|
|
|
Can you believe jews are this
stupid?
Things Jews and Liberals Say
I thought that the people who browse my website might enjoy a sample of what the Jews like to say about it. The first Jew didn't sign his name, but that's not unusual. Neither are the obscenities and the threats, which Jews seem to use somewhat more freely than Whites do. These writers left their little surprises on my guestbook, and because of the length of my replies, I took them off the guestbook and put them here. Lies and deceptive half-truths can often be presented in a shorter space than their debunking can, because exposition requires a level of detail that is optional in sophistry. One exception: Somewhere down this page, a loyal White woman (featherbabe) wrote an answer to a Black woman, and because of its relevance and merit I included it here as well.
Comments: FUCK YOU, YOU NAZI ANTI-SEMITE BASTARD!!! This whole thing is nothing but jealousy! Because we're better than you? Because we "control all the world's money"? Because we "attempt to take over the world"? Ha! BULLSHIT! sieg heil??? sieg shit!!! Like we caught Eichmann, we will catch every each and one of you!!! Jesus Christ - a Jew Karl Marx - a Jew Adolph Hitler - Jewish routes (don't forger that) Eva Braun - a Jew Albert Einstein - a Jew Woodie Allen - a Jew Steven Spielberg - a Jew Jerry Seinfeld - a Jew and the list goes on. Do you use ICQ? I hope not! Mirabillis is an Israeli-Jewish company. Do you use the MMX technology? I hope not, because it was developed in Intel Haifa. Do you believe in the Theory of Relativity? I hope not, Albert Einstein was a Jew. Of course, you do not want to trust the Jewish efficiency. Tuesday October 27th 1998 01:49:07
I will let the preceding message stand for a while, despite its obscenity, because it illustrates the caustic nature of the Jewish influence on White culture better than anything I could ever write. In the first place, Jews are not "better," and only they and their liberal dupes think so. Jews did not produce the wealth that they have--they wouldn't have been able to. Israel gets bailed out of debt every year by countries that themselves have financial burdens created by Jews and Jewish policies. Secondly, the Jews are not riding nearly as high as they were when they caught former German military officers, tortured them into signing phony confessions, and then hung them. Their tide is still high, but it is now a receding tide, and they won't be able to fulfill the death-threat that the preceding writer made against me. Jesus Christ was a reformer of Judaism, and the Jews of his day considered him an apostate and a heretic. For a Jew to call Jesus a Jew is an admission that being a Jew is more of a racial, hereditary thing than a religious one -- which is essentially what Adolf Hitler was trying to tell us in Mein Kampf. This is true even though most of the Jews today are of Turkic-Khazar lineage than from Hebrew lineage: the Ashkenazim's first major heist was the theft of the cultural heritage of the ancient Israelites. From a Christian standpoint, Jesus is a divine Savior born through the power of God. The Jews had absolutely nothing to do with the First Coming of Christ, since without God's direct intervention the baby Jesus would never have been born. Mary might have had children without the Immaculate Conception, but none of them would have been Christ. Every claim by the Jews that they "gave" to Christians their Savior is a lie that probably constitutes sacrilege from a Christian point of view, because it is an attempt to give the Jews, most of whom are biologically poorly connected (if at all) with the Hebrews, credit for something that God did. I am not a Christian myself, but I am able to understand the arrogance of the Jewish aggrandizement on account of Jesus. Third, Karl Marx was related to prominent Jews and may have been Jewish himself. This isn't really something to brag about, since the doctrines of Karl Marx have probably led to more deaths (over 100 million victims worldwide) than all the religious wars in history, and the people killed as the result of Marxism were killed comparatively recently. Fourth, Adolf Hitler was not a Jew. The previous writer is pushing a lie popular with some Jews, which involves giving the Jewish people credit for Everything Important. Hitler MAY have had a Jewish grandfather -- but it was his father's father. Hitler's mother was not Jewish. Even if the speculation about this Jewish blood is correct, Hitler would still have been 3/4 White, and he would not have been a Jew by definition. You can see the level of audacity that Jews will use in the furtherance of their lies, and that's another thing that Hitler was trying to get across in Mein Kampf. You should read it: it can be downloaded from my website. Albert Einstein was a Jew, and he was a good Jew. Einstein deserves his reputation for brilliance. And by all the accounts I've heard, he was a good and decent man. However, Einstein's smartness is not why he became a household word. There are and were men even smarter than Einstein was, whose work in physics was at least as difficult and important as Einstein's work was, whom you've never heard about, unless you are a physicist or a mathematician. One of those men is Karl Friedrich Gauss. Gauss was a White man of German stock. If he had been Jewish, you'd be hearing more about his contributions to celestial mechanics and to numerical analysis. But he was not Jewish, so the Jews in charge of the media and publishing companies do not find it necessary to advertise him or his accomplishments. Instead, the rave is all about Einstein, who did some important work on the theory of relativity. The Jews would have you to believe that Einstein worked it all out himself, but he didn't. He built upon earlier contributions by George Francis Fitzgerald (Irish), Hendrik Antoon Lorentz (Dutch), and others. You don't hear about them because they were not Jewish. Their work was important, but that is not what qualifies a scientist to become a well-known celebrity. The Jewish media, and any education system strongly influenced by Jews, play games with emphasis in order to make you forget that their contributions were fewer than those of gentiles, and not greater as they want you to think. I never much cared for Woody Allen. Or for Allen Guinsberg, either. Jerry Seinfeld is funny, but so are many of the gentile comedians that you never hear about because gentiles are not Jews. And, yes, the list does go on and on. Leon Trotsky was a Jew. Yakov Sverdlov was a Jew. Yakov Yurovsky was a Jew. Karl Radek was a Jew. The murderers of the Soviet NKVD were Jews. International organized crime is mostly Jewish, at least at the top levels. Bill Clinton's foreign policies are written by Jews and rubberstamped by the Presidential pen. The people who control public opinion by filtering the information that gets to the public via the media are Jews. Although a few Jews have been outstanding contributors to science or to philosophy, the aggregate effect of the Jews, at least of the Ashkenazi Jews, has been murderous, treacherous, and duplicitous for centuries. Read Hitler's book. He wasn't lying when he related the things he saw himself in Vienna. Read Martin Luther's essay "On the Jews and their Lies," which also may be downloaded from my website. Martin Luther wasn't lying, either. Read Henry Ford's book, "The International Jew," which also may be downloaded from my website. Ford, too, was telling the truth in that book. George Washington said that the Jews "worked against us more effectively than the enemies' armies." Fyodor Dostoyevsky wrote about the Jews' predatory ways in his series "Diary of a Writer." The Jews pulled off the remarkable trick of conquering both Russia and America by coup in one case and by stealthy subversion in the other, and getting the conquered White people in those two countries to wage war on Germany which, at the time, was being led by a man who wasn't deceived by the Jewish press. But White people are waking up to Jewish tricks, and the Jews don't like this emerging awareness. They fight it with ridicule, with deception, with self-serving laws that oppress people (anti-Holohoax denial laws being among these) and sometimes with violence. I don't know about ICQ's development in particular, but I do know about the Jewish habit of taking undue or excessive credit for achievements that were primarily non-Jewish in origin. When American technology and money were used to build a new jet fighter called the Lavi for Israel's air force, the Jews started stamping "made in Israel" all over aircraft parts that, in fact, had been made in the United States. Even if the parts had been made in Israel, though, the stamping would not have been without some element of deceptive intention, namely the transfer of the appearance of technological prowess from the American aerospace industry, which deserved it, to Israel, which did not. The same might be said for MMX technology, except from a slightly different angle. Israel receives huge financial gifts from many countries, especially from the United States and from Germany. Israel is a country that has had its technological infrastructure built for it, and paid for by foreigners, most of whom were not even Jews. Free from the burden of paying their own overhead, you'd think that miracle after miracle would come out of Israel, but instead the only output of significance is an occasional software twiddle, one that most people could easily do without, which anyway came from an international company not started in Israel or by a Jew, a twiddle that was probably created as much by Whites as by Jews, and this Jewish bozo thinks that it signifies something that would justify the harm that Israel inflicts upon the world. That harm includes Israel's military aggression and Israel's providing a safe-haven for Jewish criminals, to which they can flee when their villainies in other countries are detected. Does MMX make up for the Jewish transfer of atomic bomb technology from the US to the USSR in the 1950's? No, it does not. Does it make up for the money swindled from White people on the basis of a bogus Holocaust history? No it does not. MMX doesn't make amends for the White slave trade, in which Jews trick young women in Ukraine into leaving their impoverished homeland for "secretarial work" in Turkey or in Israel, and then forced to become prostitutes when they arrive. Wednesday October 28th 1998 07:21:08
Comments: Rarely have I come across such ill-conceived and unproven pseudo-research. You offer nothing but your own opinion and that of others like you to back up anything you say. Your history is warped, if you believe all the misinformation you provide here about Jews. Pogroms were done *to* Jews in Russia, not by them. You are a dinosaur, philosophically, and you stand in the way of progress and freedom. The one thing that gives me hope is that you will eventually grow old and pass away. It is to be hoped that your ideas will as well. You are a frightened little man, else you would not take such delight in insuring that there are still some in the world that you can look down at and thus feel a bit better and not so unsure of who you are and where you came from. I pity you. And, BTW, I am not Jewish but probably more German than you are. Sunday October 25th 1998 08:53:34
Comments: Annie, your criticism sounds like what usually comes out of the mouths of ADL nit-wits: huge envelope, tiny letter (heavy on noise, light on substance). WHICH "pseudo- research" of mine do you mean? You didn't say. WHAT did I present as fact without proof of it? Again, you didn't say. You were nebulous. Your statements were more like caricature than like argument. You made no specific charge that can be debated, with one exception: You said that the Jews DID NOT commit pogroms in "Russia" (which at that time was part of the Soviet Union and not an independent country). The one hard statement you made was false. First, the Jews instigated the Bolshevik Revolution. Second, other Jews financed the Bolshevik Revolution. Third, the great preponderance (over 80%) of the early Communist government of the Soviet Union were Jews. The same is true of the lesser soviet councils that governed the several republics under the authority of the Supreme Soviet. Fourth, the massacres of the Russian and Ukrainian peoples prior to Stalin, and to some extent while Stalin ruled the U.S.S.R., were committed by Jews -- including the murder of Tsar Nicholas and his family. Jews are directly and indirectly responsible for at least 20,000,000 White deaths. At the very least. Stalin got power by beating the Jews at a game that they themselves began. He out-maneuvered Trotsky and took charge. Stalin was not a Jew, and he was the only Soviet leader who was not a Jew-chauvinist or a Jew-toady. Stalin was ethnically Georgian, and he was "against" anybody who got in his way, nevermind whether they were Jew or Gentile. That's what most of the howl about Soviet "pogroms" is about. Stalin treated Jews and Gentiles with equal ruthlessness, and the Jews weren't the favored darlings that they had been earlier. They weren't especially singled out for brutality, though the Jews like to paint the picture that way. When you accuse me of not proving my statements, you ought to say what sort of proof would satisfy you. What do you want? Is the level of documentation on my page of racial violence statistics adequate? If I were to tell you that some of the information I got about the Jews' power in the Soviet Union came from Jews, would that be satisfactory as proof? http://www.khazaria.com/ If I told you that some of my other information came to me from Russian and Ukrainian pen-pals that I've known for years, would that suffice? Probably not. You, not I, are the one with the warped picture of history, and your confidence comes from hearing the media telling the same lie that you tell, perhaps innocently, perhaps not. Whenever you are ready to present specifics instead of blowing a smokescreen, feel free to send me one e-mail. Monday October 26th 1998 06:05:00
Name: Irishboy18lucky Name: MrBreeze1
Comments: Hm. I received a surge in my guestbook signers yesterday. That's good. Except some of the Jews uploaded their posts more than once, and when that happens I usually delete every post except the last one. Someone made a good point when he said that I make use of even the nasty things that the "enemy" says - that's true. The ugly remarks of Jews contrast nicely with the polite comments of the gentiles. It shows (in yet another small way) that there really is a difference that all non-Jewish peoples need to be aware of. And I like to answer people who write to my guestbook, if I have the time. Christian Machemehl, writing from Germany, asserts that Whites and Blacks are equal. This is obviously false, and it is obvious that he has absorbed multiculturalism propaganda without careful consideration. Negroes have, as compared with Whites, wider noses, darker skins, thicker skulls, smaller brains, lower intelligence, larger teeth, longer jaw bones, longer arms in relation to their body height, different depositions of body fat, different resistances to disease, and different nutritional requirements. Before 1940, all of this information was readily available from general reference encyclopedias, such as the Encyclopedia Britannica, which simply deleted this racial information when the big push toward a multicultural society was getting underway. Those old references were correct - they didn't say anything false about racial differences - but the information was removed for political reasons, and today you have to research specialized medical journals to uncover the same facts. Some of those racial differences are trivial, but others are very important. For example, the lower intelligence of Blacks (in general) makes them unsuited for many of the professional and technical jobs required to maintain an advanced civilization. Misguided efforts to incorporate them into those positions anyway will only result in a weakening of the industries and a loss of competitiveness. We will all have to pay, in the long run, for trying to act as though the races are equal, when they are really not equal. Mr. Machemehl also said that the Jews are the same as everybody else, and that the Nazis were crazy to think otherwise. He is wrong. The Jews are most definitely not the same as everybody else, and it's not just the Nazis who realized it. Jews have been banished from, or driven out of, Spain in the year 613 and again in 1492; from parts of Germany in 1096, again in 1146, and again in 1940 (by the Nazis); from Flanders (today Belgium) in 1121; from France in 1181, again in 1306, and AGAIN in 1394; from parts of Italy (including Naples, Genoa and Venice) in 1540 and 1550. After Ukraine was occupied by a Polish army in the 16th century, the Jews volunteered to be the Pole's tax-collectors. They went around spying on the Ukrainian peasants to discover any minor violation of the tax laws that they could use for extortion purposes. The poor peasants knew that they might be beaten to death (a usual punishment for tax evasion then) if they refused to pay the Jews whatever they demanded. Even births to Ukrainian mothers were taxed, and so the Jews alone were permitted to carry the keys to the Christian Orthodox churches, where by religious custom the baptisms of the babies had to be performed, so that the Christians could not baptise them secretly without paying the tax. In 1648, a Cossack named Bohdan Khmelnitsky raised an army of Ukrainians and beat the Polish knights out of Ukraine. Suddenly, the Jews were deprived of their protectors, and the Ukrainian peasants got their vengance upon them. It is this kind of thing that the Jews refer to as "persecution," conveniently leaving unspoken that it was the Jews' own behavior that caused them their troubles. In general, anti-Semitism does not give any moral argument to the Jews against the Gentiles; rather, the very fact that Jews seem always to provoke hostility from Gentiles, no matter which, no matter where, no matter when, gives a moral argument to the Gentiles against the Jews. In this, the White, the Black, the Arab, and ethnic Russians and Germans alike can agree. Someone who did not have the guts to sign his name said that my website was so "stupid" it was entertaining. What he thought was stupid was the idea that the Jews would make up the Holohoax in order to manipulate White people with guilt and thereby to advance Jewish power in the world. Well, what is so stupid about it? It's working, isn't it? And there were no 'Nazi homicidal gas chambers' - that's just plain fact. You can't use a homicidal gas chamber made of iron-bearing bricks to kill hundreds of thousands of people with hydrogen cyanide gas without getting some of that Prussian blue chemical on the bricks. That's a scientific fact. And the lack of Prussian blue on those bricks proves - no matter WHAT the Jews say about it - that those buildings were never used as homicidal gas chambers. Jewish rants and rages might cause a lot of gutless Whites to knuckle under and agree with them to avoid strife and trouble, but Jewish rants and rages will never, never, never change the laws of nature, and that is what is contradicting the testimony of all those lying Jews. Another Jew wrote to say that members of his family died in a Nazi Holocaust. It would probably be more accurate to say that they died (somewhere or other) during World War 2. Perhaps his dead relatives even died in Europe. Maybe they were even killed as the result of the war. But one thing is absolutely certain: his relatives did not die in any 'Nazi homicidal gas chambers' because there weren't any of those. He also implied that the Jews mean no harm to Whites. He might not intend any harm, personally, but his people certainly have been harming my people in the course of the centuries. That is why Whites kept driving Jews out of their countries. If the Jews had not been causing harm, those expulsions would not have been required and so they would never have happened. When an historically isolated conflict involves only two tribes, you have to examine the struggle between them in some detail before you can decide which of them was the 'cause' of the trouble. But when there are many historically related conflicts, and one tribe keeps showing up as a principal, you can safely guess that the blame should be assigned to that one tribe, and not to all the rest of the world. The very idea that the Jews would have given up the manipulative, extortionist ways that they have practiced for the past 1500 years is just too, too funny. The Holohoax is a myth. There were no 'Nazi homicidal gas chambers.' There were no 'Six Million.' MrBreeze wrote to say that all the races are equal because they all bleed red when you cut them. Well, if you cut a chimpanzee, it will also bleed red. So by your criterion, a chimpanzee is equal with you, MrBreeze. Would you be willing to marry one? Now, the difference between Blacks and Whites is not as great as the difference between Whites and chimps, but nonetheless there are still differences. And those differences are important because they affect the way multicultural societies actually do work, as contrasted with how you liberals think they should work. Every means we have for examining the fitness of Blacks to mingle with Whites in the socially and technologically advanced societies that Whites usually build tell us that Blacks are not suited. Blacks would be better off in their own country, by themselves, so that they could live up to their own potential away from the kind of social organization for which Whites are just naturally able to out-compete them. I don't think that the average White would be able to keep up with Blacks in the kind of society that Blacks built, since that society would be optimized for Black talents and not for White ones. Liberals, more dishonest than stupid, would be quick to recognize that - and just as quick to deny that the reverse is also true. And, MrBreeze, one is not "inbreeding" (in the destructive sense of the word) by choosing a mate of one's own race. Your race is not the same thing as your immediate family and close relatives. It was dishonest for you to suggest otherwise. And it was also dishonest for you to imply that White skulls are "thick," since, of course, Black skulls are considerably thicker than White ones. To those who sent compliments, thank you. Saturday April 24th 1999 11:43:20
A smart Black woman misspelled probably as "probally," used "they" where their is proper, used the singular "black" where the proper plural noun Blacks was required, misspelled minorities as "minoritys," abused a colloquial contraction y'all (you all) by misplacing the apostrophe in one instance (ya'll) and by omitting it in another (yall), misspelled their as "ther", misspelled sooner as "sonner," and misspelled survived as "survied." A smart Black woman was gratuitously obscene four times, though possibly without realizing it. A smart Black woman in several instances comma-spliced sentences that should have been separated by a period or by a semicolon, and in still more instances she omitted required punctuation, as in "So think about it sonner or later...." A smart Black woman improperly capitalized a conjunction ("Or") when it was not at the beginning of a sentence or a title, and she omitted required coordinating conjunctions in several instances. She also referred to the prison cells holding criminals scheduled for execution as "death role," when the correct phrase is "death row." But you expect mistakes like that from Blacks, even from ones who consider themselves to be "smart" Blacks, and it really isn't important to try to make "A smart Black woman" improve her spelling, grammar, and diction. But it is important to help her, and everyone else, to understand the factual errors she made and to become aware of the reason she made them. Blacks are only one-seventh of the population of the United States, and yet they commit more than half of the violent crimes. That is already a reason for Whites to take measures to protect themselves. No other information is required, though more is certainly available. As featherbabe pointed out, Blacks are a majority of the inmates in certain prisons, and throughout the United States Blacks are incarcerated in numbers about equal to the numbers of White prison inmates -- but that's despite their being only one-seventh of the population! "A smart Black woman" has absorbed uncritically the picture of racial violence presented by the Jew-controlled media. Those media portray racial violence as a thing that Whites mostly do and that Blacks mostly suffer from. That picture, however, is the complete opposite of the truth. The per-capita rate of Black violence against Whites is about sixteen times higher than the per-capita rate of White violence against Blacks. In other words, the "average" Black is sixteen times more likely to hurt a White person than the other way around. The difference between the races, in terms of behavior, is very large. The media are controlled by persons with a strong interest in finding White people to blame for "hate crimes," and, since they are looking for them vigilantly, they find one now and then. At such times, there is a great media sensation about the terrible White criminal, and this circus goes on, and on, and on for months. In this respect, OJ Simpson was anomalous: a Black man treated by the media as a White man would have been treated. If OJ had not been famous, or if one of the murdered persons had not been a Jew, the trial would probably not have acquired so much publicity. But, as I said, the OJ Simpson trial was anomalous. Nearly every time the media makes thunder and lightning over a "hate crime," the accused criminal is White. Yet if you made the effort to examine the FBI crime statistics, as I have done, you'd learn that most of the crimes between Blacks and Whites involve Black perpetrators and White victims. It isn't the other way around. Once you adjust for the size of the population from which the perpetrators come, you find that Blacks kill members of every race, including their own race, at higher rates than any other race (i.e., any non-Black race) kills members of any race. The Jews and liberals who control the media have deceived very many people about what the nature of the crime problem in America really is. These same people also promote lies that our children are learning in schools, and most of these lies give Blacks credit for White achievements or leadership. I've seen movie advertizements depicting Hannibal as a Black man, when in fact he was White. The same can be said of the ancient Egyptian Queens Nefertiti and Cleopatra. The invention of paper is attributed to the Black agricultural technician George Washington Carver, when in fact the (White) ancient Egyptians invented paper in about 3500 BC, and the manufacturing process was improved 3700 years later by the Chinese. All Carver did was find a way to make an inferior paper-like substance from peanut shells. These education-corrupters also give specific Blacks credit for the invention of combs and brushes, when in fact these items are prehistoric and have been invented again and again by nearly every human society on Earth. Such are the lies rampant in America's school's today in the name of multiculturalism. "A smart Black woman" invited us to come to Washington, DC, to see all the "positive things" about the Blacks in that district who have managed to graduate from high school. I hope that they can spell better than "A smart Black woman can," and I wonder whether she has a high school diploma despite her defective verbal skills. But, she cautioned, the DC streets are "rough", so we Whites must not say anything offensive to Blacks while we are there. Well now, that's just the point, isn't it? If Washington, DC, were a White city instead of a Black city, its streets would not be "rough." If DC were a White district instead of a Black district, its annual crime rate would be 10% to 20% of what it is now. In a White area, people don't go berserk with guns, knives and baseball bats over minor grievances, especially when those grievances are expressions of a difference of opinion. "A smart Black woman" has out-smarted herself by indicating the tendency of Blacks to settle everything violently. So, for a good while yet, it appears that I, being a racially conscious White man, must stay out of the place that calls itself the capital city of my country.
I don't really know whether Abraham was compassionate or not. Perhaps he was, but it hardly matters. The Jews of today are not a conspicuously compassionate people - quite the reverse, in fact. And they aren't related to Abraham, either. Most of the Jews in the world today are Ashkenazi Jews, who are the result of a hybridization between White European peoples and a Medieval Turkic group known as the Khazars. Between the 5th and 10th centuries, the Khazars had a kingdom where Ukraine is today. In the 8th century, their King Bulan converted to Judaism and caused the conversion of the country, much as Constantine did to the Roman Empire (except the religion in that case was Christianity). The point, however, is this: The Jews are not the descendants of Abraham. Get it? God's promise in the Bible was that the seed of Abraham, Abraham's biological descendants, would be given Palestine as their homeland. The modern Jews are not that seed. Even if they were, there'd be the necessity of verifying that God actually said what he is portrayed as saying in the Old Testament, before the land of Palestine could be taken away from the Arabs who had it in 1930. But the very assertion of Biblical authority in connection with the Jews' occupation of Palestine, is a fraud. The Jews may not be the meanest-spirited people alive today, but they are certainly a contender. Blacks are violent, but seldom do they show the methodical precision or organization in their violent acts that the Jews routinely display. From Russian Bolshevism, Deir Yassin, Shatilla, Qana, and the USS Liberty to the entire Holohoax scam, the Jews have shown their meanness of spirit hundreds of times during this century, in the most dramatic manner, and have tried to cover it up afterward with a lot of talk. Provocation might be a poor excuse for wickedness, but it is sometimes an acceptable excuse for violence. If you give a reasonable man a sufficient provocation - gratuitously slapping his child in front of him, say - you should not be surprised when his fist slams into your face. That's an example, but it proves my point. Not all violence is wicked, though violence is sometimes employed by wicked people. When the Jews took Palestine away from the Palestinians, the Jews employed violence. Since my own race does not dwell these days in that part of the world, I'd be happy to let the Arabs and the Jews fight over possession of the region, as long as neither side used my money to buy their guns. The Jews required the money of Whites in order to build Israel, and they still depend on it for keeping the Arabs from taking repossession. But just because your people need this money does not mean that my people should give it to you. What you need might not be in our best interests, and our money is our money; it is not your money. I appreciate your giving me an insider's perspective on Jewish intolerance, even toward other Jews. Let me assure you, however, this intolerance is even greater - deadlier - when it is directed against the world's non-Jewish peoples, as the Germans, the Russians and the Arabs could attest.
Comments: I think that you are a complete ass. I wish that you would open up your mind
and heart and realize that there are wonderful people out there that your mising out on,
merely because your way too close minded. Try opening yourself up. It may be better for
you in the long run.
Comments: Aurore, I've been doing this for so long that I seldom hear anything that I haven't already heard many times before. Your mistake is a very common one: that of failing to see the forest (the generally harmful large-scale effects of multiculturalism and racial mixing) because of the trees (the fact that in every race there are good individuals). I've heard and answered comments such as yours before, and you'll find my replies at these addresses. Please feel free to browse them at your leisure. http://www2.netcom.com/~jna/facts/racemix.html http://pw1.netcom.com/~jna/facts/racestat.htm Wednesday May 12th 1999 12:42:01
Comments: Since you have heard this numerous times before, then why don't you take the
hint and actually look deeper into people then just their race?????? I would love to hear
and answer thanks so much.
Comments: I'm afraid that you just don't get it Aurore. Let me be a little more explicit. I've probably examined all sides of this subject more thoroughly than you have, with due recognition of behavior of people both as individuals and as members of competing ethnic groups. That is, I've considered comments such as yours before, and I've answered them before. You apparently don't want to understand that you have been answered. I'll summarize it again for you. Although you're right that there are good people in every race, I am right when I say that it is bad for races to mix in one society. The harmful consequences of ethnic struggles outweigh the benefits of having the good individuals of minority races in one's country. A good Black can be just as good in a Black country as in a White one. The world won't lose his goodness just because his race lives apart from my race. And, as a tremendous additional benefit, the world will have shed the evil caused by multiculturalism and race-mixing once the races have been gathered into separate racial homelands. Wednesday May 12th 1999 02:29:38
Name: Aaron Diamond
Name: Jerry Abbot
Name: Aaron Diamond
Name: Aaron
Well bring it on, stupid. What are you waiting for? You're the gutless moron who signed my guestbook as "Aaron Diamond" (like in "The Aaron Diamond Foundation" that you took your phony name from). I live in Alabama. You live in New York City - your web host is Level3.net and your IP address was 209.246.94.157. You don't see me everyday. You're a liar. I'll bet you're a coward too. I'll prove it by still being here a year from today.
Aaron, you are one of the reasons the Jews seem to carry the odor of mouse urine around on them. Okay, buddy, you're on. At the first of every month, I'm going to post a temporary note somewhere saying: "Hey Aaron! I'm still here!" underneath your promise to shut me down prior to 19 May 2000. When I'm still here on that day, everyone will understand that you're a runty little Jewish weasle with a big mouth and no real muscle to back it up. You've got a whole year to bring on your JDL and your Black mercenaries, and whatever other armies you have at your command. I'll be here waiting with such weaponry as I have at mine. Now enough talk: put up, or shut up.
Name: germans are no better nor aryans
Name: a jew who is proud and will sing it out loud forever
and ever
Name: Aaron Diamond
|
               |
|
Modified Tuesday, November 02, 2010 Copyright @ 2010 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party |
