|
| |
SAT Scores Down
While the College Board claims SAT math scores went up 2 points in the last
decade, reversing an opposite and opposing trend for the past four decades, they
also admit that the test changed in three VERY significant ways:
Students take one hour longer to complete the test.
Calculators can be used.
The test questions were dumbed down.
Prior to "Recentering", SAT Scores Were Already Down 75 Points
|

|
AVERAGE DAILY TV VIEWING

|
SAT SCORES

|
| 1960 |
5:06 hours |
1960 |
975 |
| 1965 |
5:29 hours |
1965 |
969 |
| 1970 |
5:56 hours |
1970 |
948 |
| 1975 |
6:07 hours |
1975 |
910 |
| 1980 |
6:36 hours |
1980 |
890 |
| 1985 |
7:07 hours |
1985 |
906 |
| 1990 |
6:55 hours |
1990 |
900 |
| Source: Nielsen Media
Research |
Source:
The College Board |

|
SAT Scores Down 17 Points in Six Years
-6 Reading
-3 Math
-8 Writing
2011 COLLEGE BOUND SENIORS AVERAGE
SAT SCORES
with score changes from 2006*
READING MATH WRITING TOTAL
ALL TEST-TAKERS 497 (- 6) 514 (- 4) 489 (- 8) 1500 (-18)
Female 495 (- 7) 500 (- 2) 496 (- 6) 1491 (- 15)
Male 500 (- 5) 531 (- 5) 482 (- 9) 1513 (- 19)
Large 2011 SAT Score Decline Shows Failure of “No Child
Left Behind"
for use with annual SAT scores release – 11:00am, Wednesday,
September 14, 2011
LARGE SAT SCORE DECLINE SHOWS FAILURE OF “NO CHILD LEFT
BEHIND” AND STATE HIGH-STAKES TESTING STRATEGY; FAIRTEST ASKS:
“HOW MANY WAKE-UP CALLS DO POLICY-MAKERS NEED?”
Plunging SAT results released today show that, “’No Child
Left Behind’ (NCLB) and state high-stakes testing programs are
undermining school quality, even when measured by other
standardized exams,” according to Bob Schaeffer, Public
Education Director of FairTest, the National Center for Fair &
Open Testing. Schaeffer continued, “With exploding cheating
scandals and declines in college readiness scores, how many
wake-up calls do policy-makers need before they admit that their
test-and-punish strategy is a failure?”
A FairTest analysis shows that overall SAT averages dropped
significantly under the NCLB federal testing mandate. At the
same time, gaps between Whites, Asians, and historically
disadvantaged African-Americans and Hispanics have been growing
larger. ACT scores, made public last month, demonstrated similar
patterns. Scores from the National Assessment of Educational
Progress (NAEP) also indicate that educational progress slowed
in the NCLB era. Under NCLB, every public school student must be
tested annually in grades three through eight and at least once
in high school in both reading and math.
“Proponents of NCLB and similar state-level testing programs
promised that overall achievement would improve while score gaps
would narrow,” Schaeffer continued. “Precisely the opposite has
taken place. Policymakers need to embrace very different
policies if they are committed to real education reform.”
Schaeffer added, “Fortunately, many colleges have recognized
the folly of fixating on the narrow, often inaccurate,
information provided by standardized tests and moved toward
test-optional admissions.” According to a free web database
maintained by FairTest
(http:www.fairtest.org/university/optional), more than 860
accredited, bachelor-degree granting institutions make
admissions decisions about all or many applicants without regard
to SAT or ACT scores. The list includes 35 of the nation’s 100
top-ranked liberal arts colleges.
- - 3 0 - -
http://www.good.is/post/why-sat-scores-are-down-and-why-it-matters/
Why SAT Scores Are Down—And Why it Matters

Are high school students college and career-ready? Not according
to the
latest data from the College Board, the makers of the SAT.
Average scores for each of the three test sections declined this
year, continuing a downward trend. Average critical reading
portion of the test fell to 497 out of 800, the lowest level in
the history of the SAT. Math scores fell to an average of 514
and the writing score dropped to 489.
The College Board says the downward trajectory is due to more
students—and a more diverse population from varied academic
backgrounds—taking the test, which they say is a good thing
overall. Indeed, of the 1.65 million SAT takers in 2011, 44
percent were non-white students, 36 percent were the first in
their family to go to college and 27 percent spoke a language
other than English at home. But are declining scores really an
inevitable result of democratizing the SAT?
Not according to Bob Schaeffer, public education director of
FairTest, the National Center
for Fair & Open Testing, a nonprofit that "works to end the
misuses and flaws of standardized testing." Schaeffer says the
real reason SAT scores have declined for the past five years is
because of the detrimental impacts of the No Child Left Behind
Act.
NCLB's narrow focus on reading and math test scores drives
what's taught in many U.S. schools, particularly those serving
minority and low-income students. "Education is dumbed down so
that those kids do nothing more than a series of worksheets,"
says Schaeffer, "and that doesn't translate to the SAT."
That's because the SAT isn't a curriculum-linked test—one
that requires memorizing facts. Students need strong critical
thinking skills to perform well, and those aren't skills that
are part of state-mandated standardized test prep. What's worse,
those same skills are the ones that translate to college and
intellectually challenging careers, so much more than a SAT
score is at stake.
Income has long been known as "one of the strongest
predictors of test scores of all types. Well-off families,
Schaeffer says, "can buy a private school education or buy
themselves into a community where the tests are not a dominant
factor." Unsurprisingly, cumulative SAT scores for students from
families earning more than $200,000 a year continue to rise. But
without a shift in what and how everyone else is taught to
everyone else, those SAT scores may well continue to decline.
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/sep/15/nation/la-na-0914-sat-scores-20110915
SAT scores for class of 2011 decline in every
aspect
Average SAT exam scores for high school seniors dropped three points in
reading, one point in math and two points in writing, the College Board
reports. Reading scores are the lowest on record.
September 15, 2011|By
Carla Rivera, Los Angeles Times
The high school graduating class of 2011 lost ground on every measure
of the SAT exam, with reading scores nationally the lowest on record,
prompting concern about whether students are being adequately prepared
for college, officials said Wednesday.
Average SAT scores for high school seniors dropped three points in
reading, one point in math and two points in writing, according to a
report by the College Board, a New York-based nonprofit that administers
the SAT and Advanced Placement program.
The combined average SAT score of 1500 was six points below last year and
18 points off the 2006 mark. A perfect score on the three-section test is
2400.
Average SAT scores for California's high school seniors also dipped
slightly compared with last year, with test takers averaging 1,513 points.
Students in the state scored an average of 499 in critical reading, 515 in
mathematics and 499 in writing. The score for critical reading was down two
points and for math and writing were each down one point from 2010.
The College Board said that more students than ever are taking the exam,
nearly 1.65 million nationally, 222,658 of them in California. That
represents 53% of California high school graduates, up 4% from 2010 and 13%
from 2007. Nearly 65% of California test takers were ethnic minorities.
The increasing representation of students from varied ethnic, economic
and academic backgrounds may factor into the lower scores nationally, said
College Board leaders, who noted that there were also more high-performing
students in the class of 2011 than before.
"We've made great strides in the past five or 10 years in increasing
access," Wayne Camara, vice president of research and development, said
during a telephone briefing. "As we reach more students who have less
resources, scores will tend to drop."
But Camara acknowledged that the downward trend is cause for concern, and
he suggested that national, state and local educators look to the rigor of
school curriculum.
The SAT report found, for example, that students who completed a core
high school curriculum — defined as four or more years of English, three of
math, three of natural science and three of social science and history —
scored 143 points higher on average than those who did not take those
courses.
Last month, the annual scores released by an SAT rival exam, the ACT,
found that only about 25% of the class of 2011 met college readiness
benchmarks in English composition, college algebra, introductory social
science and biology. The benchmarks suggest the students would succeed
without the need for remedial instruction.
Other experts said that recent efforts to better prepare students in
advanced math and science have not been matched in reading and writing. The
newest SAT scores should raise a red flag for policymakers, said Jim Hull,
senior policy analyst for the National School Boards Assn.'s Center for
Public Education.
"Everyone thinks of 21st century skills as math, science and computers,
but we're finding that being able to communicate with the written word in a
variety of formats is going to be one of the most essential tools," Hull
said.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/nationnow/2011/09/sat-reading-and-math-scores-down-in-2011-says-college-board.html
September 14, 2011 |
1:21pm
This post has been corrected. See the note at the bottom for
details.
More bad news on the national education front: The College Board
announced Wednesday that the mean SAT reading score for the high school
class of 2011 fell 3 points from 2010's mean -- to 497, making it the
lowest reading score since 1972.
The average math score dipped to 489, 1 point lower than last year.
And the mean writing score dropped 2 points from last year's score.
And then there's this: The board found that just 43% of college-bound
seniors met the SAT benchmark score of 1550 (the critical-reading,
mathematics and writing scores combined). The benchmark score indicates
that a student has a 65% likelihood of achieving a B- or higher during
the first year of college. And remember, that's 43% of students who are
planning to go to college.
Not awesome.
In a statement sent to news outlets, Jeanne Allen, president of the
Center for Education Reform, articulated what some people might feel
after reading the SAT report. "Student achievement remains stagnant and
we continue to let failure fester in our education system, jeopardizing
the future of our children and our country," she said.
The organization that offers the ACT, the nation's other
college-entrance exam, recently
announced that just 25% of students who took its test met all four
of that group's readiness benchmarks.
But the College Board managed to put some positive spin on the
seemingly dire statistics. In the news release, the board pointed out
that more college-bound students in the class of 2011 took the SAT than
any other high-school graduating class in history. Also, the class of
2011 was the most diverse class in history to take the SAT.
According to the College Board, as different types of students start
taking the SAT, it is inevitable that scores will go down. But the board
managed to work in this cheerful note: "However, a decline in mean
scores does not necessarily mean a decline in performance. There are
more high-performing students among the class of 2011 than ever before."
Here is some
more information about the people who took the SAT in 2011:
 | 44% were minority students. |
 | 36% were first-generation college-goers. |
 | 27% reported that English was not the only language first
learned at home. |
And for those of you who still get upset when recalling the stress of
the SAT experience, the College Board adds this: "The
College Board continues to advise that, for individual high-stakes
decisions such as admission, SAT scores should always be used together
with high school grades and other factors."
Amen.
[For the record, Sept. 14, 2:22 p.m.: An earlier
version of this post incorrectly said the average scores in reading and
math were down. The College Board says it is mean scores that are down.]
http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=171
Question:
What are the average scores for students taking the SAT?
Response:
The SAT (formerly known as the Scholastic Assessment Test and the
Scholastic Aptitude Test) is not designed as an indicator of student
achievement, but rather as an aid for predicting how well students will
do in college. Between 1998–99 and 2004–05, the mathematics SAT average
score increased by 9 points, but it declined by 4 points between 2004–05
and 2009–10. The critical reading average score in 2009–10 (501) was 4
points lower than in 1998–99.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for
Education Statistics. (2011). Digest of Education Statistics, 2010
(NCES 2011-015),
Chapter 2.
| SAT mean scores of
college-bound seniors, by race/ethnicity: Selected years,
1990–91 through 2009–10 |
| Race/ethnicity
|
1990–91 |
1996–97 |
1998–99 |
1999–2000 |
2000–01 |
2001–02 |
2002–03 |
2003–04 |
2004–05 |
2005–06 |
2006–07 |
2007–08 |
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
| SAT-Critical reading
|
| All students |
499 |
505 |
505 |
505 |
506 |
504 |
507 |
508 |
508 |
503 |
502 |
502 |
501 |
501 |
| White |
518 |
526 |
527 |
528 |
529 |
527 |
529 |
528 |
532 |
527 |
527 |
528 |
528 |
528 |
| Black |
427 |
434 |
434 |
434 |
433 |
430 |
431 |
430 |
433 |
434 |
433 |
430 |
429 |
429 |
| Mexican American |
454 |
451 |
453 |
453 |
451 |
446 |
448 |
451 |
453 |
454 |
455 |
454 |
453 |
454 |
| Puerto Rican |
436 |
454 |
455 |
456 |
457 |
455 |
456 |
457 |
460 |
459 |
459 |
456 |
452 |
454 |
| Other Hispanic |
458 |
466 |
463 |
461 |
460 |
458 |
457 |
461 |
463 |
458 |
459 |
455 |
455 |
454 |
| Asian/Pacific Islander |
485 |
496 |
498 |
499 |
501 |
501 |
508 |
507 |
511 |
510 |
514 |
513 |
516 |
519 |
| American Indian/Alaska Native |
470 |
475 |
484 |
482 |
481 |
479 |
480 |
483 |
489 |
487 |
487 |
485 |
486 |
485 |
| Other |
486 |
512 |
511 |
508 |
503 |
502 |
501 |
494 |
495 |
494 |
497 |
496 |
494 |
494 |
| SAT-Mathematics
|
|
All students |
500 |
511 |
511 |
514 |
514 |
516 |
519 |
518 |
520 |
518 |
515 |
515 |
515 |
516 |
| White |
513 |
526 |
528 |
530 |
531 |
533 |
534 |
531 |
536 |
536 |
534 |
537 |
536 |
536 |
| Black |
419 |
423 |
422 |
426 |
426 |
427 |
426 |
427 |
431 |
429 |
429 |
426 |
426 |
428 |
| Mexican American |
459 |
458 |
456 |
460 |
458 |
457 |
457 |
458 |
463 |
465 |
466 |
463 |
463 |
467 |
| Puerto Rican |
439 |
447 |
448 |
451 |
451 |
451 |
453 |
452 |
457 |
456 |
454 |
453 |
450 |
452 |
| Other Hispanic |
462 |
468 |
464 |
467 |
465 |
464 |
464 |
465 |
469 |
463 |
463 |
461 |
461 |
462 |
| Asian/Pacific Islander |
548 |
560 |
560 |
565 |
566 |
569 |
575 |
577 |
580 |
578 |
578 |
581 |
587 |
591 |
| American Indian/Alaska Native |
468 |
475 |
481 |
481 |
479 |
483 |
482 |
488 |
493 |
494 |
494 |
491 |
493 |
492 |
| Other |
492 |
514 |
513 |
515 |
512 |
514 |
513 |
508 |
513 |
513 |
512 |
512 |
514 |
514 |
NOTE: Data are for seniors who took the SAT any time
during their high school years through March of their senior year. If a
student took a test more than once, the most recent score was used. The
SAT was formerly known as the Scholastic Assessment Test and the
Scholastic Aptitude Test. Possible scores on each part of the SAT range
from 200 to 800. The critical reading section was formerly known as the
verbal section.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for
Education Statistics. (2011). Digest of Education Statistics, 2010
(NCES 2011-015),
Table 151.
| |
|