics with an
AIDS rate of 60, for a total of 3,414 AIDS deaths. Since this is within 1% of the
actual rate, our estimate for DC is plausible.
In Colorado, with an AIDS rate of 10.8 and a population of 3.5 million, there were 378
AIDS deaths that year. With 147k blacks at 126, 19 of these deaths would have been
blacks, and with 680k Hispanics at 60, another 368 AIDS deaths ought to have Hispanics if
our theorem is correct, for a total of 387 predicted AIDS deaths, 2% higher than actual
AIDS deaths. Our theorem is tracking nicely.
STATES WITH AIDS DEATH RATES HIGHER THAN PREDICTED
Just like Washington, New York always sticks out like a sore thumb on statistics like
this, spending almost as much for education while still producing some of the lowest
scoring students in the WORLD, not just the nation. So just as expected New York
also spends gobs of money for health care and ends up with an AIDS death rate of 37.4, FAR
larger than would be predicted by their known and reported percentage of blacks and
Hispanics. At an AIDS death rate of 126 per 100k blacks, there should have been
only 3,906 AIDS deaths out 3.1 million blacks in New York, a state wide rate of only
21.6. The 1.8 million Hispanics at a rate of 60 would have had 1,080 AIDS deaths
which increases this statewide rate to 27.5, so the actual AIDS death rate in New York is
36% higher than predicted, seriously challenging our theorem.
New Jersey with 28 AIDS deaths per 100k population and a population of 7.8 million had
2,184 AIDS deaths annually that year. With 1.1 million blacks whose average AIDS
death rate is 126, 1,386 of these deaths should be blacks, plus 807k Hispanics with an
AIDS death rate of 60 or 48 more AIDS deaths, for a total of 1,434 predicted AIDS
deaths. So actual AIDS deaths in New Jersey are 58% higher than predicted, an even
more serious challenge to our theorem.
Massashusetts: 12.9, pop of 6 million, 774 AIDS deaths, 347k blacks at 126 is 437
deaths, 314k Hispanics at 60 is 19, for a total of 456 predicted AIDS deaths. Actual
AIDS deaths In Massachusetts were 70% higher than predicted, raising serious questions
about our theorem.
Minnesota: 4.5, pop of 4.5 million, 203 AIDS deaths, 100k blacks at 126 is 126 AIDS
deaths, plus 62k Hispanics a 60 = 37, for a total of 163 predicted AIDS deaths, so actual
deaths were 25% higher than predicted.
What other racial group might be more likely to get AIDS than Whites, as well
as be present in significant enough numbers in Massachusetts, New York and New Jersey, to
increase their AIDS rate by that much?
It's well documented by jews themselves that jews have 112
hereditary diseases which no other race has, while blacks have only two, and Whites
have none. Could our theorem that blacks are the AIDS carriers be wrong, and might
it actually be jews instead? Could the percentage of jews in Washington, DC, be so
high that it's THEY who are the original AIDS carriers who gave AIDS to blacks
there? If jews have 56 TIMES as many hereditary diseases as blacks, then should not
this make us suspicious of the role played by jews who demanded in 1957 that jews not be
separated as a separate race and thus may be concealing their own rate of extinction?
An AIDS rate of 20.2 in 1993 in California with a population of 30.9 million is 6,242
AIDS deaths per year, yet if the 2.4 million blacks died at a rate of 126, there would
have been 3,024 AIDS deaths, plus 7.8 million Hispanics at 60 is another 4,680, for a
total of 7,704 AIDS deaths, 23% higher than actual. Is it possible that the actual
AIDS death rate of Hispanics, many of whom just immigrated [or broke in illegally] from
Mexico, is [(6,242 - 3,893) / 7.8 million] = 30 per 100k, half that of Hispanics in DC and
Florida? When broken down by White Hispanic vs. non-White Hispanic, does California
confirm our theorem?
24,924,000 Whites
17,112,000 non-Hispanic Whites
7,812,000 Hispanic Whites
8,353,000 Hispanics
[(6,242 - 3,893) / X ] =60, X = 39.2 [x 100,000] = 3,920,000 who get AIDS
4,430,000 Hispanics who don't get AIDS
The answer is NO! A different AIDS rate for Hispanic Whites doesn't provide
the answer.
STATES WITH PREDICTED AIDS DEATH RATES HIGHER THAN ACTUAL
In 1993, Iowa, with an AIDS death rate of 2.6 and a population of 2.8 million had 73
AIDS deaths. If the 52k blacks there died at the same rate as blacks in Florida and
DC, there were 66 deaths of blacks, and for the 37k Hispanics at 60 is another 22, for a
total of 88, 20% higher than actual.
The AIDS rate in Iowa decreased to 1.0 by 2004 and the population increased to 3
million for a total 30 AIDS deaths per year. If the 68,000 blacks there died at a
rate of 42, one third of the high of 126 that they did in DC, there would have been 22
AIDS deaths per year, plus 104k Hispanics at a rate of 20, or 21 deaths, for a total of
43, 43% higher than actual.
An AIDS rate of 14.2 in 1993 in Texas with a population of 17.7 million is 2,513 AIDS
deaths, yet if the 2.1 million blacks there died at the rate of 126, there would have been
2,646 dead blacks, plus 4.6 million Hispanics at 60 is another 2,760 deaths, for a total
of 5,406. The predicted rate is 2.2 times higher than the actual rate. No
jews?
Louisiana, 14.7, pop of 4.3 million, is 632 AIDS deaths, 1.34 million blacks at 126 is
1,688 AIDS deaths, 84k Hispanics at 60 is 50 AIDS deaths, for a total of 1,738, almost
three times as many predicted as actual deaths.
Missouri, 8.1, pop of 5.2 million , 421 AIDS deaths, 565k blacks at 126 is 71 deaths,
66k Hispanics at 60 is 40 AIDS deaths,for a total of 111, almost four times as many
predicted as actual deaths.
Is it the presence of Hispanics and not blacks in states like Arizona, New
Mexico, and Colorado which caused them to have an AIDS death rate an order of magnitude
higher than states with no or few blacks and Hispanics like ND, SD, Wyoming, Montana,
Idaho, Utah, Iowa, Nebraska:
Arizona, 10.5, pop of 3.8 million, 399 AIDS deaths, 125k blacks at 126 is 16
deaths, 751k Hispanics at 60 is 451 AIDS deaths, for a total of 467 AIDS deaths, or 17%
higher than actual AIDS deaths. Is it possible that the AIDS death rate for
Hispanics in Arizona is [(399 - 16) / 751k] = 51 per 100k, about 15% lower than estimated
for Hispanics in DC?
New Mexico, 7.2, pop of 1.6 million, 115 AIDS deaths, 36k blacks at 126 is 45
deaths, 614k Hispanics at 60 is 368, for a total of 413, or 3.6 TIMES higher than actual
deaths. Is it possible that [(115 - 45) / 614k] = 11.4 per 100k, about a sixth of
that for Hispanics in DC?
Nevada, 11.7, pop of 1.3 million ,152 AIDS deaths, 92k blacks at 126 is 116 deaths,
149k Hispanics at 60 is 89 deaths, or 205 AIDS deaths, so predicted deaths were 35% higher
than actual deaths.
Georgia, 18.1, pop of 6.8 million, 1,231 AIDS deaths, 1.9 million blacks at 126 is
2,394 deaths, 124k Hispanics at 60 is 7 deaths ,for a total of 2,401 deaths, 95% higher
than actual deaths. If 100% of the AIDS deaths in Ga. were blacks, then they had an
AIDS death rate of only 65, about half the TOTAL rate of DC.
Nebraska 2.7, pop of 1.6 million, 43 AIDS deaths, 60 k blacks at 126 is 76 AIDS deaths,
plus 42k Hispanics at 60 is 25.2, for a total of 101 predicted deaths, 2.3 x higher than
actual.
THE ANSWER IS NO.
The high AIDS rate in those states cannot be explained by blacks and Hispanics,
because even the most pessimistic estimate for their rate of AIDS deaths cannot be
explained just by those populations alone.
Which leaves us with only one possibility--JEWS!
Even if we estimate that the AIDS rate for Hispanics is zero, states like Mississippi,
Louisiana, Georgia, and Arkansas STILL have AIDS rates much lower than predicted,
suggesting that the presence of Hispanics doesn't influence the AIDS rate. But
states like Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Arizona, New Mexico, and Nevada have AIDS
rates much HIGHER than predicted. And what do they have in common? jews.
The simple fact that the AIDS rate of 37.2 in New York with relatively few blacks and
Hispanics is three times higher than states like South Carolina (at 12.7) with FAR more
blacks, and four times higher than states like New Mexico (at 7.2) where more than a third
of the population are Hispanics, seriously challenges if not negates our theorem.
Why do states like California, New York, New Jersey, and Florida have sky high rates (up
to TEN TIMES HIGHER), than states like Idaho, Utah, Alaska, and New Hampshire? JEWS.
While there may be some correlation between the sex behavior of blacks and Whites which
might cause blacks to get AIDS more often, this alone comes nowhere close to explaining
the ten to forty fold difference in AIDS deaths from state to state. In most sexual
activities, blacks are only 25-50% more likely than Whites to engage in risky sexual
behavior, including homosexuality. The suggestion that blacks get AIDS more often
because they use more of the illegal drugs which have been attributed to the AIDS pandemic
than Whites is disputed by the fact that per capita, Whites use more of these drugs than
blacks. Even so, such a minor difference if it did exist would hardly explain a
forty fold variation in AIDS rates from state to state, or country to country [read:
Germany].
Since jews demanded in 1958, and got, Congress and the Census Bureau to quit
categorizing jews as a separate race, ethnic group, tribe, and religion, there's no
official statistic for the percent of jews in these states. But the very low test scores in all standardized tests for these states
enable us to calculate the percentage of jews VERY accurately--much more accurately than jews themselves can calculate them. Voila, once
these percentages are plugged in for each state, we discover the following:
There are 17.6 million jews in the US, not only 6 million as jews claim.
jews die of AIDS at a rate 5 TIMES higher than blacks, or 156 per 100,000 population.
R-squared for the correlation between the percentage of jews by state and the AIDS death
rate is almost 0.9.
Almost three quarters of the 36,990 AIDS deaths in the US is 1993 were jews.
The real carriers of AIDS are jews, not blacks, not pigmies, and not monkeys.
WHERE ARE 7-10 MILLION MISSING JEWS?
The worldwide population of jews in 1988 was 18.1 million.
At the normal growth rate of 1.5% per year, there would have been 21.8 million by
2006, and at only 1% per year there would have been 23.8 million. Yet jew sources report that there were only 13.3 million. So
where were the other 8.5 to 10.5 million jews? Did they all die from AIDS?
The above analysis suggests that this is precisely what happened to them. What
other explanation can there be? And why did the news media, which spends prodigious
amounts of energy chasing down a supposed 6 million holocausted jews from more than half a
century ago COMPLETELY ignore this most damaging holocaust [with holocaust being a
reference only to the deaths of jews and nobody else, like the 264 million Christians who
died in WWII], which eliminated up to 60% [SIXTY PERCENT] of the world's supply of jews?
By 2002, the AIDS rate in states with the most jews decreased dramatically,
whereas in the states with few jews there was a very small decrease, further evidence that
AIDS decimated the jewish population, in the world, not just in the US. It's not
that jews were dying at a slower rate--it was that there were fewer of them left alive.
The same is true of the black populations, particularly Washington, DC, where the
percent who are blacks plunged from 82% to less than 60% (along with the murder rate).
But even with that reduction, Washington retained its title as both the AIDS
Capitol of the US, as well as the Murder Capitol of the WORLD.
Even with an average AIDS rate for blacks of 27, states with many blacks and few jews
like Mississippi, Florida, and Indiana, had average AIDS rates even lower than that.
If blacks are the only ones with AIDS in those states, then their AIDS death rate
in Mississippi is 21, in Florida is 25.5, and in Indiana is 18. This MIGHT be
explained by their not being in contact with blacks in areas with higher risk to AIDS
through sodomy and illicit drugs--or it may be that blacks have an even lower AIDS rate
than predicted above, or about 20. Once adjusted for these anomalies, the AIDS rate
for jews in 1993 must be increased to 220, meaning that jews are 11 TIMES more likely to
die of AIDS than blacks, something you would never learn from the jew controlled
"news" media. Why are jews being so silent about their own demise, when
they still scream from the rooftops about being "holocausted" more than half a
century ago?
Of the 36,9990 AIDS deaths in 1993, 30,699 or 83% of them were jews and only 17% were
blacks. In 2002, of the 14,210 AIDS deaths, 62% or 8,833 of them were jews and 38% were
blacks. The number of Hispanics, Whites, Asians, and Indians who died of AIDS were
statistically insignificant.
The only explanation for this two thirds reduction in the AIDS rate in the US is that
the primary target of AIDS, jews, were almost wiped out, having been reduced from 14
million to only 4 million.
Even if jews are 20% or 40% more likely to engage in risky sexual behavior, this
doesn't even begin to explain the GREATER THAN FORTY FOLD difference in the AIDS death
rate from state to state. Or perhaps risky behavior starts the process, then it
mushrooms from there, but what most would rather believe is that God decided to show our
primarily jewish "doctors" a thing or two, and created a disease that:
- Kills MOSTLY jews.
- Kills mostly jew "DOCTORS", who needless to say are killing US by the hundreds
of thousands, ANNUALLY.
- Is INCURABLE.
- CANNOT BE PREVENTED, and increases as the use of condoms increases.
- HAS NO DEFENSE for the races it's attacking [and jews are ELEVEN times more likely to be
killed by AIDS than blacks].
- Is an utterly MISERABLE death [though maybe not miserable enough for the jews we've been
hearing from lately].
- Teaches us the perfect lesson about the evils of race mixing.
- Will vastly accelerate the expulsion of all AIDS-ridden muds.
Before completing this analysis, it was expected that blacks and Hispanics would be the
main victims of AIDS. It was a surprise to discover that Hispanics have almost no
AIDS [other than what they, and what WHITES, get from jews and blacks].
Population of District of Columbia is 25% jews
The only way to explain the extraordinary AIDS fatality
rate in our nation's capitol is not Blacks, but jews. The official figure
of 4.4% jews is obviously too low anyway, considering how many jews there now
are in top government positions. If jews are actually 25% of the
population, a much more believable figure, then their AIDS death rate fits the
curve perfectly. And it proves that jews, not Blacks, are the primary
carrier of AIDS, which is evidently one more of the 112 genetic
hereditary diseases that only jews get.
|
|
percent |
per 100k |
|
|
jews |
AIDS |
| Mass |
6.30% |
26.5 |
| NY |
9% |
37.40 |
| NJ |
5.50% |
28 |
| N D |
0.10% |
0 |
| SD |
0.10% |
0 |
| AK |
0.50% |
4.3 |
| FL |
4.70% |
25.5 |
| Co |
1.40% |
10.8 |
| Ca |
3% |
20.2 |
|
|
25% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DC |
4.40% |
101.2 |
|
|
|
|
| Ga |
1.10% |
18.1 |
Showing latest available data.
November 11, 2002
Boston University will monitor an HIV/AIDS treatment program for the Springfield,
Mass., Hispanic community to determine if culturally sensitive services targeted to
Hispanic heroin users increase their entry into drug treatment, testing and prevention
programs. It is hoped that the five-year study, funded by a $2.5 million Department of
Health and Human Services grant to Tapestry Health Systems, will reduce the rate of
HIV/AIDS in Springfield. Springfield, the 71st most populous city in the nation, is ranked
24th for its HIV/AIDS rate. Hispanics, who make up a quarter of Springfield’s
population, make up more than half of the city’s residents with HIV/AIDS.The
Body Boston University to Evaluate Springfield AIDS Treatment Program
AIDS Death Rates by State and Race
jews are 5 times more
likely than blacks to die of AIDS
|
State |
Popu
lation
Mil lions |
Actual
1993 HIV Death
Rate per 100k |
Per
cent
Blacks |
Mil
lion
Blacks |
Per
cent
His
panic |
Mil
lion
His
panic |
Per cent
jews |
Mil
lion
jews |
Predict ed
AIDS
Rate |
Actual
AIDS
Deaths |
AIDS
Deaths
Blacks |
AIDS
Deaths
His panics
|
AIDS deaths
jews |
Amount
by
Which Higher
Than
Predict ed |
|
U.S. |
255.1 |
14.5 |
|
31.65 |
|
24.3 |
6.90% |
17.6 |
|
36,990 |
9,495 |
0 |
27,459 |
36 |
|
DC
. |
0.585 |
101.2 |
65.6% |
0.384 |
6.0% |
0.035 |
20.00% |
0.12 |
50.9 |
592 |
115 |
0 |
183 |
294 |
|
NY . |
18.1 |
37.4 |
17.1% |
3.1 |
13.0% |
2.36 |
20.68% |
3.74 |
37.4 |
6,769 |
930 |
0 |
5,839 |
0 |
|
NJ . |
7.8 |
28 |
14.1% |
1.1 |
10.4% |
0.81 |
15.24% |
1.19 |
28.0 |
2,184 |
330 |
0 |
1,854 |
0 |
|
FL . |
13.5 |
25.5 |
14.1% |
1.9 |
12.8% |
1.73 |
13.64% |
1.84 |
25.5 |
3,443 |
570 |
0 |
2,872 |
0 |
|
CA . |
30.9 |
20.2 |
7.7% |
2.38 |
27.0% |
8.35 |
11.47% |
3.54 |
20.2 |
6,242 |
714 |
0 |
5,528 |
0 |
|
CT . |
3.279 |
16.3 |
8.8% |
0.288 |
7.0% |
0.228 |
8.76% |
0.29 |
16.3 |
534 |
86 |
0 |
448 |
0 |
|
MD. |
4.9 |
20.2 |
25.7% |
1.26 |
2.9% |
0.143 |
8.00% |
0.39 |
20.2 |
990 |
378 |
0 |
612 |
0 |
|
MA . |
5.993 |
12.9 |
5.8% |
0.347 |
5.2% |
0.314 |
7.16% |
0.43 |
12.9 |
773 |
104 |
0 |
669 |
0 |
|
DE . |
0.691 |
15.3 |
17.5% |
0.121 |
2.6% |
0.018 |
6.47% |
0.04 |
15.3 |
106 |
36 |
0 |
70 |
0 |
|
GA . |
6.8 |
18.1 |
27.9% |
1.9 |
1.8% |
0.124 |
6.23% |
0.42 |
18.1 |
1,231 |
570 |
0 |
661 |
0 |
|
TX . |
17.8 |
14.2 |
11.8% |
2.1 |
26.4% |
4.7 |
6.83% |
1.22 |
14.2 |
2,528 |
630 |
0 |
1,897 |
1 |
|
HI. . |
1.2 |
10 |
2.4% |
0.029 |
7.5% |
0.09 |
6.00% |
0.07 |
10.1 |
120 |
9 |
0 |
112 |
-1 |
|
WA. |
5.1 |
10.1 |
3.2% |
0.165 |
4.7% |
0.242 |
5.85% |
0.30 |
10.1 |
515 |
50 |
0 |
465 |
0 |
|
CO . |
3.5 |
10.8 |
4.2% |
0.147 |
13.1% |
0.457 |
6.10% |
0.21 |
10.8 |
378 |
44 |
0 |
333 |
1 |
|
AZ . |
3.8 |
10.5 |
3.3% |
0.125 |
19.8% |
0.751 |
6.10% |
0.23 |
10.5 |
399 |
38 |
0 |
362 |
0 |
|
RI. . |
1 |
10.4 |
4.5% |
0.045 |
5.0% |
0.05 |
5.80% |
0.06 |
10.4 |
104 |
14 |
0 |
90 |
0 |
|
OR . |
3 |
8.9 |
1.7% |
0.051 |
4.2% |
0.127 |
5.40% |
0.16 |
8.9 |
267 |
15 |
0 |
253 |
-1 |
|
NV . |
1.34 |
11.7 |
6.9% |
0.092 |
11.1% |
0.149 |
6.20% |
0.08 |
11.7 |
157 |
28 |
0 |
130 |
0 |
|
IL . . |
11.6 |
11.2 |
15.5% |
1.8 |
8.4% |
0.975 |
4.20% |
0.49 |
11.2 |
1,299 |
540 |
0 |
760 |
-1 |
|
PA . |
12 |
9.1 |
9.2% |
1.1 |
2.1% |
0.25 |
4.05% |
0.49 |
9.1 |
1,092 |
330 |
0 |
758 |
4 |
|
VT . |
0.571 |
4.5 |
0.4% |
0.002 |
0.7% |
0.004 |
2.80% |
0.02 |
4.5 |
26 |
1 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
|
LA . |
4.3 |
14.7 |
31.2% |
1.34 |
2.3% |
0.098 |
3.40% |
0.15 |
14.7 |
632 |
402 |
0 |
228 |
2 |
|
NC . |
6.8 |
11.6 |
22.1% |
1.5 |
1.2% |
0.084 |
3.20% |
0.22 |
11.6 |
789 |
450 |
0 |
339 |
-1 |
|
VA . |
6.4 |
10.5 |
19.2% |
1.23 |
2.8% |
0.178 |
3.00% |
0.19 |
10.4 |
672 |
369 |
0 |
300 |
3 |
|
MO. |
5.2 |
8.1 |
10.9% |
0.565 |
1.3% |
0.066 |
3.06% |
0.16 |
8.0 |
421 |
170 |
0 |
248 |
3 |
|
NM. |
1.6 |
7.2 |
2.3% |
0.036 |
38.4% |
0.614 |
4.20% |
0.07 |
7.2 |
115 |
11 |
0 |
105 |
0 |
|
SC . |
3.6 |
12.7 |
27.8% |
1 |
0.7% |
0.025 |
2.80% |
0.10 |
12.7 |
457 |
300 |
0 |
157 |
0 |
|
OK . |
3.2 |
6.5 |
7.7% |
0.246 |
2.9% |
0.094 |
2.70% |
0.09 |
6.5 |
208 |
74 |
0 |
135 |
-1 |
|
MN. |
4.5 |
4.5 |
2.2% |
0.1 |
1.4% |
0.062 |
2.45% |
0.11 |
4.5 |
203 |
30 |
0 |
172 |
1 |
|
WI . |
5 |
5.1 |
5.3% |
0.263 |
2.0% |
0.102 |
2.19% |
0.11 |
5.0 |
255 |
79 |
0 |
171 |
5 |
|
UT . |
1.8 |
4 |
0.7% |
0.013 |
5.2% |
0.094 |
2.42% |
0.04 |
4.0 |
72 |
4 |
0 |
68 |
0 |
|
MI. . |
9.4 |
7.4 |
13.8% |
1.3 |
2.3% |
0.215 |
2.09% |
0.20 |
7.4 |
696 |
390 |
0 |
306 |
0 |
|
NH . |
1.115 |
3.3 |
0.6% |
0.007 |
1.1% |
0.012 |
2.00% |
0.02 |
3.3 |
37 |
2 |
0 |
35 |
0 |
|
OH . |
11 |
6.3 |
10.9% |
1.2 |
1.4% |
0.149 |
1.94% |
0.21 |
6.3 |
693 |
360 |
0 |
333 |
0 |
|
TN . |
5 |
7.8 |
16.2% |
0.81 |
0.8% |
0.038 |
1.88% |
0.09 |
7.8 |
390 |
243 |
0 |
147 |
0 |
|
IN. . |
5.7 |
5.2 |
7.9% |
0.45 |
1.8% |
0.1 |
1.82% |
0.10 |
5.2 |
296 |
135 |
0 |
162 |
0 |
|
AK . |
0.588 |
4.3 |
4.1% |
0.024 |
3.4% |
0.02 |
1.80% |
0.01 |
4.0 |
25 |
7 |
0 |
17 |
2 |
|
ID. . |
1 |
3.3 |
0.4% |
0.004 |
5.9% |
0.059 |
2.05% |
0.02 |
3.3 |
33 |
1 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
|
KS . |
2.5 |
4.6 |
6.0% |
0.15 |
4.0% |
0.1 |
1.80% |
0.05 |
4.6 |
115 |
45 |
0 |
70 |
0 |
|
WV. |
1.8 |
3.4 |
3.2% |
0.057 |
0.5% |
0.009 |
1.58% |
0.03 |
3.4 |
61 |
17 |
0 |
44 |
0 |
|
IA. . |
2.8 |
2.6 |
1.9% |
0.052 |
1.3% |
0.037 |
1.30% |
0.04 |
2.6 |
73 |
16 |
0 |
57 |
0 |
|
KY . |
3.8 |
3.7 |
7.1% |
0.269 |
0.6% |
0.023 |
1.01% |
0.04 |
3.7 |
141 |
81 |
0 |
60 |
0 |
|
NE . |
1.6 |
2.7 |
3.8% |
0.06 |
2.6% |
0.042 |
1.00% |
0.02 |
2.7 |
43 |
18 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
|
AR . |
2.4 |
5.1 |
15.9% |
0.381 |
0.9% |
0.022 |
0.32% |
0.01 |
5.3 |
122 |
114 |
0 |
12 |
-4 |
|
AL . |
4.1 |
7.5 |
26.8% |
1.1 |
0.7% |
0.027 |
0.00% |
0.00 |
8.0 |
308 |
330 |
0 |
0 |
-23 |
|
MS . |
2.6 |
7.3 |
34.6% |
0.9 |
0.7% |
0.017 |
0.00% |
0.00 |
10.4 |
190 |
270 |
0 |
0 |
-80 |
|
WY. |
0.465 |
0 |
0.9% |
0.004 |
5.8% |
0.027 |
0.00% |
0.00 |
0.3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
-1 |
|
ND . |
0.634 |
0 |
0.6% |
0.004 |
0.8% |
0.005 |
0.00% |
0.00 |
0.2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
-1 |
|
SD . |
0.708 |
0 |
0.6% |
0.004 |
0.8% |
0.006 |
0.00% |
0.00 |
0.2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
-1 |
|
MT . |
0.8 |
0 |
0.4% |
0.003 |
1.6% |
0.013 |
0.00% |
0.00 |
0.1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
-1 |
Did the Salk
Vaccine Cause AIDS, KILLING 21.8 Million People Around the World
Or did JEWS cause AIDS?
http://www.who.int/wer/pdf/2000/wer7547.pdf
Global AIDS surveillance
Part I
Global situation of the HIV/AIDS pandemic, end 2000
WHO and UNAIDS have estimated that by the end of 2000,
the number of adults and children living with HIV/AIDS
worldwide will reach 36.1 million people (Map 1). It is
also estimated that during 2000, 5.3 million people (in-
cluding 600 000 children aged <15) became infected. HIV
infections are now almost equally distributed between
men and women, with an estimated 18.2 million men aged
15-49 living with HIV/AIDS.
By the end of 2000, it is estimated that a total of 21.8 million
adults and children will have died because of HIV/AIDS since
the beginning of the epidemic. Mortality due to HIV contin-
ued to increase, with an estimated 3 million deaths during
2000. Deaths in women also continues to increase, accounting
for an estimated 52% of adult deaths due to HIV in 2000.
As of 25 November 2000, a total of 2 312 860 AIDS cases have
been officially reported to WHO (Tabl e 1 ).
Greatest Fraud ever committed by Government on its people
Jack Perrine <[email protected]>
Another marvelous example of what happens when people condone lying
Jack
University Wire: from The Battalion, Texas A & M University
February 18, 1998
HEADLINE: AIDS research raises questions about origins, myths of illness
BYLINE: Stewart Patton, The Battalion, Texas A&M U.
DATELINE: College Station, Texas
News-papers around the globe last week reported that the first known
HIV-virus has been discovered in a blood sample taken from a man in 1959.
This discovery is another episode in the chain of events which former
Harvard professor of biochemistry Charles Thomas calls "the most morally
destructive fraud that has ever been perpetrated on young men and women of
the Western world."
To date, there is still no concrete evidence that HIV causes AIDS, and
researchers continue to ignore the possibility that AIDS may in fact be a
noninfectious disease.
What exactly is AIDS? University of California-Berkeley professor of
molecular biology Peter Duesberg said HIV is now named as the new cause of
thirty previously known diseases, including Kaposi's sarcoma, tuberculosis,
dementia, pneumonia, weight loss, diarrhea and leukemia.
If any of these previously known diseases now occurs in a patient who
has antibodies against HIV (but rarely any HIV), then his or her disease is
diagnosed as AIDS and is blamed on HIV.
With all of the AIDS rhetoric of the past decade, this simple truth may
shock you: there are no citations in any medical journals or books for the
hypothesis that HIV causes AIDS.
Duesberg's statistical evidence and verifiable data have never been
refuted; rather a media ready to pounce on "sex equals death" stories has
ignored him.
Duesberg shows HIV cannot cause AIDS because HIV does not destroy
T-cells in laboratory petri dishes even at thousands of times the
concentration found in humans.
Additionally, none of the 150 chimpanzees injected with HIV have AIDS
-- some approaching two decades of exposure -- while chimps injected with
other known human viral diseases contract the disease in 24 to 36 hours.
While the medical science establishment cannot conclusively prove that
AIDS has an infectious cause, Duesberg shows the many possible
noninfectious causes of the grab-bag of diseases now known as AIDS.
Using standard statistics, he shows that nearly all people who die of
AIDS have been users of heroin, cocaine, AZT (developed for cancer
chemotherapy but abandoned as too toxic), or amyl and butyl nitrates
(popular among homosexuals in the disco era).
Duesberg shows that AIDS does not meet even one of the classical
accepted criteria of an infectious disease.
Unlike conventional infectious diseases, AIDS is nonrandomly restricted
to males, which constitute 95 percent of those infected; there is no active
microbe common to all AIDS patients; no common group of target cells are
rendered nonfunctional; and there is no common, predictable pattern of AIDS
symptoms in patients of different risk groups.
How, then, have scientists come to accept the notion that HIV causes
AIDS? Bryan Ellison, co-author of Inventing the AIDS Virus with Duesberg
claims the Center for Disease Control, a $ 2 billion a year government
agency, has a bias towards epidemics of contagious diseases because of its
"great admiration and respect for the germ theory."
The germ theory of the late 19th century ended the era of infectious
diseases, which now account for less than one percent of all mortality in
the Western world. Because of the great success of virus hunters in curing
infectious diseases, Big Science has a bias towards microbial causes of
disease.
Big death tolls and big funding lead to what Steven Epstein in Impure
Science calls a science-in-haste. AIDS research is research driven by
exigency and in-your-face tactics from AIDS activists, all of which causes
the Center for Disease Control to fall back on what it knows best.
Is AIDS an isolated incident of mistakenly attributing infectious
causes to a noninfectious disease? Certainly not. Scurvy, which scientists
now know is a result of a vitamin-C deficiency, was once thought to be
spread by rats and unsanitary conditions aboard ships. The disease was
completely eradicated, however, once sailors were given daily doses of
limes (hence the sailors' nickname "limey").
Hidden in the annals of forgotten bad science is an epidemic that
anticipated the AIDS epidemic. SMON, a frightening disease that caused
nerve damage and paralysis, raged through Japan in the 1950s.
After nearly 20 years of ineffective virus-hunting, scientists finally
found that SMON is caused by the drug clioquinol, a medication that was
prescribed for stomach cramps. The epidemic's toll officially ended in 1973
with 11,007 victims, including thousands of fatalities.
The Center for Disease Control, which is now a main player in AIDS
research, predicted in 1976 that "swine flu" would devastate the country.
This announcement led to the immunization of 50 million Americans with
a vaccine known to have toxic side effects.
No flu epidemic materialized in the rest of the population, but
thousands of people had nerve damage and paralysis, and dozens died from
the toxic effects of the vaccine.
Over six billion dollars a year is being spent to fight AIDS. People
who test positive for HIV are given death sentences, and junior-high girls
are taught how to put condoms on bananas.
Will AIDS be a repeat of the SMON fiasco? For the sake of the 10,000
AIDS patients that are expected to die in the next year, scientists should
learn from the past and abandon the unproven HIV-AIDS hypothesis.
It is time to find the lime or the clioquinol instead of fruitlessly
chasing HIV.
Health Statistics >
HIV AIDS > Deaths (most recent) by country
Of 147 countries for whom we have AIDS Deaths data, 43 of them reported
NO AIDS DEATHS
These are countries like Norway, Morocco, and Azerbaijan, who have NO
Catholics, and thus no sodomite Catholic priests buggering children.
| Rank | Countries  | Amount  | Date |
|---|
| # 1 | South Africa: | 370,000 | 2003  | |
| = 2 | India: | 310,000 | 2001 | |
| = 2 | Nigeria: | 310,000 | 2003 | |
| # 4 | Zimbabwe: | 170,000 | 2003 | |
| # 5 | Tanzania: | 160,000 | 2003 | |
| # 6 | Kenya: | 150,000 | 2003 | |
| # 7 | Ethiopia: | 120,000 | 2003 | |
| # 8 | Mozambique: | 110,000 | 2003 | |
| # 9 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the: | 100,000 | 2003 | |
| # 10 | Zambia: | 89,000 | 2003 | |
| # 11 | Malawi: | 84,000 | 2003 | |
| # 12 | Uganda: | 78,000 | 2003 | |
| # 13 | Thailand: | 58,000 | 2003 | |
| # 14 | Cameroon: | 49,000 | 2003 | |
| # 15 | C?e d'Ivoire: | 47,000 | 2003 | |
| # 16 | China: | 44,000 | 2003 | |
| # 17 | Botswana: | 33,000 | 2003 | |
| # 18 | Ghana: | 30,000 | 2003 | |
| = 19 | Burkina Faso: | 29,000 | 2003 | |
| = 19 | Lesotho: | 29,000 | 2003 | |
| # 21 | Burundi: | 25,000 | 2003 | |
| # 22 | Haiti: | 24,000 | 2003 | |
| = 23 | Sudan: | 23,000 | 2003 | |
| = 23 | Central African Republic: | 23,000 | 2003 | |
| # 25 | Rwanda: | 22,000 | 2003 | |
| # 26 | Angola: | 21,000 | 2003 | |
| = 27 | Burma: | 20,000 | 2003 | |
| = 27 | Ukraine: | 20,000 | 2003 | |
| # 29 | Chad: | 18,000 | 2003 | |
| # 30 | Swaziland: | 17,000 | 2003 | |
| # 31 | Namibia: | 16,000 | 2003 | |
| = 32 | Brazil: | 15,000 | 2003 | |
| = 32 | Cambodia: | 15,000 | 2003 | |
| # 34 | United States: | 14,000 | 2003 | |
| # 35 | Mali: | 12,000 | 2003 | |
| # 36 | Sierra Leone: | 11,000 | 2001 | |
| # 37 | Togo: | 10,000 | 2003 | |
| # 38 | Congo, Republic of the: | 9,700 | 2003 | |
| = 39 | Vietnam: | 9,000 | 2003 | |
| = 39 | Russia: | 9,000 | 2001 | |
| = 39 | Guinea: | 9,000 | 2003 | |
| # 42 | Dominican Republic: | 7,900 | 2003 | |
| # 43 | Madagascar: | 7,500 | 2003 | |
| # 44 | Liberia: | 7,200 | 2003 | |
| # 45 | Eritrea: | 6,300 | 2003 | |
| = 46 | Benin: | 5,800 | 2003 | |
| = 46 | Guatemala: | 5,800 | 2003 | |
| # 48 | Mexico: | 5,000 | 2003 | |
| # 49 | Pakistan: | 4,900 | 2003 | |
| # 50 | Niger: | 4,800 | 2003 | |
| # 51 | Peru: | 4,200 | 2003 | |
| = 52 | Venezuela: | 4,100 | 2003 | |
| = 52 | Honduras: | 4,100 | 2003 | |
| # 54 | Colombia: | 3,600 | 2003 | |
| # 55 | Senegal: | 3,500 | 2003 | |
| # 56 | Nepal: | 3,100 | 2003 | |
| # 57 | Gabon: | 3,000 | 2003 | |
| # 58 | Indonesia: | 2,400 | 2003 | |
| # 59 | Spain: | 2,300 | 2001 | |
| # 60 | El Salvador: | 2,200 | 2003 | |
| # 61 | Malaysia: | 2,000 | 2003 | |
| = 62 | Trinidad and Tobago: | 1,900 | 2003 | |
| = 62 | Panama: | 1,900 | 2001 | |
| # 64 | Ecuador: | 1,700 | 2003 | |
| = 65 | Argentina: | 1,500 | 2003 | |
| = 65 | Canada: | 1,500 | 2003 | |
| # 67 | Chile: | 1,400 | 2003 | |
| # 68 | Guinea-Bissau: | 1,200 | 2001 | |
| = 69 | Italy: | 1,100 | 2001 | |
| = 69 | Guyana: | 1,100 | 2003 | |
| = 71 | Belarus: | 1,000 | 2001 | |
| = 71 | Portugal: | 1,000 | 2001 | |
| = 73 | Jamaica: | 900 | 2003 | |
| = 73 | Costa Rica: | 900 | 2003 | |
| = 75 | Iran: | 800 | 2003 | |
| = 75 | France: | 800 | 2001 | |
| # 77 | Philippines: | 720 | 2001 | |
| # 78 | Egypt: | 700 | 2003 | |
| # 79 | Djibouti: | 690 | 2003 | |
| # 80 | Germany: | 660 | 2001 | |
| # 81 | Bangladesh: | 650 | 2001 | |
| = 82 | Mauritania: | 610 | 2001 | |
| = 82 | Bahamas, The: | 610 | 2001 | |
| = 84 | Gambia, The: | 600 | 2003 | |
| = 84 | Papua New Guinea: | 600 | 2003 | |
| = 84 | Paraguay: | 600 | 2003 | |
| # 87 | Japan: | 500 | 2003 | |
| # 88 | United Kingdom: | 460 | 2001 | |
| # 89 | Nicaragua: | 400 | 2001 | |
| # 90 | Equatorial Guinea: | 370 | 2001 | |
| # 91 | Romania: | 350 | 2001 | |
| # 92 | Suriname: | 330 | 2001 | |
| # 93 | Belize: | 300 | 2001 | |
| # 94 | Bolivia: | 290 | 2001 | |
| = 95 | Sri Lanka: | 250 | 2001 | |
| = 95 | Barbados: | 250 | 2001 | |
| # 97 | Korea, South: | 220 | 2001 | |
| # 98 | Singapore: | 140 | 2001 | |
| # 99 | Cuba: | 120 | 2001 | |
| # 100 | Netherlands: | 110 | 2001 | |
| = 101 | Israel: | 100 | 2001 | |
| = 101 | Bulgaria: | 100 | 2001 | |
| = 101 | Bosnia and Herzegovina: | 100 | 2001 | |
| = 101 | Poland: | 100 | 2001 | |
| Total: | 2,832,030 | |
Health Statistics >
HIV AIDS > People living with HIV AIDS (per capita) (most recent) by country
| # 1 | Swaziland: | 199 per 1,000 people | |
| # 2 | Botswana: | 197.566 per 1,000 people | |
| # 3 | Lesotho: | 177.781 per 1,000 people | |
| # 4 | Zimbabwe: | 141.757 per 1,000 people | |
| # 5 | South Africa: | 115.623 per 1,000 people | |
| # 6 | Namibia: | 108.812 per 1,000 people | |
| # 7 | Zambia: | 81.48 per 1,000 people | |
| # 8 | Malawi: | 72.942 per 1,000 people | |
| # 9 | Mozambique: | 68.234 per 1,000 people | |
| # 10 | Central African Republic: | 66.046 per 1,000 people | |
| # 11 | Tanzania: | 43.775 per 1,000 people | |
| # 12 | Kenya: | 36.659 per 1,000 people | |
| # 13 | Sierra Leone: | 36.304 per 1,000 people | |
| # 14 | Gabon: | 35.786 per 1,000 people | |
| # 15 | Cameroon: | 35.559 per 1,000 people | |
| # 16 | Burundi: | 35.528 per 1,000 people | |
| # 17 | Haiti: | 33.786 per 1,000 people | |
| # 18 | C?e d'Ivoire: | 32.379 per 1,000 people | |
| # 19 | Liberia: | 31.032 per 1,000 people | |
| # 20 | Rwanda: | 28.546 per 1,000 people | |
| # 21 | Nigeria: | 26.734 per 1,000 people | |
| # 22 | Burkina Faso: | 24.159 per 1,000 people | |
| # 23 | Congo, Republic of the: | 23.877 per 1,000 people | |
| # 24 | Trinidad and Tobago: | 22.355 per 1,000 people | |
| # 25 | Chad: | 21.898 per 1,000 people | |
| # 26 | Ethiopia: | 21.862 per 1,000 people | |
| # 27 | Uganda: | 21.106 per 1,000 people | |
| # 28 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the: | 20.284 per 1,000 people | |
| # 29 | Togo: | 18.849 per 1,000 people | |
| # 30 | Bahamas, The: | 17.809 per 1,000 people | |
| # 31 | Ghana: | 16.5 per 1,000 people | |
| # 32 | Guinea: | 16.146 per 1,000 people | |
| # 33 | Angola: | 15.95 per 1,000 people | |
| # 34 | Eritrea: | 14.802 per 1,000 people | |
| # 35 | Guyana: | 14.686 per 1,000 people | |
| # 36 | Belize: | 13.153 per 1,000 people | |
| # 37 | Equatorial Guinea: | 12.841 per 1,000 people | |
| # 38 | Cambodia: | 12.563 per 1,000 people | |
| # 39 | Guinea-Bissau: | 12.089 per 1,000 people | |
| # 40 | Sudan: | 11.916 per 1,000 people | |
| # 41 | Djibouti: | 11.898 per 1,000 people | |
| # 42 | Suriname: | 11.886 per 1,000 people | |
| # 43 | Mali: | 10.992 per 1,000 people | |
| # 44 | Dominican Republic: | 9.586 per 1,000 people | |
| # 45 | Barbados: | 9.321 per 1,000 people | |
| # 46 | Honduras: | 9.14 per 1,000 people | |
| # 47 | Thailand: | 9.027 per 1,000 people | |
| # 48 | Benin: | 8.587 per 1,000 people | |
| # 49 | Jamaica: | 8.364 per 1,000 people | |
| # 50 | Madagascar: | 7.943 per 1,000 people | |
| # 51 | Ukraine: | 7.395 per 1,000 people | |
| # 52 | Burma: | 6.672 per 1,000 people | |
| # 53 | Guatemala: | 6.501 per 1,000 people | |
| # 54 | Somalia: | 5.949 per 1,000 people | |
| # 55 | Russia: | 5.892 per 1,000 people | |
| # 56 | Estonia: | 5.763 per 1,000 people | |
| # 57 | Niger: | 5.363 per 1,000 people | |
| # 58 | Panama: | 5.13 per 1,000 people | |
| # 59 | India: | 4.94 per 1,000 people | |
| # 60 | Gambia, The: | 4.73 per 1,000 people | |
| # 61 | Venezuela: | 4.609 per 1,000 people | |
| # 62 | El Salvador: | 4.365 per 1,000 people | |
| # 63 | Colombia: | 4.35 per 1,000 people | |
| # 64 | Senegal: | 3.957 per 1,000 people | |
| # 65 | Brazil: | 3.638 per 1,000 people | |
| # 66 | Argentina: | 3.488 per 1,000 people | |
| # 67 | Spain: | 3.438 per 1,000 people | |
| # 68 | Mauritania: | 3.284 per 1,000 people | |
| # 69 | United States: | 3.267 per 1,000 people | |
| # 70 | Latvia: | 3.222 per 1,000 people | |
| # 71 | Peru: | 3.019 per 1,000 people | |
| # 72 | Costa Rica: | 2.873 per 1,000 people | |
| # 73 | Paraguay: | 2.864 per 1,000 people | |
| # 74 | Papua New Guinea: | 2.829 per 1,000 people | |
| # 75 | Vietnam: | 2.719 per 1,000 people | |
| # 76 | Italy: | 2.457 per 1,000 people | |
| # 77 | Nepal: | 2.442 per 1,000 people | |
| # 78 | Portugal: | 2.137 per 1,000 people | |
| # 79 | Malaysia: | 2.128 per 1,000 people | |
| # 80 | France: | 1.995 per 1,000 people | |
| # 81 | Libya: | 1.848 per 1,000 people | |
| # 82 | Uruguay: | 1.814 per 1,000 people | |
| # 83 | Switzerland: | 1.798 per 1,000 people | |
| # 84 | Greenland: | 1.783 per 1,000 people | |
| # 85 | Canada: | 1.77 per 1,000 people | |
| # 86 | Cape Verde: | 1.68 per 1,000 people | |
| # 87 | Ecuador: | 1.634 per 1,000 people | |
| # 88 | Chile: | 1.63 per 1,000 people | |
| # 89 | Mexico: | 1.584 per 1,000 people | |
| # 90 | Belarus: | 1.504 per 1,000 people | |
| # 91 | Moldova: | 1.345 per 1,000 people | |
| # 92 | Nicaragua: | 1.256 per 1,000 people | |
| # 93 | Austria: | 1.232 per 1,000 people | |
| # 94 | Serbia and Montenegro: | 1.231 per 1,000 people | |
| # 95 | Netherlands: | 1.184 per 1,000 people | |
| # 96 | Kazakhstan: | 1.11 per 1,000 people | |
| # 97 | Singapore: | 0.98 per 1,000 people | |
| # 98 | Belgium: | 0.964 per 1,000 people | |
| # 99 | Denmark: | 0.928 per 1,000 people | |
| # 100 | United Kingdom: | 0.857 per 1,000 people | |
| # 101 | Armenia: | 0.856 per 1,000 people | |
| # 102 | Greece: | 0.831 per 1,000 people | |
| # 103 | Kyrgyzstan: | 0.774 per 1,000 people | |
| # 104 | Iceland: | 0.772 per 1,000 people | |
| # 105 | Ireland: | 0.724 per 1,000 people | |
| # 106 | Fiji: | 0.72 per 1,000 people | |
| # 107 | Lebanon: | 0.715 per 1,000 people | |
| # 108 | Australia: | 0.704 per 1,000 people | |
| # 109 | Georgia: | 0.657 per 1,000 people | |
| # 110 | China: | 0.652 per 1,000 people | |
| # 111 | Yemen: | 0.648 per 1,000 people | |
| # 112 | Mauritius: | 0.583 per 1,000 people | |
| # 113 | Bolivia: | 0.555 per 1,000 people | |
| # 114 | Oman: | 0.526 per 1,000 people | |
| # 115 | Pakistan: | 0.523 per 1,000 people | |
| # 116 | Germany: | 0.522 per 1,000 people | |
| # 117 | Morocco: | 0.52 per 1,000 people | |
| # 118 | Indonesia: | 0.512 per 1,000 people | |
| # 119 | Israel: | 0.49 per 1,000 people | |
| # 120 | Iran: | 0.48 per 1,000 people | |
| # 121 | Norway: | 0.465 per 1,000 people | |
| # 122 | Uzbekistan: | 0.43 per 1,000 people | |
| # 123 | Sweden: | 0.405 per 1,000 people | |
| # 124 | Hong Kong: | 0.382 per 1,000 people | |
| # 125 | Lithuania: | 0.376 per 1,000 people | |
| # 126 | Poland: | 0.367 per 1,000 people | |
| # 127 | New Zealand: | 0.349 per 1,000 people | |
| # 128 | Laos: | 0.31 per 1,000 people | |
| = 129 | Romania: | 0.294 per 1,000 people | |
| = 129 | Cuba: | 0.294 per 1,000 people | |
| # 131 | Finland: | 0.288 per 1,000 people | |
| # 132 | Algeria: | 0.286 per 1,000 people | |
| # 133 | Hungary: | 0.275 per 1,000 people | |
| # 134 | Czech Republic: | 0.245 per 1,000 people | |
| # 135 | Bosnia and Herzegovina: | 0.23 per 1,000 people | |
| # 136 | Sri Lanka: | 0.187 per 1,000 people | |
| # 137 | Egypt: | 0.175 per 1,000 people | |
| # 138 | Korea, South: | 0.173 per 1,000 people | |
| # 139 | Azerbaijan: | 0.17 per 1,000 people | |
| # 140 | Slovenia: | 0.141 per 1,000 people | |
| # 141 | Jordan: | 0.116 per 1,000 people | |
| # 142 | Philippines: | 0.112 per 1,000 people | |
| # 143 | Tunisia: | 0.102 per 1,000 people | |
| # 144 | Bangladesh: | 0.099 per 1,000 people | |
| # 145 | Japan: | 0.094 per 1,000 people | |
| # 146 | Croatia: | 0.045 per 1,000 people | |
| # 147 | Bulgaria: | 0.044 per 1,000 people | |
Why would anyone quote the CIA aids death list when the US wasn't even listed,
and then claim victory for their cause? And why would they claim that I "would
have straight people to thank, since they comprise the majority of [AIDS
deaths]" when the following UN report states that heterosexuals are "less than a
fraction of one percent"?
The US ranks 18th in the world in AIDS deaths, right up there with third world
countries like Ghana, Cameroon, and Vietnam, with 10 times as many AIDS deaths
as Spain, France, Panama, El Salvador, and Morocco.
This doesn't even include 112 of the 178 countries in the world aren't even on
this list who never even had an AIDS death.
|
1 |
South Africa |
310,000 |
2009 |
|
|
2 |
Nigeria |
220,000 |
2009 |
|
|
3 |
India |
170,000 |
2009 |
|
|
4 |
Tanzania |
86,000 |
2009 |
|
|
5 |
Zimbabwe |
83,000 |
2009 |
|
|
6 |
Kenya |
80,000 |
2009 |
|
|
7 |
Mozambique |
74,000 |
2009 |
|
|
8 |
Uganda |
64,000 |
2009 |
|
|
9 |
Malawi |
51,000 |
2009 |
|
|
10 |
Zambia |
45,000 |
2009 |
|
|
11 |
Cameroon |
37,000 |
2009 |
|
|
12 |
Cote d'Ivoire |
36,000 |
2009 |
|
|
13 |
Thailand |
28,000 |
2009 |
|
|
14 |
China |
26,000 |
2009 |
|
|
15 |
Ukraine |
24,000 |
2009 |
|
|
=16 |
Ghana |
18,000 |
2009 |
|
|
=16 |
Burma |
18,000 |
2009 |
|
|
18 |
United States |
17,000 |
2009 |
|
|
19 |
Burundi |
15,000 |
2009 |
|
|
=20 |
Vietnam |
14,000 |
2009 |
|
|
=20 |
Colombia |
14,000 |
2009 |
|
|
=20 |
Lesotho |
14,000 |
2009 |
|
|
23 |
Sudan |
12,000 |
2009 |
|
|
=24 |
Central African Republic |
11,000 |
2009 |
|
|
=24 |
Angola |
11,000 |
2009 |
|
|
=24 |
Chad |
11,000 |
2009 |
|
|
27 |
Indonesia |
8,300 |
2009 |
|
|
28 |
Togo |
7,700 |
2009 |
|
|
=29 |
Haiti |
7,100 |
2009 |
|
|
=29 |
Burkina Faso |
7,100 |
2009 |
|
|
31 |
Swaziland |
7,000 |
2009 |
|
|
32 |
Namibia |
6,700 |
2009 |
|
|
33 |
Iran |
6,400 |
2009 |
|
|
=34 |
Malaysia |
5,800 |
2009 |
|
|
=34 |
Botswana |
5,800 |
2009 |
|
|
=34 |
Pakistan |
5,800 |
2009 |
|
|
37 |
Congo,
Republic of the |
5,100 |
2009 |
|
|
38 |
Peru |
5,000 |
2009 |
|
|
=39 |
Guinea |
4,700 |
2009 |
|
|
=39 |
Nepal |
4,700 |
2009 |
|
|
41 |
Mali |
4,400 |
2009 |
|
|
42 |
Niger |
4,300 |
2009 |
|
|
43 |
Rwanda |
4,100 |
2009 |
|
|
44 |
Liberia |
3,600 |
2009 |
|
|
45 |
Cambodia |
3,100 |
2009 |
|
|
46 |
Argentina |
2,900 |
2009 |
|
|
47 |
Sierra Leone |
2,800 |
2009 |
|
|
48 |
Benin |
2,700 |
2009 |
|
|
=49 |
Senegal |
2,600 |
2009 |
|
|
=49 |
Guatemala |
2,600 |
2009 |
|
|
51 |
Honduras |
2,500 |
2009 |
|
|
52 |
Gabon |
2,400 |
2009 |
|
|
53 |
Dominican Republic |
2,300 |
2009 |
|
|
54 |
Ecuador |
2,200 |
2009 |
|
|
=55 |
Eritrea |
1,700 |
2009 |
|
|
=55 |
Madagascar |
1,700 |
2009 |
|
|
=55 |
France |
1,700 |
2009 |
|
|
=58 |
Somalia |
1,600 |
2009 |
|
|
=58 |
Spain |
1,600 |
2009 |
|
|
60 |
Panama |
1,500 |
2009 |
|
|
61 |
El Salvador |
1,400 |
2009 |
|
|
62 |
Papua New Guinea |
1,300 |
2009 |
|
|
=63 |
Morocco |
1,200 |
2009 |
|
|
=63 |
Guinea-Bissau |
1,200 |
2009 |
|
|
=63 |
Jamaica |
1,200 |
2009 |
|
|
66 |
Djibouti |
1,000 |
2009 |
|
With the US having had as many as 52,000 AIDS deaths annually, we would rank
4th in the world in the total number of AIDS deaths, right behind Nigeria, South
Africa, and India. But even though India had 2.4 times as many AIDS deaths, they
also have 4.3 times the population, which means that OUR rate of AIDS deaths is
80% higher than India.
|
RANK |
COUNTRY |
HIV/AIDS - DEATHS |
DATE OF INFORMATION |
|
1 |
NIGERIA |
174,300 |
2014 EST. |
|
2 |
SOUTH AFRICA |
138,400 |
2014 EST. |
|
3 |
INDIA |
127,200 |
2013 EST. |
|
4 |
TANZANIA |
46,100 |
2014 EST. |
|
5 |
MOZAMBIQUE |
44,900 |
2014 EST. |
|
6 |
ZIMBABWE |
38,600 |
2014 EST. |
|
7 |
CAMEROON |
34,200 |
2014 EST. |
|
8 |
INDONESIA |
33,700 |
2014 EST. |
|
9 |
KENYA |
33,000 |
2014 EST. |
|
10 |
UGANDA |
32,900 |
2014 EST. |
|
11 |
MALAWI |
32,600 |
2014 EST. |
|
12 |
CONGO, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE |
24,100 |
2014 EST. |
|
13 |
ETHIOPIA |
23,400 |
2014 EST. |
|
14 |
COTE D'IVOIRE |
21,800 |
2014 EST. |
|
15 |
THAILAND |
19,400 |
2014 EST. |
|
16 |
ZAMBIA |
18,900 |
2014 EST. |
|
17 |
BRAZIL |
15,800 |
2013 EST. |
|
18 |
UKRAINE |
13,400 |
2013 EST. |
|
19 |
SOUTH SUDAN |
12,700 |
2014 EST. |
|
20 |
ANGOLA |
11,770 |
2014 EST. |
|
21 |
CHAD |
11,700 |
2014 EST. |
|
22 |
VIETNAM |
10,600 |
2014 EST. |
|
23 |
BURMA |
10,100 |
2014 EST. |
|
24 |
CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC |
9,900 |
2014 EST. |
|
25 |
LESOTHO |
9,300 |
2014 EST. |
|
26 |
GHANA |
9,200 |
2014 EST. |
|
27 |
MALAYSIA |
9,000 |
2014 EST. |
|
28 |
MEXICO |
6,000 |
2014 EST. |
|
29 |
MALI |
5,300 |
2014 EST. |
|
30 |
BOTSWANA |
5,100 |
2014 EST. |
|
31 |
NAMIBIA |
5,100 |
2014 EST. |
|
32 |
COLOMBIA |
4,700 |
2014 EST. |
|
33 |
VENEZUELA |
4,400 |
2013 EST. |
|
34 |
CONGO, REPUBLIC OF THE |
4,400 |
2014 EST. |
|
35 |
TOGO |
4,300 |
2014 EST. |
|
36 |
IRAN |
4,100 |
2014 EST. |
|
37 |
BURUNDI |
3,900 |
2014 EST. |
|
38 |
BURKINA FASO |
3,800 |
2014 EST. |
|
39 |
GUINEA |
3,800 |
2014 EST. |
|
40 |
HAITI |
3,800 |
2014 EST. |
|
41 |
SWAZILAND |
3,500 |
2014 EST. |
|
42 |
NIGER |
3,400 |
2014 EST. |
|
43 |
MADAGASCAR |
3,200 |
2014 EST. |
|
44 |
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC |
3,100 |
2014 EST. |
|
45 |
RWANDA |
3,000 |
2014 EST. |
|
46 |
SUDAN |
2,900 |
2014 EST. |
|
47 |
PAKISTAN |
2,800 |
2014 EST. |
|
48 |
SIERRA LEONE |
2,700 |
2014 EST. |
|
49 |
CAMBODIA |
2,600 |
2014 EST. |
|
50 |
NEPAL |
2,600 |
2014 EST. |
|
51 |
PERU |
2,500 |
2014 EST. |
|
52 |
SENEGAL |
2,400 |
2014 EST. |
|
53 |
BENIN |
2,400 |
2014 EST. |
|
54 |
SOMALIA |
2,400 |
2014 EST. |
|
55 |
UZBEKISTAN |
2,200 |
2014 EST. |
|
56 |
LIBERIA |
2,000 |
2014 EST. |
|
57 |
GUINEA-BISSAU |
1,900 |
2014 EST. |
|
58 |
GUATEMALA |
1,700 |
2014 EST. |
|
59 |
FRANCE |
1,500 |
2013 EST. |
|
60 |
ARGENTINA |
1,500 |
2014 EST. |
|
61 |
GABON |
1,500 |
2014 EST. |
|
62 |
JAMAICA |
1,300 |
2014 EST. |
|
63 |
ECUADOR |
1,200 |
2014 EST. |
|
64 |
HONDURAS |
1,200 |
2014 EST. |
|
65 |
MOROCCO |
1,100 |
2014 EST. |
|
66 |
MAURITANIA |
1,100 |
2014 EST. |
|
67 |
BELARUS |
1,000 |
2014 EST. |
|
68 |
GAMBIA, THE |
900 |
2014 EST. |
|
69 |
PAPUA NEW GUINEA |
900 |
2014 EST. |
|
70 |
SPAIN |
800 |
2013 EST. |
|
71 |
EQUATORIAL GUINEA |
800 |
2014 EST. |
|
72 |
MOLDOVA |
800 |
2014 EST. |
|
73 |
TAJIKISTAN |
700 |
2014 EST. |
|
74 |
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO |
700 |
2013 EST. |
|
75 |
BANGLADESH |
700 |
2014 EST. |
|
76 |
CHILE |
700 |
2014 EST. |
|
77 |
BOLIVIA |
700 |
2014 EST. |
|
78 |
ERITREA |
700 |
2014 EST. |
|
79 |
URUGUAY |
600 |
2014 EST. |
|
80 |
DJIBOUTI |
600 |
2014 EST. |
|
81 |
PANAMA |
600 |
2014 EST. |
|
82 |
UNITED KINGDOM |
600 |
2013 EST. |
|
83 |
PHILIPPINES |
500 |
2014 EST. |
|
84 |
ROMANIA |
500 |
2013 EST. |
|
85 |
BAHAMAS, THE |
500 |
2013 EST. |
|
86 |
LAOS |
500 |
2014 EST. |
|
87 |
KAZAKHSTAN |
500 |
2014 EST. |
|
88 |
MAURITIUS |
500 |
2014 EST. |
|
89 |
CANADA |
400 |
2013 EST. |
|
90 |
PARAGUAY |
400 |
2014 EST. |
|
91 |
NICARAGUA |
400 |
2014 EST. |
|
92 |
AZERBAIJAN |
400 |
2014 EST. |
|
93 |
GERMANY |
400 |
2013 EST. |
|
94 |
EL SALVADOR |
400 |
2014 EST. |
|
95 |
KYRGYZSTAN |
400 |
2014 EST. |
|
96 |
YEMEN |
300 |
2014 EST. |
|
97 |
AFGHANISTAN |
300 |
2014 EST. |
|
98 |
EGYPT |
300 |
2014 EST. |
|
99 |
SWITZERLAND |
300 |
2013 EST. |
|
100 |
SURINAME |
200 |
2014 EST. |
|
101 |
ALGERIA |
200 |
2014 EST. |
|
102 |
ARMENIA |
200 |
2014 EST. |
|
103 |
COSTA RICA |
200 |
2014 EST. |
|
104 |
TUNISIA |
100 |
2014 EST. |
|
105 |
AUSTRALIA |
100 |
2013 EST. |
|
106 |
MACEDONIA |
100 |
2013 EST. |
|
107 |
HUNGARY |
100 |
2013 EST. |
|
108 |
SWEDEN |
100 |
2014 EST. |
|
109 |
SLOVENIA |
100 |
2014 EST. |
|
110 |
SYRIA |
100 |
2014 EST. |
|
111 |
SERBIA |
100 |
2013 EST. |
|
112 |
NORWAY |
100 |
2014 EST. |
|
113 |
MALDIVES |
100 |
2013 EST. |
|
114 |
OMAN |
100 |
2014 EST. |
|
115 |
MONGOLIA |
100 |
�you have made it abudantly clear that you live in a fantasy world where only gays have aids and its sad.�
I am only dealing in FACTS. What is sad, VERY sad, is that gays don't understand just how serious it is to die of AIDS, and how much of a risk of contracting AIDS gay sex is.
It's your OWN figures which show that gays are more than TWO THOUSAND times more likely to get AIDS than heterosexuals, in ONLY the 29 states with the highest percentage of heterosexuals who die of AIDS. When the other 21 states which have had a STATISTICAL ZERO PERCENT of AIDS deaths, homosexual or heterosexual, are factored in, then the figures for the US will match the worldwide AIDS estimate of "less than a fraction of one percent".
IF that means 0.5%, then 99.5% of AIDS deaths are homosexuals. And then you can focus in on just how dramatic the difference is:
Homosexuals are 99.5% of AIDS deaths and 0.37% of the population, and are thus over-represented by 269X.
Heterosexuals are 0.5% of the AIDS deaths and 99.63% of the population and thus are under-represented by 0.005X.
The UN figure means that homosexuals are 53,800 TIMES more likely to die of AIDS than heterosexuals.
You should ask why the CDC so studiously ignore THAT figure.