|
Forum
Donate
Search
Subscribe
jews/911
Feedback
dna
RCC
AIDS
Home
Fathers
Surveys
Holocaust
IQ
14th Amdt
19th Amdt
Israelites
NWO
Homicide
Blacks
Whites
Signatory
Talmud
Watchman
Gaelic
TRAITORS
Medicine?
|
Happy Thanksgiving to Our White BRETHREN
If a congressman or congresswoman today were to stand up in our halls of
justice and say something like "it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the
providence
of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and humbly
to implore His protection and favor", our current jew run Supreme Court would go
postal. But this is EXACTLY what George Washington said when he
established NATIONAL Thanksgiving AND PRAYER to Almighty God on October 3, 1789,
two hundred and twenty Thanksgivings ago.
At the time he said that, Mexicans were literally our mortal enemies
and Mr. Washington would never have considered this Prayer to Almighty God
to ever apply to them. Same for Blacks who were mostly slaves, and the
notion that they would ever become citizens could not have been further from
his mind. Women didn't vote so the Late Great Failed Welfare State
wasn't even in his wildest nightmare.
And you couldn't even call him a racist, because that term wouldn't
even be coined until a century and a half later in 1939 by H.G. Wells, and
wouldn't even have the negative connotation it now has until almost another
half century after that. Ditto for John Adams and Thomas Jefferson who
could never conceive that the US Constitution would ever apply to anyone
other than their posterity, which by definition
is ONLY fellow White MEN, or their brethren.
So in keeping with the spirit and intent of the original US
Constitution and "Thanksgiving
AND PRAYER to Almighty God", HAPPY THANKSGIVING ONLY to our brethren,
fellow WHITE men.
The
first American Thanksgiving was celebrated, of course, not in Massechussetts in
1621, but two years earlier at Berkely Hundred, Virginia, 4, December,
1619. In the London company's orders to be opened upon reaching Virginia
was this injunction:
"
We ordaine that the day of our ships arrivall...In the land of Virginia
shall be yearly and perpetually kept holy as a day of thanksgiving to Almighty
God."
That
idea they took from the Bible especially Deut. 8:10-20 and Deut. 14: 22-26.

The following
Proclamation can be found in Vol. I of the eleven
volume set titled A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the
Presidents 1789-1908 by James D. Richardson, a representative from
the State of Tennessee, published by Bureau of National Literature
and Art 1908. PROCLAMATION A NATIONAL THANKSGIVING [From Sparks's
Washington, Vol. XII. p. 119.]

Whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence
of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits,
and humbly to implore His protection and favor; and Whereas both
Houses of Congress have, by their joint committee, requested me "to
recommend to the people of the United States a day of public
thanksgiving and prayer, to be observed by acknowledging with
grateful hearts the many and signal favors of Almighty God,
especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a
form of government for their safety and happiness:" Now, therefore, I
do recommend and assign Thursday, the 26th day of November next, to
be devoted by the people of these States to the service of that great
and glorious Being who is the beneficent author of all the good that
was, that is, or that will be; that we may then all unite in
rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks for His kind care
and protection of the people of this country previous to their
becoming a nation; for the signal and manifold mercies and the
favorable interpositions of His providence in the course and
conclusion of the late war; for the great degree of tranquillity,
union, and plenty which we have since enjoyed; for the peaceable and
rational manner in which we have been enabled to establish
constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and
particularly the national one now lately instituted; for the civil
and religious liberty with which we are blessed, and the means we
have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and, in general,
for all the great and various favors which He has been pleased to
confer upon us. And also that we may then unite in most humbly
offering our prayers and supplications to the great Lord and Ruler of
Nations, and beseech Him to pardon our national and other
transgressions; to enable us all, whether in public or private
stations, to perform our several and relative duties properly and
punctually; to render our National Government a blessing to all the
people by constantly being a Government of wise, just, and
constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed;
to protect and guide all sovereigns and nations (especially such as
have shown kindness to us), and to bless them with good governments,
peace, and concord; to promote the knowledge and practice of true
religion and virtue, and the increase of science among them and us;
and generally, to grant unto all mankind such a degree of temporal
prosperity as He alone knows to be best. Given under my hand, at the
city of New York, the 3d day of October, A.D. 1789. Go. Washington.
VI. Religion and the Federal Government
http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/religion/rel06-2.html
In response to
widespread sentiment that to survive the United States needed a stronger
federal government, a convention met in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787
and on September 17 adopted the Constitution of the United States. Aside
from Article VI, which stated that "no religious Test shall ever be required
as Qualification" for federal office holders, the Constitution said little
about religion. Its reserve troubled two groups of Americans--those who
wanted the new instrument of government to give faith a larger role and
those who feared that it would do so. This latter group, worried that the
Constitution did not prohibit the kind of state-supported religion that had
flourished in some colonies, exerted pressure on the members of the First
Federal Congress. In September 1789 the Congress adopted the First Amendment
to the Constitution, which, when ratified by the required number of states
in December 1791, forbade Congress to make any law "respecting an
establishment of religion."
The first two Presidents of the United States were patrons of
religion--George Washington was an Episcopal vestryman, and John Adams
described himself as "a church going animal." Both offered strong rhetorical
support for religion. In his Farewell Address of September 1796, Washington
called religion, as the source of morality, "a necessary spring of popular
government," while Adams claimed that statesmen "may plan and speculate for
Liberty, but it is Religion and Morality alone, which can establish the
Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand." Thomas Jefferson and
James Madison, the third and fourth Presidents, are generally considered
less hospitable to religion than their predecessors, but evidence presented
in this section shows that, while in office, both offered religion powerful
symbolic support.
RELIGION AND THE CONSTITUTION
Franklin Requests Prayers in the Constitutional Convention
Benjamin Franklin delivered this famous speech, asking that the
Convention begin each day's session with prayers, at a particularly
contentious period, when it appeared that the Convention might break
up over its failure to resolve the dispute between the large and
small states over representation in the new government. The eighty
one year old Franklin asserted that "the longer I live, the more
convincing proofs I see of this Truth--that God governs in the
Affairs of Men." "I also believe," Franklin continued, that "without
his concurring Aid, we shall succeed in this political Building no
better than the Builders of Babel." Franklin's motion failed,
ostensibly because the Convention had no funds to pay local
clergymen to act as chaplains.
Speech
to the Constitutional Convention, June 28, 1787
Benjamin Franklin, Holograph manuscript
Manuscript Division,
Library of Congress (145)
Prohibition of Religious Tests
The language prohibiting religious tests as a qualification for
federal office holders, ultimately incorporated into Article Six of
the Constitution, was proposed by Charles Pinckney of South Carolina
on August 20, 1787, and adopted by the full Convention on August 30.
Here we see the language as it was added to the first working draft
of the Constitution, the so-called Committee of Detail report of
August 6, 1787, by the Convention secretary, William Jackson.
Constitution of the United States (William Jackson Copy), Committee
of Detail report
Broadside, August 6, 1787
Manuscript Division, Library of
Congress (146) |
When the Constitution was submitted to
the American public, "many pious people" complained that the
document had slighted God, for it contained "no recognition of his
mercies to us . . . or even of his existence." The Constitution was
reticent about religion for two reasons: first, many delegates were
committed federalists, who believed that the power to legislate on
religion, if it existed at all, lay within the domain of the state,
not the national, governments; second, the delegates believed that
it would be a tactical mistake to introduce such a politically
controversial issue as religion into the Constitution. The only
"religious clause" in the document--the proscription of religious
tests as qualifications for federal office in Article Six--was
intended to defuse controversy by disarming potential critics who
might claim religious discrimination in eligibility for public
office.
That religion was not otherwise addressed in the Constitution did
not make it an "irreligious" document any more than the Articles of
Confederation was an "irreligious" document. The Constitution dealt
with the church precisely as the Articles had, thereby maintaining,
at the national level, the religious status quo. In neither document
did the people yield any explicit power to act in the field of
religion. But the absence of expressed powers did not prevent either
the Continental-Confederation Congress or the Congress under the
Constitution from sponsoring a program to support general,
nonsectarian religion.
|
RELIGION AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS
| Many Americans were disappointed that
the Constitution did not contain a bill of rights that would
explicitly enumerate the rights of American citizens and enable
courts and public opinion to protect these rights from an oppressive
government. Supporters of a bill of rights permitted the
Constitution to be adopted with the understanding that the first
Congress under the new government would attempt to add a bill of
rights.
James Madison took the lead in steering such a bill through the
First Federal Congress, which convened in the spring of 1789. The
Virginia Ratifying Convention and Madison's constituents, among whom
were large numbers of Baptists who wanted freedom of religion
secured, expected him to push for a bill of rights. On September 28,
1789, both houses of Congress voted to send twelve amendments to the
states. In December 1791, those ratified by the requisite three
fourths of the states became the first ten amendments to the
Constitution. Religion was addressed in the First Amendment in the
following familiar words: "Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof." In notes for his June 8, 1789, speech introducing the Bill
of Rights, Madison indicated his opposition to a "national"
religion. Most Americans agreed that the federal government must not
pick out one religion and give it exclusive financial and legal
support.
|
Proposed Constitutional Amendments
The Virginia Ratifying Convention approved the Constitution with the
understanding that the state's representatives in the First Federal
Congress would try to procure amendments that the Convention
recommended. The twentieth proposed amendment deals with religion;
it is an adaptation of the final article in the Virginia Declaration
of Rights of 1776 with this additional phrase: "that no particular
religious sect or society ought to be favored or established by Law
in preference to others."
Proposed
amendments to the Constitution of the United States
[page one] -
[page
two] -
[page
three] -
[page
four]
Virginia Ratifying Convention, Broadside, June 25, 1788
Rare Book and Special
Collections Division,
Library of Congress (147)
Baptist Preacher's Objections to the Constitution
The influential Baptist preacher, John Leland, wrote a letter,
containing ten objections to the Federal Constitution, and sent it
to Colonel Thomas Barbour, an opponent of the Constitution in James
Madison's Orange County district. Leland's objections were copied by
Captain Joseph Spencer, one of Madison's Baptist friends, and sent
to Madison so that he could refute the arguments. Leland's final
objection was that the new constitution did not sufficiently secure
"What is dearest of all---Religious Liberty." His chief worry
was "if a Majority of Congress with the President favour one System
more than another, they may oblige all others to pay to the support
of their System as much as they please."
Objections to the Federal Constitution, [February 1788]
[page one] -
[page
two]
John Leland
Manuscript Division,
Library of Congress (148) |
Madison's Notes for the Bill of Rights
Madison used this outline to guide him in delivering his speech
introducing the Bill of Rights into the First Congress on June 8,
1789. Madison proposed an amendment to assuage the anxieties of
those who feared that religious freedom would be endangered by the
unamended Constitution. According to The Congressional Register
Madison, on June 8, moved that "the civil rights of none shall be
abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any
national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal
rights of conscience be in any manner, or on any pretext infringed."
Notes
for a speech introducing the Bill of Rights, [June 8, 1789] [page
one] -
[page
two]
James Madison, Holograph notes
Manuscript Division,
Library of Congress (149)
The Bill of Rights
The necessary two thirds majority in each house of Congress ratified
the Bill of Rights on September 28, 1789. As sent to the states for
approval, the Bill of Rights contained twelve proposed amendments to
the Constitution. Amendments One and Two did not receive the
required approval of three fourths of the states. As a result,
Article Three in the original Bill of Rights became the First
Amendment to the Constitution. This copy on vellum was signed by
Speaker of the House Frederick Muhlenberg, Vice President John
Adams, and Secretary of State Samuel Otis.
The Bill
of Rights (the John Beckley copy) September 28, 1789.
Holograph manuscript on vellum
Manuscript Division,
Library of Congress (150)
|
THE RHETORICAL SUPPORT OF RELIGION:
WASHINGTON AND ADAMS
George Washington, Episcopal Vestryman
Washington was for many years a vestryman at Truro Parish, his local
Episcopal Church. The entry of June 5, 1772, shows Washington and
his neighbor, George Mason, the author of the Virginia Declaration
of Rights, engaged in parish business, including making arrangements
for replacing the front steps of the church, painting its roof and
selling church pews to the members as a means of obtaining revenue.
The minutes of the meeting also reveal that Washington and George
William Fairfax presented the parish with gold leaf to be used to
gild letters on "Carved Ornaments" on the altar.
The
Vestry Book of Truro Parish, Virginia, 1732-1802
Manuscript volume
Manuscript Division,
Library of Congress (152) |
The country's first two presidents,
George Washington and John Adams, were firm believers in the
importance of religion for republican government. As citizens of
Virginia and Massachusetts, both were sympathetic to general
religious taxes being paid by the citizens of their respective
states to the churches of their choice. However both statesmen would
have discouraged such a measure at the national level because of its
divisiveness. They confined themselves to promoting religion
rhetorically, offering frequent testimonials to its importance in
building the moral character of American citizens, that, they
believed, undergirded public order and successful popular
government. |
George
Washington
Chalk drawing on paper, ca. 1800, by St. Memin
Prints and Photograph
Division, Library of Congress. (151)
Washington's Prayer
The draft of the circular letter is in the hand of a secretary,
although the signature is Washington's. Some have called this
concluding paragraph "Washington's Prayer." In it, he asked God to:
"dispose us all, to do Justice, to love mercy, and to demean
ourselves with that Charity, humility and pacific temper of mind,
which were the Characteristicks of the Divine Author of our blessed
Religion, and without an humble imitation of whose example in these
things, we can never hope to be a happy Nation."
Circular
to the chief executives of the states, June 11, 1783
George Washington, Manuscript
Manuscript Division,
Library of Congress (153)
"To Bigotry no Sanction"
President George Washington and a group of public officials,
including Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson, left New York City,
the temporary capital of the United States, on August 15, 1790, for
a brief tour of Rhode Island. At Newport, Washington received an
address of congratulations from the congregation of the Touro
Synagogue. His famous answer, assuring his fellow citizens "of the
Stock of Abraham" that the new American republic would give "to
bigotry no sanction, to persecution not assistance," is seen here in
the copy from Washington's letterbook.
George
Washington to the Hebrew Congregation in New Port, Rhode Island
[page one] -
[page
two]
Manuscript copy, Letterbook 1790-1794
Manuscript Division.
Library of Congress (154)
|
WASHINGTON'S FAREWELL ADDRESS
| George Washington's Farewell Address is
one of the most important documents in American history.
Recommendations made in it by the first president, particularly in
the field of foreign affairs, have exerted a strong and continuing
influence on American statesmen and politicians. The address, in
which Washington informed the American people that he would not seek
a third term and offered advice on the country's future policies,
was published on September 19, 1796, in David Claypoole's
American Daily Advertiser. It was immediately reprinted in
newspapers and as a pamphlet throughout the United States. The
address was drafted in July 1796 by Alexander Hamilton and revised
for publication by the president himself. Washington also had at his
disposal an earlier draft by James Madison.
The "religion section" of the address was for many years as
familiar to Americans as was Washington's warning that the United
States should avoid entangling alliances with foreign nations.
Washington's observations on the relation of religion to government
were commonplace, and similar statements abound in documents from
the founding period. Washington's prestige, however, gave his views
a special authority with his fellow citizens and caused them to be
repeated in political discourse well into the nineteenth century.
|
Hamilton's Draft of Washington's Farewell Address
George Washington's Farewell Address was drafted by Alexander
Hamilton who made a stronger case for the necessity of religious
faith as a prop for popular government than Washington was willing
to accept. Washington incorporated Hamilton's assertion that it was
unreasonable to suppose that "national morality can be maintained in
exclusion of religious principle," but declined to add Hamilton's
next sentence, written in the left margin of this page: "does it
[national morality] not require the aid of a generally received and
divinely authoritative Religion?"
Draft of
Washington's Farewell Address, [July] 1796
Alexander Hamilton
Manuscript Division,
Library of Congress (155)
The Farewell Address
In his Farewell Address, the first president advised his fellow
citizens that "Religion and morality" were the "great Pillars of
human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of Men and
citizens." "National morality," he added, could not exist "in
exclusion of religious principle." "Virtue or morality," he
concluded, as the products of religion, were "a necessary spring of
popular government." The "religion section" is located in the lower
right portion of page one and continues to the upper right portion
of page two.
The
Farewell Address [page one] -
[page
two] -
[page
three]
George Washington, Broadside
Rare Book and Special
Collections Division,
Library of Congress (156) |
Adams on Religion
John Adams, a self-confessed "church going animal," grew up in the
Congregational Church in Braintree, Massachusetts. By the time he
wrote this letter his theological position can best be described as
Unitarian. In this letter Adams tells Jefferson that "Without
Religion this World would be Something not fit to be mentioned in
polite Company, I mean Hell."
John
Adams to Thomas Jefferson, April 19, 1817
[page one] -
[page
two] -
[page
three] -
[page
four]
Holograph letter
Manuscript Division,
Library of Congress (157)
Adams's Fast Day Proclamation
John Adams continued the practice, begun in 1775 and adopted under
the new federal government by Washington, of issuing fast and
thanksgiving day proclamations. In this proclamation, issued at a
time when the nation appeared to be on the brink of a war with
France, Adams urged the citizens to "acknowledge before God the
manifold sins and transgressions with which we are justly chargeable
as individuals and as a nation; beseeching him at the same time, of
His infinite grace, through the Redeemer of the World, freely to
remit all our offences, and to incline us, by His Holy Spirit, to
that sincere repentance and reformation which may afford us reason
to hope for his inestimable favor and heavenly benediction."
Fast Day
Proclamation, March 23, 1798.
John Adams. Broadside
Rare Book and Special
Collections Division, Library of Congress (158)
|
THE STATE BECOMES THE CHURCH:
JEFFERSON AND MADISON
| It is no exaggeration to say that on Sundays in Washington
during the administrations of Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809) and of
James Madison (1809-1817) the state became the church. Within a year
of his inauguration, Jefferson began attending church services in
the House of Representatives. Madison followed Jefferson's example,
although unlike Jefferson, who rode on horseback to church in the
Capitol, Madison came in a coach and four. Worship services in the
House--a practice that continued until after the Civil War--were
acceptable to Jefferson because they were nondiscriminatory and
voluntary. Preachers of every Protestant denomination appeared.
(Catholic priests began officiating in 1826.) As early as January
1806 a female evangelist, Dorothy Ripley, delivered a camp
meeting-style exhortation in the House to Jefferson, Vice President
Aaron Burr, and a "crowded audience." Throughout his administration
Jefferson permitted church services in executive branch buildings.
The Gospel was also preached in the Supreme Court chambers.
Jefferson's actions may seem surprising because his attitude
toward the relation between religion and government is usually
thought to have been embodied in his recommendation that there exist
"a wall of separation between church and state." In that statement,
Jefferson was apparently declaring his opposition, as Madison had
done in introducing the Bill of Rights, to a "national" religion. In
attending church services on public property, Jefferson and Madison
consciously and deliberately were offering symbolic support to
religion as a prop for republican government.
|
"A WALL OF SEPARATION"
Jefferson Attacked as an Infidel
During the presidential campaign of 1800, the Federalists attacked
Thomas Jefferson as an infidel, claiming that Jefferson's
intoxication with the religious and political extremism of the
French Revolution disqualified him from public office. In this
cartoon, the eye of God has instigated the American eagle to snatch
from Jefferson's hand the "Constitution & Independence" of the
United States before he can cast it on an "Altar to Gallic
Despotism," whose flames are being fed by the writings of Thomas
Paine, Helvetius, Rousseau, and other freethinkers. The paper, "To
Mazzei," dropping from Jefferson's right hand, was a 1796 letter
that was interpreted by Jefferson's enemies as an indictment of the
character of George Washington.
The
Providential Detection.
Etching by an unknown artist, c. 1800
The Library Company of Philadelphia (159)
Jefferson's Opinion of Jesus
In the 1790s, Thomas Jefferson, influenced by the writings of Joseph
Priestly, seems to have adopted a more positive opinion of
Christianity. In this letter to his friend Benjamin Rush, Jefferson
asserted that he was a "Christian, in the only sense in which
[Jesus] wished any one to be." In an attached syllabus, Jefferson
compared the "merit of the doctrines of Jesus" with those of the
classical philosophers and the Jews. Jefferson pronounced Jesus'
doctrines, though "disfigured by the corruptions of schismatising
followers" far superior to any competing system. Jefferson declined
to consider the "question of [Jesus] being a member of the god-head,
or in direct communication with it, claimed for him by some of his
followers, and denied by others."
Thomas
Jefferson to Benjamin Rush, April 21, 1803
[page one] -
[page
two] -
[page
three]
Holograph letter and syllabus. (Copyprint of verso.)
Manuscript Division,
Library of Congress (160)
|
Thomas Jefferson's reply of January 1,
1802, to an address of congratulations from the Danbury
(Connecticut) Baptist Association contains a phrase familiar in
today's political and judicial circles: "a wall of separation
between church and state." Many in the United States, including the
courts, have used this phrase to interpret the Founders' intentions
regarding the relationship between government and religion, as set
down by the First Amendment to the Constitution: "Congress shall
make no law respecting an establishment of religion . . . ."
However, the meaning of this clause has been the subject of
passionate dispute for the past fifty years.
Presented here are both the handwritten, edited draft of the
letter and an adjusted facsimile showing the original unedited
draft. The draft of the letter reveals that, far from dashing it off
as a "short note of courtesy," as some have called it, Jefferson
labored over its composition. Jefferson consulted Postmaster General
Gideon Granger of Connecticut and Attorney General Levi Lincoln of
Massachusetts while drafting the letter. That Jefferson consulted
two New England politicians about his messages indicated that he
regarded his reply to the Danbury Baptists as a political letter,
not as a dispassionate theoretical pronouncement on the relations
between government and religion.
|
The Lord's Prayer in Jefferson's Hand
Jefferson liked to experiment with and use cryptology. There are
several different codes in his papers at the Library of Congress,
including this one based on the Lord's Prayer, which Jefferson
carefully wrote out as a block of consecutive letters.
The Lord's
Prayer
Thomas Jefferson, Holograph manuscript
Manuscript Division,
Library of Congress (161)
The Jefferson Bible
It is thought that Jefferson prepared what is referred to as the
"Jefferson Bible" in 1820. In this volume, Jefferson used excerpts
from New Testaments in four languages to create parallel columns of
text recounting the life of Jesus, preserving what he considered to
be Christ's authentic actions and statements, eliminating the
mysterious and miraculous. He began his account with Luke's second
chapter, deleting the first in which the angel Gabriel announced to
the Virgin Mary that she would give birth to the Messiah by the Holy
Spirit. On the pages seen here, Jefferson deleted the part of the
birth story in which the angel of the Lord appeared to the
shepherds. The text ends with the crucifixion and burial and omits
any resurrection appearance.
The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth extracted
textually from
the Gospels in Greek, Latin, French & English
[index
page one] --
[index
page two] --
[index
page three]
Thomas Jefferson, c. 1820
National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution (162a)
The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth extracted
textually from
the Gospels in Greek, Latin, French & English.
[title
page] -
[page
one] -
[page
two]
Thomas Jefferson.
Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1904
General Collections,
Library of Congress (162c)
A Wall of Separation
The celebrated phrase, "a wall of separation between church and
state," was contained in Thomas Jefferson's letter to the Danbury
Baptists. American courts have used the phrase to interpret the
Founders' intentions regarding the relationship between government
and religion. The words, "wall of separation," appear just above the
section of the letter that Jefferson circled for deletion. In the
deleted section Jefferson explained why he refused to proclaim
national days of fasting and thanksgiving, as his predecessors,
George Washington and John Adams, had done. In the left margin, next
to the deleted section, Jefferson noted that he excised the section
to avoid offending "our republican friends in the eastern states"
who cherished days of fasting and thanksgiving.
Thomas
Jefferson to Nehemiah Dodge, Ephraim Robbins and Stephen S. Nelson,
a committee of the Danbury Baptist Association in the state of
Connecticut, January 1, 1802.
Holograph draft letter, 1802
Jefferson Papers, Manuscript
Division, Library of Congress (163a)
The Danbury Baptist Letter, as Originally Drafted
The Library of Congress is grateful to the Federal Bureau of
Investigation Laboratory for recovering the lines obliterated from
the Danbury Baptist letter by Thomas Jefferson. He originally wrote
"a wall of eternal separation between church and state," later
deleting the word "eternal." He also deleted the phrase "the duties
of my station, which are merely temporal." Jefferson must have been
unhappy with the uncompromising tone of both of these phrases,
especially in view of the implications of his decision, two days
later, to begin attending church services in the House of
Representatives.
Thomas
Jefferson to Nehemiah Dodge, Ephraim Robbins and Stephen S. Nelson,
a committee of the Danbury Baptist Association in the state of
Connecticut, January 1, 1802.
Letter, digitally revised to expose obliterated sections. Copyprint
Manuscript Division,
Library of Congress (163b)
Jefferson at Church in the Capitol
In his diary, Manasseh Cutler (1742-1823), a Federalist Congressman
from Massachusetts and Congregational minister, notes that on
Sunday, January 3, 1802, John Leland preached a sermon on the text
"Behold a greater than Solomon is here. Jef[ferso]n was present."
Thomas Jefferson attended this church service in Congress, just two
days after issuing the Danbury Baptist letter. Leland, a celebrated
Baptist minister, had moved from Orange County, Virginia, and was
serving a congregation in Cheshire, Massachusetts, from which he had
delivered to Jefferson a gift of a "mammoth cheese," weighing 1235
pounds.
Journal
entry, January 3, 1802
Manasseh Cutler
Charles Deering McCormick Library of Special Collections,
Northwestern University Library (164)
Jefferson and Family at Church
Manasseh Cutler to Joseph Torrey, January 3, 1803. [page one] --
[page
two] --
[page
three] --
[page
four]
In this letter Manasseh Cutler informs Joseph Torrey that Thomas
Jefferson "and his family
have constantly attended public worship in the Hall" of the House of
Representatives.
Manuscript letter
Charles Deering McCormick Library of Special Collections,
Northwestern University Library (165)
Reserved Seats at Capitol Services
Here is a description, by an early Washington "insider," Margaret
Bayard Smith (1778-1844), a writer and social critic and wife of
Samuel Harrison Smith, publisher of the National Intelligencer,
of Jefferson's attendance at church services in the House of
Representatives: "Jefferson during his whole administration was a
most regular attendant. The seat he chose the first day sabbath, and
the adjoining one, which his private secretary occupied, were ever
afterwards by the courtesy of the congregation, left for him."
Reminiscences. [left page] -
[right
page]
Margaret Bayard Smith, 1837. Manuscript volume. (Copyprint of verso)
Manuscript Division,
Library of Congress (166-166a)
Incident at Congressional Church Services
In this letter Catherine Mitchill, wife of New York senator Samuel
Latham Mitchill, describes stepping on Jefferson's toes at the
conclusion of a church service in the House of Representatives. She
was "so prodigiously frighten'd," she told her sister, "that I could
not stop to make an apology, but got out of the way as quick as I
could."
Catherine
Akerly Mitchill to her sister, Margaret Miller, April 8, 1806.
Manuscript letter
Manuscript Division,
Library of Congress (167)
Madison Seen at House Church Service
Abijah Bigelow, a Federalist congressman from Massachusetts,
describes President James Madison at a church service in the House
on December 27, 1812, as well as an incident that had occurred when
Jefferson was in attendance some years earlier.
Abijah
Bigelow to Hannah Bigelow, December 28, 1812. [left page] -
[right
page]
Manuscript letter
The American Antiquarian Society, Worcester, Massachusetts (168)
Hymns Played at Congressional Church Service
According to Margaret Bayard Smith, a regular at church services in
the Capitol, the Marine Band "made quite a dazzling appearance in
the gallery . . . but in their attempts to accompany the
psalm-singing of the congregation, they completely failed and after
a while, the practice was discontinued."
"The
President's Own" United States Marine Corp Band, ca. 1798.
Watercolor, Lt. Col. Donna Neary, USMCR, late twentieth century.
Copyprint.
United States Marine Corp Band, Washington, D.C. (169)
The Old House of Representatives
Church services were held in what is now called Statuary Hall from
1807 to 1857. The first services in the Capitol, held when the
government moved to Washington in the fall of 1800, were conducted
in the "hall" of the House in the north wing of the building. In
1801 the House moved to temporary quarters in the south wing, called
the "Oven," which it vacated in 1804, returning to the north wing
for three years. Services were conducted in the House until after
the Civil War. The Speaker's podium was used as the preacher's
pulpit.
The Old
House of Representatives
Oil on canvas by Samuel F.B. Morse, 1822. Copyprint.
In the collection of the Corcoran Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.
Museum Purchase, Gallery Fund (170)
A Millennialist Sermon Preached in Congress
This sermon on the millennium was preached by the Baltimore
Swedenborgian minister, John Hargrove (1750-1839) in the House of
Representatives. One of the earliest millennialist sermons preached
before Congress was offered on July 4, 1801, by the Reverend David
Austin (1759-1831), who at the time considered himself "struck in
prophesy under the style of the Joshua of the American Temple."
Having proclaimed to his Congressional audience the imminence of the
Second Coming of Christ, Austin took up a collection on the floor of
the House to support services at "Lady Washington's Chapel" in a
nearby hotel where he was teaching that "the seed of the Millennial
estate is found in the backbone of the American Revolution."
A Sermon
on the Second Coming of Christ, and on the Last Judgment.
Delivered the 25th December, 1804 before both houses of Congress, at
the Capitol in the city of Washington. John Hargrove. Baltimore:
Warner & Hanna, 1805
Rare Book and Special
Collections Division, Library of Congress (171)
First Catholic Sermon in the House
On January 8, 1826, Bishop John England (1786-1842) of Charleston,
South Carolina, became the first Catholic clergyman to preach in the
House of Representatives. The overflow audience included President
John Quincy Adams, whose July 4, 1821, speech England rebutted in
his sermon. Adams had claimed that the Roman Catholic Church was
intolerant of other religions and therefore incompatible with
republican institutions. England asserted that "we do not believe
that God gave to the church any power to interfere with our civil
rights, or our civil concerns." "I would not allow to the Pope, or
to any bishop of our church," added England, "the smallest
interference with the humblest vote at our most insignificant
balloting box."
John
England, Bishop of Charleston, South Carolina
Oil on canvas
Diocese of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina (173)
The
substance of a discourse preached in the hall of the House of
Representatives
of the United States, January 8, 1826.
John England. Baltimore: F. Lucas, 1826
Rare Book and Special
Collections Division, Library of Congress (172)
Communion Service in the Treasury Building
Manasseh Cutler here describes a four-hour communion service in the
Treasury Building, conducted by a Presbyterian minister, the
Reverend James Laurie: "Attended worship at the Treasury. Mr. Laurie
alone. Sacrament. Full assembly. Three tables; service very solemn;
nearly four hours."
Journal
entry, December 23, 1804
Manasseh Cutler. Manuscript
Charles Deering McCormick Library of Special Collections,
Northwestern University Library (175)
The Treasury Building
The first Treasury Building, where several denominations conducted
church services, was burned by the British in 1814. The new
building, seen here on the lower right, was built on approximately
the same location as the earlier one, within view of the White
House.
Washington
City, 1820.
Watercolor sketch by Baroness Hyde de Neuville, 1820
I. N. Phelps Stokes Collection, The Miriam and Ira D. Wallach
Division of Art,
Prints and Photographs, The New York Public Library, Astor, Lenox
and Tilden Foundations (176)
Adams's Description of a Church Service in the Supreme Court
John Quincy Adams here describes the Reverend James Laurie, pastor
of a Presbyterian Church that had settled into the Treasury
Building, preaching to an overflow audience in the Supreme Court
Chamber, which in 1806 was located on the ground floor of the
Capitol.
Diary
entry, February 2, 1806
John Quincy Adams. Copyprint
Adams Family Papers, Massachusetts Historical Society, Boston (177)
The Old Supreme Court Chamber
Description of church services in the Supreme Court chamber by
Manasseh Cutler (1804) and John Quincy Adams (1806) indicate that
services were held in the Court soon after the government moved to
Washington in 1800.
The Old
Supreme Court Chamber, ca. 1810, U. S. Capitol Building
Photograph by Franz Jantzen. Copyprint
Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States (178)
Church Services in Congress after the Civil War
Charles Boynton (1806-1883) was in 1867 chaplain of the House of
Representatives and organizing pastor of the First Congregational
Church in Washington, which was trying at that time to build its own
sanctuary. In the meantime the church, as Boynton informed potential
donors, was holding services "at the Hall of Representatives" where
"the audience is the largest in town. . . .nearly 2000 assembled
every Sabbath" for services, making the congregation in the House
the "largest Protestant Sabbath audience then in the United States."
The First Congregational Church met in the House from 1865 to 1868.
Fundraising brochure
Charles B. Boynton. Washington, D.C.: November 1, 1867
Rare Book and Special
Collections Division, Library of Congress (180)
House of Representatives, After the Civil War
The House moved to its current location on the south side of the
Capitol in 1857. It contained the "largest Protestant Sabbath
audience" in the United States when the First Congregational Church
of Washington held services there from 1865 to 1868.
The House
of Representatives, 1866
Chromo-lithograph by E. Sachse & Co, 1866
Prints and Photographs
Division, Library of Congress (179) |

|


























|