|
|
NPR *CENSORS* ScriptureFirst, this organization which depends on CHRISTIAN TAXPAYERS for it's *existence* CENSORED five Verses of Scripture which were posted with no comment, and then CLOSED the forum when it didn't like the TRUTH which was presented to counteract their LIES!! Update January 21, 2011: AGAIN NPR censored these five key verses from OUR Holy Bible:
The discussion was about a teacher who was removed for attempting to censor the free speech and religious rights of one of his students:The SCRIPTURE which was CENSORED, which was posted with NO COMMENTS, is the following: But I tell you that it will be more bearable for Sodom on the day of judgment than for you, Matthew 11:24 There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel. Deuteronomy 23:17 And there were also sodomites in the land: and they did according to all the abominations of the nations which the LORD cast out before the children of Israel. 1Kings 14:24 They die in youth, and their life is among the sodomites. Job 36:14 `And a man who lieth with a male as one lieth with a woman; abomination both of them have done; they are certainly put to death; their blood is on them. Lev 20:13 Here’s the message "explaining" why SCRIPTURE should be CENSORED: Recent Activity
John Knight Community Discussion RulesThe following text serves as the official discussion policy for users of NPR.org’s social networking tools. All participants in NPR.org social networking features, story/blog commenting, and other forums are required to follow these rules, in addition to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy for NPR.org. Every website has its own rules, and these are our rules for participating in NPR social networking features, including discussions and comments. If you break them, don’t be surprised if we block your comments. First things first: If you can’t be polite, don’t say it. Of course, we don’t want to stifle discussion of controversial issues. Some topics require blunt talk, and we’re not always going to agree with each other. Nonetheless, please try to disagree without being disagreeable. Focus your remarks on positions, not personalities. No personal attacks, name calling, libel, defamation, comments about someone’s mother, hate speech, comparisons to notorious dictators – you get the idea. And under no circumstances should you post anything that could be taken as threatening, harassing, bullying, obscene, pornographic, sexist or racist. Don’t use obscenities CommentsDiscussions for this story are now closed. Please see the Community FAQ for more information.
NPR Is Nothing but a HAVEN for the Depraved
60% More References to jews than JesusSearching the NPR Web Sitehttp://www.npr.org/search/index.php?searchinput=jewish
gays = 3,090
Jesus = 2,000 Jewish = 3,240 marriage = 3,420 gay marriage = 1,850 THEY DO NOT DESERVE TAX DOLLARS FROM THIS PUTATIVE CHRISTIAN NATION!!
CommentsDiscussions for this story are now closed. Please see the Community FAQ for more information. 
Rense.com Is There A Jewish Bias At NPR? NPR Dismisses Long Time Popular Host Of Morning Edition Commentary By Robert H. Countess, Ph.D. 6-10-4 On NPR and the dismissal of the Gentile Bob Edwards, host of Morning Edition. As I recall, Bob Edwards was a Gentile from Kentucky and hosted the National Public Radio show MORNING EDITION for many years until a few weeks ago. Prior to Morning Edition, he hosted the NPR afternoon show ALL THINGS CONSIDERED. It was this latter show to which I took my sons back around 1975 in downtown District of Columbia and we sat in the studio for 90 minutes watching the live presentation of this highly popular national program. At that time, ATC was co-hosted by Susan Stamberg and the news read by Dianne Dimont (both Jewish). This past week while vacationing on the Gulf Shore, I listened to Morning Edition to learn who had taken Bob Edwards' place and I heard Steve Insky (Jewish) as host. I assume that he is permanent. Saturday morning, NPR is hosted by Scott Simon (Jewish) (with frequent appearances by the Jewish commentator Daniel Shorr); the afternoon ATC is pegged to Robert Segal and Linda Wertheimer (both Jewish) [with occasional subs being Terry Gross (Jewish) and an occasional Gentile]; Sunday morning's show seems regularly led by a female Gentile whose name escapes me at the moment. When traveling, I always tune in NPR for news and commentary articles if for nothing else than the high quality of the presentations and the length of the piece. NPR truly has some enormous strengths. But over the past thirty years, I have learned much from NPR and the main lesson learned is that it Page 1 of 2 Is There A Jewish Bias At NPR? 6/12/04 http://www.rense.com/general53/vua.htm Disclaimer Email This Article MainPage http://www.rense.com This Site Served by TheHostPros has all the appearances of being "National Public Jewish Radio." Now, I make this statement as a statement of *fact* based on observation. Commonly, there are stories promoting Yiddish this and that, this and that Holocaust 'survivor' and his/her book or tale of woe, anti -German/Nazi stories and reports but NEVER a story on the Jew Karl Marx and his Judeo- Bolshevism and the genocide led by Soviet Jews against tens of millions of Christian or secular Slavs and other Gentiles from 1917 on. My question to readers of this site is: Have I erred in my statements of fact about NPR? Have others noticed the blatant Jewish takeover of this network, supposedly belonging to THE American People, yet clearly a Jewish mouthpiece with NO LONGER disguised Jewish interests and persons as dominant? I shall continue to listen to NPR, but I gave up financial support nearly twenty years ago when the local Rabbi in Huntsville and the Jewess producer of my midday live talk show conspired to force me off the station. They succeeded and I was out by May of 1987. C'est la vie! Robert H. Countess, Ph.D. Ancient Greek |
               |
|
Modified Tuesday, November 02, 2010 Copyright @ 2010 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party |
John Knight (johnknight) wrote:
Should it come to any surprise to you that Christians (and Muslims, and Hindus, and Buddhists, and Shintoists) are COMMANDED to have nothing to do with sinners, particularly with gays?:
Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the LORD thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brethren. Deuteronomy 17:15
And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed. 2 Thessalonians 3:14
"Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee? I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies", Psalms 139:21-22
But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person, 1 Corinthians 5:13
Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbor", Leviticus 19:15
"Ye shall not respect persons in judgment; but ye shall hear the small as well as the great; ye shall not be afraid of the face of man; for the judgment is God's: and the cause that is too
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 2:00:45 PM
Recommend (0)
Report abuse
GPRP GPRP (GPRP) wrote:
John Knight (johnknight) on Monday, November 22, 2010 @ 12:22:23 PM wrote: “We should add that the penalty for gay marriages under most world religions is the death penalty, just as it is in the Holy Bible, and just as it was in this very country for the majority of our history."
Yeah, and for a large part of history death was the penalty for believing in the wrong religion. Maybe we should revive that proud tradition too. After all, as far as this Jew is concerned, you, sir, are a godless goy!
(Fortunately, unlike you, I believe in the principles this nation was founded on. So, while I may not agree with what you believe, I shall defend to the death your right to believe it. HOWEVER, I shall also fight to the death any attempt to impose that belief on others!)
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 2:25:14 AM
Recommend (0)
Report abuse
GPRP GPRP (GPRP) wrote:
To John Knight (johnknight), writing on Monday, November 22, 2010 @ 5:39:59 PM:
To answer your question (sarcastically): What about the rights of people whose religion requires them NOT to associate with Jews? What about the rights of voters in Mississippi who voted for segregationists and against integration, etc.? Don't THEY have rights? And why should the rights of the great majority be denied to the benefit of any minority?
The ultimate answer to your question consists of two phrases, one in law and one in principle:
1) nor shall any state . . . deny to any person . . . the equal protection of the laws (14th Amendment).
2) We hold these truths to self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (Declaration of Independence).
Sometimes, the majority does NOT rule.
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 2:20:00 AM
Recommend (0)
Report abuse
Tom Vee (TimVee) wrote:
In an earlier post I talked about how the teacher was suspended for asking the girl to take off a confederate flag belt. These are a couple of books that I found. These books have a lot of great information on protecting your christian heritage, that were white and slaves. Most white people do not even want to talk about. What recourse do they have? Hurry up, protect your heritage!
MAKING OF THE WHITEMAN (Paperback)PAUL LAWRENCE GUTHRIE
THEY WERE WHITE AND THEY WERE SLAVES The Untold History of the Enslavement of Whites in Early America.
WHITE CARGO, The Forgotten History of Britain’s White Slaves in America. By Don Jordan and Michael Walsh.
Monday, November 22, 2010 8:20:40 PM
Recommend (0)
Report abuse
Irene Cardenas (irenesee) wrote:
I’ve read that people with brain damage exhibit inappropriate behavior. That indicates situations that dement people would lead to more impropriety. Research on animals shows that being welcomed into the group heals trauma, so it's not lasting. If each group doesn't welcome the other, can that then dement or traumatize brains on both sides, especially over time? Don’t many people who prefer their own associations form their own schools? I read that Jesus lived with people who studied in nature, where they felt they could walk alongside the angels of the “Earthly Mother," like the “Angel of Earth." Even if it’s examined for academic purposes, the Essene Gospel states: “Let us worship the Lord in her!" The Bible reports Jesus often taught in nature, e.g. by a lake. Research now shows the brain functions, grows and heals much better in nature. The Essenes felt the Heavenly Father’s “laws are engraved in the forehead of the Son of Man." Would they then think that which dements brains also blocks God? If foreheads work better in nature, what does teaching in classrooms do to them? To cultivate more propriety without doing what could result in impropriety, could the focus be on fully accepting all of one’s true and deepest nature?
Monday, November 22, 2010 6:53:34 PM
Recommend (0)
Report abuse
Tom Vee (TimVee) wrote:
If people don't like the fact that someone is gay because their religious beliefs dictate this...It does not give them the right to bully, embarass, harass, stalk, etc. Because it is abusive. Do the religious teachings teach people to practice nonabusive methods to communicate with people? As far as people not having rights...Why do people care if gay marriages are legal? It does not affect them. And if it bothers them, that much, ignore it...do not associate with them. You have the right to practice your religion.
Monday, November 22, 2010 6:42:09 PM
Recommend (0)
Report abuse
Irene Cardenas (irenesee) wrote:
When I wrote “be punished" below, I also mean “have their rights and liberties revoked."
Monday, November 22, 2010 5:40:18 PM
Recommend (0)
Report abuse
John Knight (johnknight) wrote:
What about the rights of people whose religion requires them NOT to associate with gays? What about the rights of the 85% of the voters in Mississippi who voted against gay marriage, or the 76% in Texas, or the 72% in Kentucky, or the 70% in Nebraska? Don't THEY have rights? And why should the rights of the great majority be denied to the benefit only to the 1% who CLAIM to be gay?
Monday, November 22, 2010 5:39:59 PM
Recommend (1)
Report abuse
Tom Vee (TimVee) wrote:
First of all, I am gay and have southern ancenstry that fought the civil war. I believe that McDowell and a lot of other "teachers" may want to re-evaluate the civil war teachings. Because, most of the whites (around 70%) were brought to the colonies, from Europe, were in fact slaves--which slaves are you people referring to? They were Europes unwanted white people and they were brought to the colonies as many misnomers. I believe that McDowell was in the wrong for asking the girl to remove her belt because most people could care less whether or not a person is gay. Finally, I think that removing children from a classroom due to making inappropriate comments is a standard procedure. However, the school district may want to find an alternate method to restructure the children's thinking around hatred of gays.
Monday, November 22, 2010 5:31:48 PM
Recommend (0)
Report abuse
Irene Cardenas (irenesee) wrote:
Now measures can be taken to see how statements affect other people physiologically. Data can be collected with EEGs, ECGs and skin galvanometers in studies of thousands of people. When people continually focus on others as being sinful, bad and inappropriate, telling them they'll be punished for doing wrong, how does that affect most people physiologically? Does it increase physical responses associated with stress, anxiety or trauma? Does long-term stress or trauma dement people? So, does constantly reminding others they'll be punished for wrongdoing have the effect of dismantling their intellectual capacity? (In Harry Potter, prison guards are Dementors, who intensely impact the highly aware, brave-hearted hero. How much does that metaphor apply in real life?) How much does focusing on bad help people focus mostly on the good, which some people call God? Does it enable the good to flourish as much as possible? Don’t people who want to protect children (and adults) want scientific data to know who and what hurts their brains? Don’t they want to know who and what really serves the good the most?
Monday, November 22, 2010 5:19:39 PM