World Population

Source:  U.S. Bureau of the Census, WORLD POPULATION PROFILE:   1996   Appendix table A-4

INDIA AND CHINA ADD 1.4 BILLION MORE PEOPLE IN HALF A CENTURY

Between 1950 and 2000, a period of 50 years, the world population more than doubled, from 2.56 billion to 5.77 billion, an annual growth rate of 1.5%.  Most of that growth was in the less developed countries where the population grew from 1.7 to 4.9 billion.  The population of India increased 3.5 fold (2.5% per year) and of China 2.5 fold (1.7%/year), adding another 1.4 billion people to the world, the equivalent of 5 TIMES the total US population and 6 TIMES the US White population.

The slowest growing countries were in Eastern Europe where growth was either flat or less than 10%.  The population of Russia actually decreased during some of those years.  Even Belgium, Italy, the UK, Portugal, Austria, and Denmark experienced growth  of less than 20% over this half century. The 1.75 fold increase in the US population (1.1% per year) was quite a bit higher than the 25% growth in Western Europe, but just the increase in the number of people in China and India was five times larger than our total population. 

AFRICAN POPULATIONS INCREASED SEVEN FOLD IN HALF A CENTURY

Many of the fastest growing countries during this time were Arab and African countries.   The population of the United Arab Emirates increased 84 fold (8.1%/year), of Qatar 29 fold (6.5%/year), and of Kuwait 24 fold (5.8%/year).  The populations of Namibia, Benin, Nigeria, Liberia, Sudan, Senegal, Swaziland, Cote d'Ivoire, Togo, and French Guiana increased more than seven fold, or more than 4% per year.

Many of the countries with the fastest growing populations are also the ones with the shortest life expectancies, and vice versa.  The life expectancy of men in Rwanda is only 33 years, but their population increased almost five fold, whereas the life expectancy for men in Japan is 80 years, but their population increased only 50%.

POPULATION OF BLACKS IN AFRICA IN THE NEXT HALF CENTURY

EVEN WITH AIDS, WILL INCREASE ANOTHER 963 MILLION, from 802.7 to 1,766 million

Nov .3, 2011 update:

The ACTUAL population of Africa in 2010 was 1,030 million, so the US Census Bureau projection was TOO LOW by FIFTY THREE MILLION, or 5.4%.  If the population projection for 2050 is also low by 5.4% (an extremely conservative estimate), then rather than  1,786 million in 2050, there will be 1,882 million, an increase of 852.9 million in only 40 years, and 1,079.3 million in the first half of the 21st Century ALONE  Or it might be even higher, as this appears to be an asymptotic grown rate, not a linear one as in the US and China..

A simple projection of fifty years of population grown in Africa indicates that the population in 2010 should have been 814.4 million. So the census Bureau projection of 977.4 million was actually higher than expected, particularly since many of their projections included [allegedly] decreasing populations of some African countries due to AIDS. For the ACTUAL population of Africa to be 1,030 million (52.6 million higher than the Census Bureau projection and 215.6 million higher than a continuation of the historic African population growth), the effects of AIDS (if any) must have been to ACCELERATE the African population growth, not to decrease it.

That's not an impossible scenario.  If there was a wide-spread fear that your own race would die out due to an epidemic, this might cause you to increase an already out of control reproduction rate.  But this seems VERY unlikely.  The most likely scenario is that AIDS in Africa was invented in order to obfuscate the very real danger of an out of control African population explosion, or to cause gullible world citizens to flood Africa with money, food, and other aid, which actually accelerated the problem.

But that's the good news.  The bad news is that Africa's population growth rate is asymptotic, our experts at the US Census Bureau seem to be unable to figure this out, and the REAL population of Africa actually could reach 3 BILLION within half a century.  While India's population is also growing asymptotically, Africa could still overtake India by 2030.  And while India predicts that their population will be larger than China by 2050, this actually could happen as early as 2030.

By any normal population growth pattern, we would expect the population of Africa in 2050 to be between 1,200 to 1,400 million, much lower than the 1,786 million predicted by the Census Bureau.  But this bump in the growth curve is PROOF that AIDS has had no negative effect on the growth curve and makes it almost certain that it will be at least 2,700 million, almost a billion higher

U.S. POPULATION GREW ONLY 1% PER YEAR

Twenty million of the 124 million increase in our population was due to immigration, so immigrants (many of them illegal aliens) accounted for 16% of our population growth.  Had it not been for them, the growth would have been only 68% (1%/year). If the world population were to continue to grow over the next two centuries at this U.S. natural growth rate, there would be 44.5 billion people in the world by the year 2200.  If if were to continue to grow at this rate for the next 4,000 years, there would be 1 x 10 to the 27th power (1 followed by 27 zeros) people in the world.  If it were to grow at the same rate as it's grown over the last 50 years, there would be 195 billion by the year 2200, and 8 x 10 to the 39th power (8 followed by 39 zeros) within 4,000 years.

If it were to grow at a rate equivalent to Africa's rate over the last half century, then it would be 955 billion by the year 2200 and 5 x 10 to the 53rd power (5 followed by 53 zeros) within 4,000 years, and at the rate Quatar has grown, it would be 1.8 quadrillion by 2200 and 1 x 10 to the 119th power (1 followed by 119 zeros) within 4,000 years.  If Quatar's half million population alone were to continue to grow like it has, then it would have a population of 173 billion by 2200 and 1 x 10 to the 39th power (1 followed by 39 zeros) within 4,000 years.  Within 147 years its population alone would be larger than the world population is today.

Obviously most of this isn't going to happen.   Over the next two centuries, disease, famine, war, AIDS, cancer, other immunological diseases we haven't even heard of, and a whole host of other population control measures will prevent the world population from growing much larger than 200 billion.

The 2000 census showed the following breakdown of population by race:

97.6% = One race

2.4% = Two or more races

75.1% = White Race

69.1% = Non-Hispanic White Race

6.0% = Hispanic White Race

12.5% = Hispanic or Latino

7.3% = Mexican

1.2% = Puerto Rican

0.4% = Cuban

3.6% = Other Hispanic or Latino

12.3% = Black

0.9% = Indian

3.6% = Asian

0.1% = Pacific Islander

According to this US Census Bureau survey: 

·         68.1% = non-latrino Whites

·         6% = latrino Whites

·         6.5% = non-White latrinos

·         12.4% = niggers

·         3.6% = Asians

·         0.9% = Indians

·         2.4% = mamzers, of whom 1.4% are kikes 

To put this in terms that even a kikette can grasp, if you were in a room full of 100 people who were a representative cross section of our population, there would be: 

·         68 pure Whites

·         6 latrino Whites

·         7 non-White latrinos

·         12 niggers

·         4 chinks

·         1 Indian

·         1 mamzer

·         1 kike

Iow,

1.       in a pure democracy, and if Whites were wolves and muds were sheep, we could vote to have muds for dinner and be done with it.

2.       In the unlikely event that latrino Whites voted on our side, we could pass a constitutional amendment to BANISH all muds from our shores.

3.       If we were to follow THEIR advice and “reduced [sic] this issue to a matter of brute force and empowerment”, we’d just pull out our machetes and our 280 million guns, and in ONE DAY, be a glorious all-White nigger-free civilization, once again.

If anyone thinks that’s not a PROBABILITY, think again, and research exactly what happened to the Whigs not that long ago who thought exactly the same thing.

The fact that it would take the world 4,850 years to grow from two people to 6 billion if it were to grow at a rate equivalent to the UK's might give us some encouragement that it's possible that it would take this long, except that only a few regions of the world have had such a low growth rate recently.  At the world average it would take only 1,321 years, and there's no reason to believe that the recent world average isn't considerably lower than it was before the birth control pill and widespread availability of abortions.  Even North Africa now has the pill and abortions, and it would take only 660 years to reach 6 billion at their rate.  And if it grew at Iraq's rate, we're down to only 525 years.

OVER 40 GENERATIONS THE AVERAGE PERSON HAS 1.1 TRILLION ANCESTORS

With few exceptions, every citizen in monogamous countries like the US have 8 great grandparents and 16 great great grandparents.  The only way for an exception to occur is if one of your male ancestors had multiple wives who were your female ancestors.  For example, if one of your great great grandfathers had had four wives, and if each of these wives were your great great grandmothers (something that requires a lot of incest), then rather than having 16 great great grandparents, you would have only 13 (8 great great grandmothers and only 5 rather than 8 great great grandfathers).  If all of your great great grandfathers had four wives, and if all of their wives were your great great grandmothers, then the least number of great great grandparents you could have had is 10 (8 gggm and 2 gggf).

If we assume that one generation has averaged 20 years ever since God created Adam, and that there has been NO incest since then, then every American citizen would have had to have had 8 great grandparents, 16 great great grandparents, 1,024 ancestors just 10 generations ago, 33,554,432 ancestors 25 generations ago, 1.1 trillion ancestors 40 generations ago, 2 x 10 to the 30th power 100 generations ago, and 2 x 10 to the 60th power 200 generations ago [read: Adam and Eve].

The problem of course is that there aren't enough ancestors to go around.  Just going back 33 generations requires more ancestors than there are people in the world today.  The US Census Bureau estimates that the world population at the time of Christ's birth was 200 million, but this would have been 100 generations ago, and each of us would have been descendants of 2 x 10 to the 30th power ancestors at His birth (1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times as many ancestors as there were people).

Not even compensating for incest can explain this discrepancy.  If we assume a high rate of incest, and that each man had children by four wives, and that every generation had only 12 rather than 16 great great grandparents (something that requires us to ignore the simple fact that there are more women than men in the world), then we would have only 137 ancestors ten generations ago, 59,855 ancestors twenty five generations ago, 26,209,973 forty generations ago, 1 x 10 to the 17th power one hundred generations ago, and 4 x 10 to the 35th power 200 generations ago:

JACOB COULD NOT HAVE BEEN BORN MORE THAN 1,500 YEARS AGO

If each of the 10 sons and 2 grandsons of Jacob who were the patriarchs of the Twelve Tribes of Israel had married only within their own race, and if each of these tribes had restricted marriage to only other members of the tribe, and if they had experienced a population growth rate equivalent to the current world population growth rate, and if they were born 1,258 years ago, then their descendants alone would constitute the entire world's population today.  If it were at all possible for them to have had a low population growth rate like ours without abortions or the birth control pill, they still would have grown to more than 6 billion people in less than 1,500 years.  If they were born 1,800 years before Christ, they would have had to have had a population growth rate of less than 0.58% per year in order to constitute only 6 billion of today's world population.

A problem is that Israelites are only 1/6th of the world's population, so where did the other 5/6ths come from, or go?  And for them to grow from only 70 people in Egypt to 3 million people during the exodus 420 years later required a growth rate of 2.6%.  At that rate, 70 Israelites would become a billion Israelites, their known population today, in only 643 years.

Only a few countries in the entire world have such a low population growth rate, and that's only because of very recent intentional efforts to curb population growth, and planned emigration, rather than any long term trends.  And this low population growth rate affects less than 5% of the world's population, so even if all of those countries had experienced a growth rate equivalent to the rest of the world, there would have been only 2% more people in the world now than there were. When you consider that countries like Nigeria who were in the midst of AIDS epidemics, low life expectancies, starvation, and war experienced an almost four fold increase in its population in half a century (a rate equivalent to the Israelites in Egypt), and Iraq who experienced a five fold increase even with several major wars against Iran and the US, these low population growth estimates for Israelites seem almost impossible.

WWII AND JEWS

According to jewish sources, the population of jews in 1988 was 18.1 million, which is 19% higher than it was in 1941, at 15.2 million.  But the population of Western Europe in 1941 was 352 million and only 373.8 million by 1988, which means that the overall population growth rate of Western Europe during that same time was only 6.2%.  So during this timeframe that "six million jews died in a holocaust", the worldwide population of jews increased more than three times faster than the population of all of Western Europe.

THE CRISIS IN THE WHITE POPULATION

The following graph illustrates just how quickly the White Race could become extinct.  While the populations of Europe, Russia, and the US have levelled off and even decreased, the populations of China and Africa are accelerating beyond all expectations.  In addition, immigration reduced the percentage of Whites in the US from 99% when the US Constitution was written to only 71% today, and similar patterns are being followed in several European countries who are on the edge of revolution because of the failure by their governments to do anything about unbridled immigration of third world muds.

The following graph illustrates another crisis, a crisis in the credibility of the very governments which should have done something about it, but instead did everything in their power to destroy the Caucasian Race.  Had it not been for the complicity of their own governments, the population of Caucasians in Europe would now be 50% higher than it is, or 1.2 billion rather than only 800 million.  But the complicity of Lenin and Trotsky in Russia (jews), Hitler in Germany (an "Austrian" jew), Churchill (an avowed zionist) and his adviser Amery (a jew) in England, Roosevelt and Eisenhower (both jews) in the US, and the complicity of "American" banker Jacob Schiff (the jew who funded both sides of the Russo-Japanese War, as well as the Japanese during WWII, using OUR dollars), made the Twentieth Century one of the bloodiest in the history of Caucasians.

The growth rate of Caucasians in Europe since the end of WWII illustrates how the European population would have grown had it not been for WWI and WWII.  Projecting this growth rate back to the known population of Europe in 1800 provides an opportunity to compare what did happen with what would have happened without two major jewish inspired wars.  The casualties of these two wars aren't just the hundred million Caucasians who suffered immediate deaths.  The lives of hundreds of millions of others were shattered by the loss of loved ones, injuries that killed them at an earlier age, and their posterity who were never born.  The real loss of Caucasian lives due to this century of wars was more than 400 million.

U.S. POPULATION MIX

The U.S. Census Bureau Table DP-1, Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000 reports that 97.6% of Americans claim to be "one race" and 2.4% claim to be "two or more races", that 75.1% claim to be "White", 12.3% claim to be "Black", 0.9% claim to be Indian, 3.6% claim to be Asian, 0.1% claim to be Pacific Islander, and 5.5% claim to be "some other race".  Of the Asians, 0.6% claim to be Asian Indian, 0.9% claim to be Chinese, 0.7% claim to be Filipino, 0.3% claim to be Japanese, 0.4% claim to be Korean, 0.4% claim to be Vietnamese, and 0.5% claim to be "Other Asian".  12.5% claim to be Hispanic or Latino, and of the 75.1% who claim to be "White", 6% claim to be Hispanic or Latino, leaving 69.1% who are non-Hispanic White.

Had the more than two thirds of Americans whose only choice was "non-Hispanic White" been given the choices "Caucasian" or "Israelite" or "White Christian Israelite", it's likely that most of them would have selected these categories.

ANNUAL GROWTH RATES IN FIFTY YEARS

0.5% = 1.28 x

1% = 1.64 x

1.5% = 2.11 x

2.0% = 2.69 x

2.5% = 3.44 x

3.0% = 4.38 x

3.5% = 5.58 x

4.0% = 7.11 x

4.5% = 9.03 x

5.0% = 11.47 x

2011 Update

Between 1950 and 2010, 60 years, the population of China increased  774,138,236 and the population of India increased 819,292,906.  Just the amount of the increase in India is 2.6 TIMES the entire population of the US, and just the amount of the increase in China is 2.5 TIMES.  The population of Africa today is 1,030,000,000, up from 227,330,000 in 1950.  This increase of 802,670,000 JUST in the last 60 years is more than 2.5 TIMES the entire current US population.  Relative to the current total population of Whites in the US, JUST the increase in China was 3.6 times larger, just the increase in India was 3.8 times larger, and JUST the increase in Africa was 3.7 times larger.

In 2000, when the population of Africa was only 727 million, the US Census Bureau was worried about AIDS in Africa and predicted that by 2010, its population would grow by "only" 250 million, to 977 million. That was already an out of control population growth rate, but they were off by FIFTY THREE MILLION AFRICANS. The ACTUAL increase in the population of Africa in ONE DECADE was 303 million.  So JUST the increase in JUST the Black population in JUST Africa in JUST one decade, was greater than the amount by which the North American population increased since Columbus got here 610 years ago.

http://www.census.gov/population/international/data/idb/rank.php

Copyright @ 2010 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party