"IQ" vs. Standardized Tests

"When Wechsler was developing his IQ test, he found that out of 105 tests assessing skills in solving maze-puzzles,

involving the most heterogeneous populations throughout the world,

99 showed an incontrovertible male superiority.

(Wechsler resolved this type of problem by eliminating all those tests

that resulted in findings of significant sex differences.)"Leonardo_member@newsguy.com in 9miftl0239r@drn.newsguy.com

So the IQs of men and women were "equalized" by throwing out 94% of the test? How important is this?  Worldwide, with rare exceptions, annual incomes increase an average of $2,000 for each one point increase in IQ, with Japanese men at the top (with an IQ greater than 110 and annual income greater than $110,200) and black women in Africa at the bottom (with an IQ less than 55 and annual income less than $200).  The IQ gap between Asian men and Asian women when correlated with GRE scores is 19 points, when correlated with SAT math scores is 14 points, TIMSS physics scores is 17 points, PISA math scores at 15 years old is 10 points, ACT math scores is 19 points, IAEP math scores is 12 points, and NAEP 12th grade math scores is 10 points.  The IQ gap between sexes for all other races is similar, and by comparison the IQ gap between the US (at 98) and Mexico (at 87) is only 11 points which represents an annual income gap of $22,000 ($4,870 in Mexico, $26,870 in the US)

Take five minutes to complete the Poll on Exiling Blacks

"Psychiatrists and psychologists are likely to use the definition contained in the DSM-IV-TR, the manual used to make diagnostic judgments. Here mental retardation is defined as 1) an IQ of approximately 70 or below, 2) concurrent deficits or impairments in present adaptive functioning in two areas (communication, self-care, home-living, social/interpersonal skills, the use of community resources, self-direction, functional academic skills, work, leisure, health, and safety), 3) onset before age 18."

By this definition, HALF of African Blacks, and perhaps three quarters of American Blacks, are Retarded

 

There are 5,940,000 female and 4,861,000 male students in our undergraduate schools, and if the math skills of these girls follows the pattern of the Howard Wainer study, then 2,678,940 girls have math skills equivalent to boys who flunk out of math, 1,799,820 have math skills equivalent to boys who get D's, and 1,455,300 have math skills equivalent to boys who get C's.

None of them have math skills which would qualify them to follow a career in STEMS, while more than half of the 5,940,000 boys who were rejected (or 2,970,000 of them) to make room for these girl students, WOULD have benefited from a career in STEMS.

Why would we as a society do this at a time when high tech careers are so valuable, and so profitable? It's like cutting our nose off to spite our face. f you ever wondered why we can't make our own shoes, much less our own semiconductors and electronics, and instead must go all the way to China to have them made for us, then now you know why.

Math tests simply present mathematical facts to students to measure how well they can solve problems, and cannot be designed to "discriminate against" women, Blacks, Hispanics, nor Asians (particularly Asian men who score higher than the so-called privileged White men). The fact that 51% of college boys can solve
problems ( and thus get A's and B's in college math) which no girls can solve, not even those who get A's in college math, means just that--no American girl can solve problems that at least half of American boys have proven on SAT math tests that they CAN solve. All math problems are representative of how well a citizen can solve problems at school, at work, in science, in politics, and in life.

What's the effect of this invidious discrimination against our boys?  If all of the 5,940,000 boys who had been denied admission to make room for this many girls, had instead been accepted, we would now have 10,801,000 boys in college, and at least half of them, or 5,400,500 boys who CAN solve math problems, would be in our undergraduate schools where they CAN benefit from an undergraduate education. This is 122% more than the current figure of 2,430,500 students who DO understand math.

 

 

 

You have a fifty percent chance of scoring higher than the mean.

You have one chance out of six of scoring one standard deviation higher than the mean.

You have one chance out of 44 of scoring two standard deviations higher than the mean.

You have one chance out of 714 of scoring three standard deviations higher than the mean.

You have one chance out of 31,546 of scoring four standard deviations higher than the mean.

You have one chance out of 3,333,333 of scoring five standard deviations higher than the mean.

You have one chance out of 506,797,346 of scoring six standard deviations higher than the mean.

You have one chance out of 3,506,800,000 of scoring seven standard deviations higher than the mean.

You have one chance out of one quadrillion of scoring 8 standard deviations higher than the mean.

 

One Standard Deviation is 3.7 IQ Points

In 2007, in TIMSS math, 4,972 students from Hong Kong scored 584, with a Standard Deviation of 68, which is 9.5 SD higher than the 5,101 students from Ghana who scored 261.

http://timss.bc.edu/timss2007/intl_reports.html 

According to Professor Lynn, Ghana has an IQ of 71, which is 35 IQ points lower than Hong Kong at 106.

Thus 35 IQ points = 9.5 SD, statistical proof that the actual SD for IQ scores is 1SD = 3.7 IQ points.

This means that the 106 - 64 = 42 point gap between Hong Kong and Senegal is 11.4 SD, whereas a Sengalese has one chance out of 506,797,346 of scoring only 5 standard deviations higher than the mean for Senegal of 64, which is an IQ of only 106, not 137.

For a Senegalese to have an IQ of 137, he would have to score TWENTY STANDARD DEVIATIONS higher than the average of 64 for Senegal.

This is pure math. We don't need to engage in character assassination against Senegal to make this point.

Another way to look at this is Exhibit 2.2 on pg. 71 which shows that NONE of the students in Botswana or Ghana (nor even Northern Africa, in Algeria, and Morocco) scored higher than 550, compared to 71% in Taipei, Korea, or Singapore, 61% in Hong Kong and Japan, and half in Massachusetts:

http://timss.bc.edu/timss2007/PDF/TIMSS2007_InternationalMathematicsReport.pdf

Needless to say, none in Africa scored higher than 625 compared to almost half in Taipei, Korea, and Singapore, and one third in Japan and Hong Kong.

625 equals an IQ of 106 so any claim of a Senegalese to have an IQ of 137 is 4.2 SD higher than Japan, an IQ that NONE of the Japanese students exhibited.

We know that the real serious education in most Asian nations starts AFTER the 8th Grade, which is the grade tested by both PISA and TIMSS and what the above standard deviation calculations are based on. Since no Asian nation has participated in any of the 12th grade tests as we have. Both the race and gender gaps get much bigger between 8th and 12th grade.

American Blacks go BACKWARDS between 8th and 12th grade, and yet we already know that on IAEP at the 8th grade level, Blacks in D.C. score one standard deviation lower than Mozambique.

One Standard  Deviation = 3.1 IQ Points

On TIMSS Math in 2003, the Netherlands, with an average IQ of 103, scored 540, and South Africa, with an average IQ of 72, scored 264. Since the standard deviation for TIMSS  scores was 55, this 276 point gap is 10.0 standard deviations. And since this 10.0 standard deviations is equivalent to a 31 point gap in IQ scores, the standard deviation for IQ scores is 31 / 10 or 3.1 IQ points.

540 - 264 = 276

/ (55 /2) = 10.04

103 - 72 = 31

31 / 10.04 = 3.1

 

Why Does Italy Score Closer to Kenya Than to The Netherlands?

A correlation between the Beaton Gonzalez IAEP and NAEP crosslink study, with Lynn's latest IQ data, shows a correlation of r-squared = 0.8 right out of the box. Once his IQ numbers are adjusted to achieve an r-squared = 1.0 [read : perfect correlation], here are the major adjustments which must be made:

Switzerland from 101 to 103
Hungary from 99 to 102
France from 98 to 99
Ireland from 93 to 96
Italy from 102 to 98
Slovenia from 95 to 94
Spain from 99 to 92
Jordan from 87 to 80
Israel from 94 to 80
South Africa from 72 to 76
Mozambique from 72 to 70
DC Blacks from 85 to 68

All other IAEP and NAEP scores fit perfectly with Lynn's estimates for IQ.

There are two apparent outliers which must be carefully evaluated:

1) Ireland now ranks 7th in PISA reading, and scores around 25 points higher than us in math, AND science, AND reading, which is a 3 IQ point advantage. So if Ireland really does have an IQ of 93, then he must think the US has an IQ of 90. If he's right about the 15 IQ point gap between Protestants and Catholics in Ireland, and if the above correlation which puts Ireland's IQ at 96 is correct, then he must think that Protestants there have an IQ of 104 and Catholics have an IQ of 89?

2) While Italian 8th graders exhibited an IQ of 98 (four points lower than Lynn's estimate), their 8th graders scored 48 TIMSS points lower than Iran, who Lynn estimates to have an IQ of 84. This would suggest that their IQ is 78, which is 24 points lower than Lynn.


2008 12th Grade TIMSS Advanced Math Scores

Russia = 561

Netherlands = 552

Lebanon = 545

Iran = 497

Italy = 449

Armenia = 433

Philippines = 355

This is not an anomaly. This happens in all Catholic countries. Compared to boys in the 8th grade, boys in the 12th grade scored this much lower in these Catholic countries:

Austria 82 points
Czech Republic 58 points
France 72 points
Canada 28 points

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IF IQ scores follow a perfect Gaussian Distribution, and if Professor Lynn's estimate of IQ is anywhere close to accurate, then the following is a straight calculation of the maximum number of people with an IQ higher than 115:

Japan = 19,990,562
Korea = 7,932,763
Germany = 7,121,000
US = 7,052,546
Netherlands = 2,601,946
Singapore = 842,777
Catholics in US = 77,000
Whites in DC = 44,000
Israel = 11,200 [w caveats]
Blacks in US = 1,141
India [per Lynn] = 84,121
India [per PISA] = 390
Kenya = 0

And this is a straight calculation for the maximum number with an IQ higher than 145:

Japan = 3,994
Korea = 1,585
Germany = 48,900
US = 93
Netherlands = 520
Singapore = 325
Catholics in US = 8
Whites in DC = 168
Israel = 0 [w caveats]
Blacks in US = 0
India [per Lynn] = 0
India [per PISA] = 0
Kenya = 0

 

 

Close Correlation Between IQ and Income

Country PP income CIA factbook Lynn IQ Lynn IQ Adjusted for Linearity Amount of IQ Adjustment
10,000 105 140 35
Japan 8,702 101 131 30
Luxumbourg 4,665 101 105 4
Switzerland 3,883 93 100 7
Ireland 3870 102 100 -2
Netherlands 3,817 98 100 2
US 3500 107 98 -9
Hong Kong 3369 102 97 -5
Germany 3352 98 97 -1
France 3,004 102 94 -8
Italy 2,801 99 93 -6
Spain 1,533 84 84 0
Puerto Rico 839 93 80 -13
Chile 682 87 78 -9
Mexico 131 83 75 -8
Egypt 79 81 75 -6
India 68 72 75 3
Kenya 55 71 75 4
Ghana 52 89 75 -14
Cambodia 10 59 74 15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


From India With Love

 

"My own 'IQ'. Though I do not buy the 'IQ' story's claims, I HAVE taken various 'IQ' tests: my scores have ranged between 135 to 175"

Even if your IQ was as high as 100, you'd be able to do the math which shows that NOBODY in India could possibly have an IQ of 175.

Why not? Very simple.

But let me do the math for you, just in case.

The average IQ of India is 72 [according to multiple standardized tests, not Professor Lynn's estimate], which means that one sixth of India's population [actually 203.2 million Indians] have an iQ higher than one standard deviation higher than 72 [or 82].

25.4 million have an IQ higher than 92, which is 2 SD.

1.778 million have an IQ higher than 102, the AVERAGE for Europe, which is 3 SD.

40,259 have an IQ higher than 112, the AVERAGE for Hong Kong, which is 4 SD.

381 have an IQ higher than 122, which is 5 SD

Nobody in India has an IQ higher than 125, which is 1 SD LOWER than the LOWEST OF YOUR estimate of 135.

YOU have one chance out of 391 BILLION of having an IQ of 142, or 7 SD.

You have LESS than one chance out of one QUADRILLION of having an IQ of 152, or 8 SD.

If you had even the SMALLEST brain in your skull, you would KNOW that Your casual and UTTERLY RIDICULOUS claim of having an IQ 175, TEN STANDARD DEVIATIONS HIGHER [10 SD] than the average for India, is less than laughable.

It would be less ridiculous to claim that you are 1,000 feet tall (and it seems only your ego is that tall).

AND this is based on India following the normal Gaussian Distribution which PISA just proved it does NOT follow. ZERO percent of the students in Rajasthan scored higher than 625 which is an IQ of only 125, AND that only the top 30% of Indians go to high school, AND that this school didn't even meet the international sampling requirements, meaning the average for all of India is another standard deviation LOWER.


bullet

The correlation between IQ and race

bullet

Explained: the 216 Point Gap in SAT Math Scores--Catholics 433, Protestants 649

bullet

Other racial differences

bullet

The vast intellectual differences between the sexes

bullet

The exceptionally low IQ of jews

bullet

The fixed relationship between IQ and brain size

bullet

The correlation between brain size and standardized test scores

bullet

Twin studies proves IQ is inherited

bullet

Distribution curves between boys and girls on the GRE

bullet

Roger Roots on black IQ

bullet

Differences between boys and girls

bullet

Other observations about blacks

bullet

Distribution curves between blacks and Whites

bullet

Why does Africa remain a continent of pagans?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It's IQ Tests Which Show the Greatest Overlap Between Races and Sexes

IQ Scores With Standard Deviation of 15% x2

 

 

 

 

IQ Scores With Standard Deviation of 15%

 

 

 

 

 

IQ Scores With Standard Deviation of 10%

 

 

 

 

 

Standard Deviation for PISA Math is 16% of the Math Score

 

 

 

As Expected, Income and IQ are Related 

 

 

Standard Deviation for Brain Size is 2.4% of It's Actual Measured Size in Cubic Centimeters

 

Standard Deviation for Incomes is 7% of the Amount of the Income

 

 

 

 

 

Average Height Also Shows a Much Different Pattern than IQ Scores

Even the Most Optimum Graph of IQ Scores (SD =5) Shows More Overlap than Height, Brain Size or Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

GRE Scores Track Perfectly With IQ

 

 

 

Group1 Mean GRE Quantitative Score Lynn IQ Adjusted
American Indian 479 75
Men 511 83
Women 459 70
Asian/Pacific 598 106
Men 638 116
Women 572 99
Black/African 416 58
Men 446 65
Women 404 55
Mexican American 475 73
Men 517 84
Women 451 67
Puerto Rican 471 74
Men 504 82
Women 448 66
Other Hispanic 495 79
Men 543 91
Women 469 72
White 540 90
Men 586 103
Women 514 84
Other 541 90
Men 583 102
Women 509 83

 

 

The Historic, Proven, Half-century, Race/Sex Gap

There are many people, including our academicians, including even White men, who claim or believe that standardized test scores are not indicative of IQ in spite of voluminous data to the contrary.  These are the same people who whine "racist", "anti-semite", "sexist", if we simply point out that they are wrong and standardized tests are right, thus deflecting any criticism of their error.

Students and industry and universities and colleges don't spend billions of dollars annually to measure this aptitude, though, if it was not important to them.  Whether or not we ever agree that this aptitude IS IQ is irrelevant--for the last half century, it reveals a consistent pattern, it shows the gap between races AND sexes is increasing, and it suggests that American blacks now score lower than [read: have lower IQs than] blacks in their own homelands.

In order to avoid this charge of racism, we WHITE men make the following comparisons between Asian men in Asia and the U.S., and women of other races, including Asian women.

 

Asian Men vs Black Women Mexican Women Indian Women White Women Asian Women
NAEP 64 56 43 25 14
IAEP 122 121 101 42 9
ACT x 20 126 86 78 10 4
SAT 161 133 113 68 34
GRE 258 212 199 140 72
TIMSS 274 222 199 62 17

Please don't view this smaller gap in GRE scores than in TIMSS scores for black women (258 vs. 274) to be representative of all blacks in the US, because this was the select few who made it through college and are now hoping to enter graduate school and thus are a very select group of blacks.  Also note that even though White men represent as much as 95% of those who score in the region most desirous to industry and education, women were 55% of college admissions, so the highest scoring White men are not even represented in ACT, SAT, nor GRE scores.

In order to be able to compare ACT scores with other scores, they were multiplied by 20, and only then do they show exactly the same pattern as all other tests.  In TIMSS, Korean boys (even though they scored 27 points lower than boys in Singapore, 615 vs. 642), were compared to White girls in Switzerland (representative of Whites), girls in Portugal (representative of Indians), girls in Colombia (representative of Hispanics), and girls in South Africa (representative of blacks).  Also, in IAEP, Korean boys were used as the baseline, with girls in Switzerland representing Whites, girls in Brazil representing Hispanics, and girls in Mozambique (who scored unusually high for an African nation) representative of Blacks.

 

Professor Lynn's IQ of Nations

Professor Lynn's excellent list of the iq's of 186 nations has been updated and confirmed based on the PISA scores from their 2006 international study, as well as from the 2003 TIMSS study.  Based solely on PISA, the biggest increases in IQ scores that we see are  11 points for Azerbaijan, 8 points for Ireland, 7 points for Canada and Croatia, and 6 points for Australia and Estonia, and the biggest decreases are 10 points for Argentina and Kyrgyzstan, 6 points for Italy, and 4 points for Uruguay and Romania.  Based on TIMSS, Malaysia's IQ is 6 points higher than his estimate, Iran and Tunisia are 4 points higher, while Chile's is 8 points lower, Italy's is 6 points lower, Norway's is 5 points lower, and Japan's, Belgium's, Sweden's are 4 points lower.

Based only on these two studies, there are only four countries which really stick out:  Italy's actual IQ appears 6 points lower than his estimate, Chile's appears 3-8 points lower, Japan's appears 1-4 points lower, whereas Russia's appears 2 points higher.

According to TIMSS, Hong Kong is 105 rather than his estimate of 107, but PISA places it at 107.  South Korea is 1 point higher according to PISA, but exactly what he estimated on TIMSS, 106.  The Netherlands is 3 points higher according to PISA, but 2 points lower according to TIMSS, putting his estimate of 102 right in the middle.  According to PISA, Azerbaijan is 11 points higher, Ireland is 8 points higher, Canada and Croatia are 7 points higher, Estonia is 6 points higher, Switzerland and Greece are 4 points higher, Belgium and Latvia are 3 points higher, France and Lithuania are 2 points higher, Poland is 1 point higher, Argentina and Kyrgyzstan are 10 points lower, Luxembourg and Uruguay are 4 points lower, but they are all right on according to TIMSS, providing triple confirmation of Professor Lynn's data.

 

TIMSS vs. IQ

The huge gender gap between all races of all 46 nations but one (Israel) in all TIMSS subjects, particularly physics (an EXTREMELY important skill in this day and age of the technological society) proves that the theory that men and women have "equal IQs" is wrong. Correlating these scores with Professor Lynn's "IQ of Nations" produces the following graph:

 

There's no reason to believe that actual White women and White men in the US don't have IQ's equivalent to the many European nations in this subject (101 and 113 respectively), nor that Asian men and women don't have IQ's equivalent to Japan (103 and 118 respectively).  There's also no reason to believe that Hispanic women and Hispanic men in the US don't have IQ's equivalent to Mexico (81 and 93 respectively). The VERY low scores in ALL the international tests Israel has ever participated in suggest that Professor Lynn's estimate of 94 is way too high for jews.  And there's no reason whatsoever to believe that American blacks, no matter how much gene flow there might have been from Caucasoids, is the 85 which is so highly touted by the "news" media.  With two dozen African nations having IQ's lower than 70, we'd have to believe that it was the most intelligent Africans who where taken into slavery to believe that they now have IQs 15 points higher. 

Furthermore, the above assumptions would mean that the average IQ of the U.S. is 101.6 rather than the 98 estimated by Professor Lynn:

 

Race/sex black women black men jew women jew men Hispanic women Hispanic men White women White men Asian women Asian men Total
% Population 6.50% 6.50% 1% 1% 5% 5% 36.00% 36.00% 2% 2% 100.00%
IQ 77 85 94 94 81 93 101 113 103 118  
Proportion 5.005 5.525 0.47 0.47 4.05 4.65 36.36 40.68 2.06 2.36 101.6

 

 

What does fit the curve is when blacks are assumed to have an IQ equivalent to their brethren in Africa, the gap between black women and black men is assumed to be only 6 points as their close scores in SAT and GRE suggest (rather than 13 points like Norway), jews are assumed to have an IQ which is equivalent to their 446 score in TIMSS, the gap between sexes in Israel is assumed to be zero as girls in Israel score higher than boys, and that 72% of Americans are Whites with IQs equivalent to Norway.  The fact that Whites in Iowa score 154 SAT points higher than the national average for "whites" as reported by the College Board proves this to be the case, and produces the following:

 

Race/sex black women black men jew women jew men Hispanic women Hispanic men White women White men Asian women Asian men Total
% Population 6.50% 6.50% 1% 1% 5% 5% 36% 36% 2% 2% 100%
IQ 51 59 70 70 81 93 101 113 103 118  
Proportion 3.315 3.835 0.35 0.35 4.05 4.65 36 40.68 2.06 2.36 98.0

 

horizontal rule

 

Even Alcohol Consumption per Capita Tracks IQ Perfectly

In ounces of alcohol per capita per year, IQs increase one IQ point for each 3 ounces increase in alcohol consumption.

 

And Of Course IQ Tracks Traffic Safety

Each One Point Increase in IQ Saves 9 Lives per 100,000 Motor Vehicles

 

horizontal rule

 

IQs for 185 countries

http://www.rlynn.co.uk
http://www.rlynn.co.uk/pages/article_intelligence/t4.htm

"National IQs Based on the Results of Intelligence Tests and Estimated
National IQs (marked by *) Based on the IQs of Neighbouring or Other Comparable
Countries.

"Note: IQ purists say anything within a four point range is considered the
same or comparable", Professor Lynn

Country - National IQ

 

 

Country Lynn IQ Pisa 2006 Pisa IQ PISA Adjust ment TIMSS 2003 TIMSS IQ TIMSS Adjus tment
  a.. Hong Kong  107 549 107 0 586 105 -2
  b.. Korea, South  106 547 107 1 589 106 0
  i.. Netherlands  102 531 105 3 536 100 -2
  l.. Switzerland  101 530 105 4   101
  ab.. Canada  97 527 104 7   97
  c.. Japan  105 523 104 -1 537 101 -4
  o.. New Zealand  100 522 104 4 494 96 -4
  m.. Belgium  100 520 103 3 537 100 0
  v.. Australia  98 520 104 6 505 97 -1
  ad.. Estonia  97 515 103 6   97
  g.. Germany  102 504 102 0   102
  ak.. Slovakia  96 504 101 5 508 98 2
  k.. Sweden  101 502 101 0 499 97 -4
Scotland       498   0
  ay.. Ireland  93 501 101 8   93
  u.. France  98 496 100 2   98
  q.. United Kingdom  100 495 100 0   100
  s.. Poland  99 495 100 1   99
  r.. Hungary  99 491 99 0 529 99 0
  j.. Luxembourg  101 490 100 -1   101
  z.. Norway  98 490 100 2 461 93 -5
  af.. Latvia  97 486 100 3 505 97 0
  ag.. Lithuania  97 486 99 2 502 97 0
  t.. Spain  99 480 99 0   99
  aj.. Russia  96 476 98 2 508 98 2
  bs.. Azerbaijan  87 476 98 11   87
  aa.. United States  98 474 98 0 504 97 -1
  bj.. Croatia  90 467 97 7   90
  aq.. Portugal  95 466 96 1   95
  h.. Italy  102 462 96 -6 484 96 -6
  be.. Greece  92 459 96 4   92
  as.. Israel  94 442 94 0 466* 92 -2
  am.. Uruguay  96 427 92 -4   96
  bl.. Turkey  90 424 91 1   90
  bh.. Thailand  91 417 91 0   91
  at.. Romania  94 415 90 -4 475 94 0
  aw.. Bulgaria  93 413 90 -3 476 94 1
  av.. Chile  93 411 90 -3 387 85 -8
  bx.. Mexico  87 406 89 2   87
  bn.. Indonesia  89 391 87 -2 411 88 -1
  bv.. Jordan  87 384 87 0 424 89 2
  ah.. Argentina  96 381 86 -10   96
  bq.. Colombia  88 370 85 -3   88
  da.. Tunisia  84 365 84 0 410 88 4
  ec.. Qatar  78 318 78 0   78
  bw.. Kyrgyzstan  87 311 77 -10   87
  d.. Korea, North  105   105   105
  e.. Taiwan  104   104   104
  f.. Austria  102   102   102
  n.. China  100   100   100
  p.. Singapore  100   100   100
  w.. Denmark  98   98   98
  x.. Iceland  98   98   98
  y.. Mongolia  98   98   98
  ac.. Czech Republic  97   97   97
  ae.. Finland  97   97   97
  ai.. Belarus  96   96   96
  al.. Ukraine  96   96   96
  an.. Vietnam  96   96   96
  ao.. Malta  95   95   95
  ap.. Moldova  95   95 460 93 -2
  ar.. Slovenia  95   95   95
  au.. Armenia  93   93   93
  ax.. Georgia  93   93   93
  az.. Kazakhstan  93   93   93
  ba.. Macedonia  93   93 435 90 -3
  bb.. Yugoslavia  93   93   93
  bc.. Brunei  92   92   92
  bd.. Cyprus  92   92 459 92 0
  bf.. Malaysia  92   92 508 98 6
  bg.. Costa Rica  91   91   91
  bi.. Albania  90   90   90
  bk.. Peru  90   90   90
  bm.. Cambodia  89   89   89
  bo.. Suriname  89   89   89
  bp.. Laos  89   89   89
  br.. Venezuela  88   88   88
  bt.. Brazil  87   87   87
  bu.. Iraq  87   87   87
  by.. Samoa (Western)  87   87   87
  bz.. Syria  87   87   87
  ca.. Tajikistan  87   87   87
  cb.. Tonga  87   87   87
  cc.. Turkmenistan  87   87   87
  cd.. Uzbekistan  87   87   87
  ce.. Burma (Myanmar)  86   86   86
  cf.. Philippines  86   86 378 84 -2
  cg.. Lebanon  86   86   86
  ch.. Bolivia  85   85   85
  ci.. Cuba  85   85   85
  cj.. Morocco  85   85   85
  ck.. Paraguay  85   85   85
  cl.. Algeria  84   84   84
  cm.. Dominican Republic  84   84   84
  cn.. El Salvador  84   84   84
  co.. Guyana  84   84   84
  cp.. Honduras  84   84   84
  cq.. Iran  84   84 411 88 4
  cr.. Kiribati  84   84   84
  cs.. Libya  84   84   84
  ct.. Marshall Islands  84   84   84
  cu.. Micronesia  84   84   84
  cv.. Nicaragua  84   84   84
  cw.. Panama  84   84   84
  cx.. Papua New Guinea  84   84   84
  cy.. Puerto Rico  84   84   84
  cz.. Solomon Islands  84   84   84
  db.. Vanuatu  84   84   84
  dc.. Afghanistan  83   83   83
  dd.. Bahrain  83   83   83
  de.. Belize  83   83   83
  df.. Egypt  83   83   83
  dg.. Kuwait  83   83   83
  dh.. Oman  83   83   83
  di.. Saudi Arabia  83   83   83
  dj.. United Arab Emirates  83   83   83
  dk.. Yemen  83   83   83
  dl.. Bangladesh  81   81   81
  dm.. India, per Lynn 81   81   81
  dn.. Maldives  81   81   81
  do.. Mauritius  81   81   81
  dp.. Pakistan  81   81   81
  dq.. Seychelles  81   81   81
  dr.. Sri Lanka  81   81   81
  ds.. Ecuador  80   80   80
  dt.. Trinidad & Tobago  80   80   80
  du.. Comoros  79   79   79
  dv.. Guatemala  79   79   79
  dw.. Madagascar  79   79   79
  dx.. Barbados  78   78   78
  dy.. Bahamas  78   78   78
  dz.. Bhutan  78   78   78
  ea.. Cape Verde  78   78   78
  eb.. Nepal  78   78   78
  ed.. Zambia  77   77   77
  ee.. Antigua & Barbuda  75   75   75
  ef.. Grenada  75   75   75
  eg.. Dominica  75   75   75
  eh.. St. Kitts & Nevis  75   75   75
  ei.. St. Lucia  75   75   75
  ej.. St.Vincent/Grenadines  75   75   75
  ek.. Congo (Braz)  73   73   73
  el.. Mauritania  73   73   73
  em.. Uganda  73   73   73
  en.. Botswana  72   72   72
  eo.. Chad  72   72   72
  ep.. Haiti  72   72   72
  eq.. Jamaica  72   72   72
  er.. Kenya  72   72   72
  es.. Lesotho  72   72   72
  et.. Mosambique  72   72   72
  eu.. Namibia  72   72   72
  ev.. South Africa  72   72 264 72 0
  ew.. Swaziland  72   72   72
  ex.. Sudan  72   72   72
  ey.. Tanzania  72   72   72
  ez.. C?te d'Ivoire  71   71   71
  fa.. Ghana  71   71   71
  fb.. Malawi  71   71   71
  fc.. Burundi  70   70   70
  fd.. Cameroon  70   70   70
  fe.. Rwanda  70   70   70
  ff.. Angola  69   69   69
  fg.. Benin  69   69   69
  fh.. Togo  69   69   69
  fi.. Central African Rep.  68   68   68
  fj.. Djibouti  68   68   68
  fk.. Eritrea  68   68   68
  fl.. Mali  68   68   68
  fm.. Somalia  68   68   68
  fn.. Niger  67   67   67
  fo.. Nigeria  67   67   67
  fp.. Burkina Faso  66   66   66
  fq.. Gabon  66   66   66
  fr.. Zimbabwe  66   66   66
  fs.. Congo (Zaire)  65   65   65
  ft.. Gambia  64   64   64
  fu.. Liberia  64   64   64
  fv.. Senegal  64   64   64
  fw.. Sierra Leone  64   64   64
  fx.. Ethiopia  63   63   63
  fy.. Guinea  63   63   63
  fz.. Guinea Bissau 63   63   63
India, per PISA 63            
  ga.. Sao Tome/Principe  59   59   59
  gb.. Equatorial Guinea  59   59   59

 

Country Lynn IQ
  a.. Hong Kong 107
  b.. Korea, South 106
  i.. Netherlands 102
  l.. Switzerland 101
  ab.. Canada 97
  c.. Japan 105
  o.. New Zealand 100
  m.. Belgium 100
  v.. Australia 98
  ad.. Estonia 97
  g.. Germany 102
  ak.. Slovakia 96
  k.. Sweden 101
Scotland
  ay.. Ireland 93
  u.. France 98
  q.. United Kingdom 100
  s.. Poland 99
  r.. Hungary 99
  j.. Luxembourg 101
  z.. Norway 98
  af.. Latvia 97
  ag.. Lithuania 97
  t.. Spain 99
  aj.. Russia 96
  bs.. Azerbaijan 87
  aa.. United States 98
  bj.. Croatia 90
  aq.. Portugal 95
  h.. Italy 102
  be.. Greece 92
  as.. Israel 94
  am.. Uruguay 96
  bl.. Turkey 90
  bh.. Thailand 91
  at.. Romania 94
  aw.. Bulgaria 93
  av.. Chile 93
  bx.. Mexico 87
  bn.. Indonesia 89
  bv.. Jordan 87
  ah.. Argentina 96
  bq.. Colombia 88
  da.. Tunisia 84
  ec.. Qatar 78
  bw.. Kyrgyzstan 87
  d.. Korea, North 105
  e.. Taiwan 104
  f.. Austria 102
  n.. China 100
  p.. Singapore 100
  w.. Denmark 98
  x.. Iceland 98
  y.. Mongolia 98
  ac.. Czech Republic 97
  ae.. Finland 97
  ai.. Belarus 96
  al.. Ukraine 96
  an.. Vietnam 96
  ao.. Malta 95
  ap.. Moldova 95
  ar.. Slovenia 95
  au.. Armenia 93
  ax.. Georgia 93
  az.. Kazakhstan 93
  ba.. Macedonia 93
  bb.. Yugoslavia 93
  bc.. Brunei 92
  bd.. Cyprus 92
  bf.. Malaysia 92
  bg.. Costa Rica 91
  bi.. Albania 90
  bk.. Peru 90
  bm.. Cambodia 89
  bo.. Suriname 89
  bp.. Laos 89
  br.. Venezuela 88
  bt.. Brazil 87
  bu.. Iraq 87
  by.. Samoa (Western) 87
  bz.. Syria 87
  ca.. Tajikistan 87
  cb.. Tonga 87
  cc.. Turkmenistan 87
  cd.. Uzbekistan 87
  ce.. Burma (Myanmar) 86
  cf.. Philippines 86
  cg.. Lebanon 86
  ch.. Bolivia 85
  ci.. Cuba 85
  cj.. Morocco 85
  ck.. Paraguay 85
  cl.. Algeria 84
  cm.. Dominican Republic 84
  cn.. El Salvador 84
  co.. Guyana 84
  cp.. Honduras 84
  cq.. Iran 84
  cr.. Kiribati 84
  cs.. Libya 84
  ct.. Marshall Islands 84
  cu.. Micronesia 84
  cv.. Nicaragua 84
  cw.. Panama 84
  cx.. Papua New Guinea 84
  cy.. Puerto Rico 84
  cz.. Solomon Islands 84
  db.. Vanuatu 84
  dc.. Afghanistan 83
  dd.. Bahrain 83
  de.. Belize 83
  df.. Egypt 83
  dg.. Kuwait 83
  dh.. Oman 83
  di.. Saudi Arabia 83
  dj.. United Arab Emirates 83
  dk.. Yemen 83
  dl.. Bangladesh 81
  dm.. India 81
  dn.. Maldives 81
  do.. Mauritius 81
  dp.. Pakistan 81
  dq.. Seychelles 81
  dr.. Sri Lanka 81
  ds.. Ecuador 80
  dt.. Trinidad & Tobago 80
  du.. Comoros 79
  dv.. Guatemala 79
  dw.. Madagascar 79
  dx.. Barbados 78
  dy.. Bahamas 78
  dz.. Bhutan 78
  ea.. Cape Verde 78
  eb.. Nepal 78
  ed.. Zambia 77
  ee.. Antigua & Barbuda 75
  ef.. Grenada 75
  eg.. Dominica 75
  eh.. St. Kitts & Nevis 75
  ei.. St. Lucia 75
  ej.. St.Vincent/Grenadines 75
  ek.. Congo (Braz) 73
  el.. Mauritania 73
  em.. Uganda 73
  en.. Botswana 72
  eo.. Chad 72
  ep.. Haiti 72
  eq.. Jamaica 72
  er.. Kenya 72
  es.. Lesotho 72
  et.. Mosambique 72
  eu.. Namibia 72
  ev.. South Africa 72
  ew.. Swaziland 72
  ex.. Sudan 72
  ey.. Tanzania 72
  ez.. C?te d'Ivoire 71
  fa.. Ghana 71
  fb.. Malawi 71
  fc.. Burundi 70
  fd.. Cameroon 70
  fe.. Rwanda 70
  ff.. Angola 69
  fg.. Benin 69
  fh.. Togo 69
  fi.. Central African Rep. 68
  fj.. Djibouti 68
  fk.. Eritrea 68
  fl.. Mali 68
  fm.. Somalia 68
  fn.. Niger 67
  fo.. Nigeria 67
  fp.. Burkina Faso 66
  fq.. Gabon 66
  fr.. Zimbabwe 66
  fs.. Congo (Zaire) 65
  ft.. Gambia 64
  fu.. Liberia 64
  fv.. Senegal 64
  fw.. Sierra Leone 64
  fx.. Ethiopia 63
  fy.. Guinea 63
  fz.. Guinea Bissau 63
  ga.. Sao Tome/Principe 59
  gb.. Equatorial Guinea 59

76 IQ of American blacks

 

 

What's interesting on the following table is:

1) First generation Turks who were born and educated in Germany scored no higher, but no lower, than their home country of Turkey.

2) At 105, Japan, Bavaria, Singapore, Taiwan, and Hong Kong scored the highest.

3) The highest scoring states scored 4 points lower than them.


[quote]
http://www.volkmar-weiss.de/table.html

I like the fact the US, Canada, Italy, Spain, and Germany were broken down into states/provinces/regions. It would have been grand if the same had been done for other nations. I would suggest looking at the link instead. They have the PISA scores converted to IQ in bold there so it's easier on the eyes.

The PISA 2006 data (mean birth year of the subjects was 1991) on the mathematical scale are transformed into IQ in such a way that IQ 100 is the mean of the UK, the Netherlands and New Zealand (i.e. IQ 100 corresponds to a PISA score of 516). This seems to be a justified method of calibration because the mean IQ of the UK shows a downward trend, the IQ of the Netherlands seems to be nearly constant and New Zealand's trend is upward. The original mean of these three countries in the first book by Lynn and Vanhanen (2002) was IQ 100.

Read the following data in this way: Finland IQ 97/101 (107/105), this means: Finland mean IQ given by Lynn and Vanhanen (2002) 97, by Rindermann (2007) 101 (from his adjusted value IQ 103 always subtracted 2, because the "Greenwich-IQ" of UK in his data is 102); PISA-IQ 2003 107, PISA IQ 2006 105.

Afghanistan IQ 83/76
Albania IQ 90/81 (78/-)
Algeria IQ 84/75
Angola IQ 69/58
Antigua and Barbuda IQ 75/60
Argentina IQ 96/87 (83/80)
Armenia IQ 93/90
Australia IQ 98/99 (104/101) Aborigines (92) Non-Aborigines (105)
Austria IQ 102/99 (101/98) Immigrants (13% of total population) of first generation (92) of second one
born and educated in Austria (93)
Azerbaijan IQ 87/79 (-/94)
Bahamas IQ 78/76
Bahrain IQ 83/85
Bangladesh IQ 81/73
Barbados IQ 78/77
Belarus IQ 96/90
Belgium IQ 100/98 (104/101) German speaking part (102/100) Flemish Flanders (108/104) French speaking Wallonia (100/96)
Belize IQ 83/74
Benin IQ 69/60
Bermuda IQ -/88
Bhutan IQ 78/71
Bolivia IQ 85/85
Bosnia IQ -/82
Botswana IQ 72/73
Brazil IQ 87/82 (78/78)
Brunei IQ 92/84
Bulgaria IQ 93/94 (87/85)
Burkina Faso IQ 67/58
Burma IQ 86/79
Burundi IQ 70/59
Cambodia IQ 89/84
Cameroon IQ 70/59
Canada IQ 97/100 (105/102) Alberta (107) British Columbia (106) Manitoba (104) Newfoundland (103) New Brunswick (102) Nova Scotia (102) Ontario (104) Prince Edward Island (100) Quebec (106) Saskatchewan (102)
Cape Verde IQ 78/67
Central African Republic IQ 68/59
Chad IQ 72/58
Chile IQ 93/87 (83/84)
China IQ 100/105
Colombia IQ 89/78 (-/78)
Comoros IQ 79/68
Congo (Brazzaville) IQ 73/59
Congo (Zaire) IQ 65/60
Costa Rica IQ 91/81
Croatia IQ 90/88 (-/93)
Cuba IQ 85/82
Cyprus IQ 92/94
Czech Republic IQ 97/98 (102/99)
Denmark IQ 98/97 (102/100)
Djibouti IQ 68/58
Dominica IQ 75/62
Dominican Republic IQ 84/79
Ecuador IQ 80/86
Egypt IQ 83/82
El Salvador IQ 84/71
Equatorial Guinea IQ 59/53
Eritrea IQ 68/58
Estonia IQ 97/97 (-/100)
Ethiopia IQ 63/59
Fiji IQ 84/82
Finland IQ 97/101 (107/105) Finns (107/105) Swedish minority (105/102)
France IQ 98/98 (102/97)
Gabon IQ 66/53
Gambia IQ 65/55
Georgia IQ 93/87
Germany IQ 102/97 (100/98) Immigrants from Turkey descendants of first generation
born and educated in Germany (86) PISA 2000/PISA 2003: Baden-Wuerttemberg (102/101) Bavaria (102/104) Berlin (-/98) Brandenburg (96/98) Bremen (93/95) Hamburg (-/97) Hesse (98/99) Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (98/99) Lower Saxony (97/99) North Rhine-Westphalia (97/97) Rhineland-Palatinat (98/99) Saarland (98/99) Saxony (100/103) Saxony-Anhalt (97/100) Schleswig-Holstein (99/99) Thuringia (99/101)
Ghana IQ 71/62
Greece IQ 92/95 (92/91)
Grenada IQ 75/61
Guatemala IQ 79/76
Guinea IQ 66/62
Guinea-Bissau IQ 66/57
Guayana IQ 84/79
Haiti IQ 72/57
Honduras IQ 84/78
Hongkong IQ 107/104 (107/105)
Hungary IQ 99/98 (99/96)
Iceland IQ 98/99 (102/99)
India IQ 81/79
Indonesia IQ 89/84 (79/81)
Iran IQ 84/83
Iraq IQ 87/85
Ireland IQ 93/96 (100/99)
Israel IQ 94/94 (96/89)
Italy IQ 102/99 (95/92) Basilicata (-/89) Bozen/South Tyrol (-/100) Campania (-/87) Emilia Romagna (-/97) Friuli-Venezia Giulia (-/100) Liguria (-/93) Lombardy (103/96) Piedmont (99/96) Puglia (-/88) Sardinia (-/87) Sicily (-/86) Trient (-/99) Tuscany (99/-) Veneto (102/99)
Ivory Coast IQ 71/-
Jamaica 72/67
Japan IQ 105/103 (105/101)
Jordan IQ 87/88 (-/80)
Kazakhstan IQ 93/87
Kenya IQ 72/68
Kiribati IQ 84/77
Korea (North) IQ 104/100
Korea (South) IQ 106/104 (106/105)
Kuwait IQ 83/81
Kyrgyzystan IQ 87/82 (-/69)
Laos IQ 89/87
Latvia IQ 97/96 (97/96)
Lebanon IQ 86/82
Lesotho IQ 72/57
Liberia IQ 65/57
Libya IQ 84/75
Liechtenstein -/97 (105/101)
Lithuania IQ 97/92 (-/96)
Luxembourg IQ 101/97 (99/96)
Macau -/97 (104/101)
Macedonia IQ 93/86 (80/-)
Madagascar IQ 79/79
Malawi IQ 71/59
Malaysia IQ 92/95
Maldives IQ 81/72
Mali IQ 69/59
Malta IQ 95/96
Marianas IQ -/78
Marshall Islands IQ 84/81
Mauritania IQ 74/67
Mauritius IQ 81/87
Mexico IQ 87/83 (83/84)
Micronesia IQ 84/76
Moldova IQ 95/92
Mongolia IQ 98/95
Montenegro (-/83)
Morocco IQ 85/75
Mozambique IQ 72/59
Namibia IQ 72/60
Nepal IQ 78/75
Netherlands IQ 102/100 (106/102)
New Caledonia IQ -/82
New Zealand IQ 100/99 (103/101) Whites (109) Maori (100)
Nicaragua IQ 84/72
Niger IQ 67/59
Nigeria IQ 67/73
Norway IQ 98/98 (99/96)
Oman IQ 83/75
Pakistan IQ 81/81
Panama IQ 85/76
Papua New Guinea IQ 84/80
Paraguay IQ 85/81
Peru IQ 90/79 (76/-)
Philippines IQ 86/83
Poland IQ 99/97 (99/97)
Portugal IQ 95/93 (95/93)
Puerto Rico IQ 84/81
Qatar IQ 78/75 (-/70)
Romania IQ 94/91 (-/85)
Russia IQ 96/97 (95/94)
Rwanda IQ 70/60
Saint Kitts and Nevis IQ 75/57
Saint Lucia IQ 75/57
Saint Vincent/Grenadines IQ 75/67
Samoa (Western) IQ 87/86
Sao Tome/Principe IQ 59/57
Saudi Arabia IQ 83/80
Senegal IQ 65/55
Serbia IQ 93/89 (with Montenegro 90/without 88)
Seychelles IQ 81/78
Sierra Leone IQ 64/59
Singapore IQ 103/105
Slovakia IQ 96/97 (101/96)
Slovenia IQ 95/97 (-/98)
Solomon Islands IQ 84/76
Somalia IQ 84/58
South Africa IQ 72/64
Spain IQ 97/96 (98/95) Andalusia (-/92) Aragon (-/100) Asturias (-/97) Basque Country (100/98) Cantabria (-/98) Castile-Leon (100/100) Catalonia (99/96) Galicia (-/97) La Roja (-/101) Navarre (-/100)
Sri Lanka IQ 81/76
Sudan IQ 72/67
Suriname IQ 89/87
Swaziland IQ 72/58
Sweden IQ 101/99 (101/98)
Switzerland IQ 101/99 (104/102) German Swiss (106) French Swiss (104) Ticino (102)
Syria IQ 87/82
Taiwan IQ 104/106 (-/105)
Tajikistan IQ 87/79
Tanzania IQ 72/68
Thailand -/89 (87/85)
Timor-Leste IQ -/60
Togo IQ 69/60
Tonga IQ 87/84
Trinidad and Tobago IQ 80/91
Tunisia IQ 84/83 (79/77)
Turkey IQ 90/86 (88/86)
Turkmenistan IQ 87/79
Uganda IQ 73/69
Ukraine IQ 96/90
United Arab Emirates IQ 83/76
United Kingdom IQ 100/100 (in 2000 IQ 104
no representative sampling in 2003/in 2006 IQ 97)) England (-/97) Northern Ireland (102/97) Scotland (104/99) Wales (100/95)
United States of America IQ 98/98 (97/94) IQ averages in US States (in the following the arithmetic means of these estimates from SAT and ACT scores by Van Sloan and the NAEP derived scores published by M. A. McDaniel: Intelligence 34 (2006) p. 612
corrected by minus 3 to an average of IQ 97: Alabama IQ 94
Alaska IQ 97
Arizona IQ 96
Arkansas IQ 95
California IQ 95
Colorado IQ 99
Connecticut IQ 100
Delaware IQ 97
Florida IQ 95
Georgia IQ 95
Hawaii IQ 95
Idaho IQ 98
Illinois IQ 98
Indiana IQ 98
Iowa IQ 100
Kansas IQ 100
Kentucky IQ 95
Louisiana IQ 93
Maine IQ 99
Maryland IQ 98
Massachusetts IQ 101
Michigan IQ 98
Minnesota IQ 100
Mississippi IQ 91
Missouri IQ 98
Montana IQ 100
Nebraska IQ 99
Nevada IQ 96
New Hampshire IQ 101
New Jersey IQ 99
New Mexico IQ 93
New York IQ 98
North Carolina IQ 96
North Dacota IQ 100
Ohio IQ 99
Oklahoma IQ 98
Oregon IQ 99. Pennsylvania IQ 98
Rhode Island IQ 97
South Carolina IQ 93
South Dacota IQ 99
Tennessee IQ 95
Texas IQ 96
Utah IQ 98
Vermont IQ 100
Virginia IQ 98
Washington IQ 99
West Virginia IQ 97
Wisconsin IQ 100
Wyoming IQ 99)

Uruguay IQ 96/90 (87/87)
Uzbekistan IQ 87/79
Vanuatu IQ 84/76
Venezuela IQ 89/83
Vietnam IQ 96/93
Yemen IQ 83/73
Zambia IQ 77/67
Zimbabwe IQ 66/71
[unquote]

[begin quote]

 

The SAT verbal section correlates with traditional IQ tests at .8, which, at that correlation (only IQ tests correlate with each other at that level), makes the SAT verbal section nothing less than an IQ test. The GRE verbal section is harder than the SAT verbal section; it�s reasonable to think that the GRE verbal section correlates just as well with traditional IQ tests.

However, the SAT quantitative section correlates with traditional IQ tests at no more than .7, which makes it a weaker measure of intelligence (though it still is pretty good). The GRE quantitative section is much easier than the SAT quantitative section. So it�s reasonable to think that the GRE quantitative section correlates even less than .7 with traditional IQ tests.

The moral of the story is that the GRE Verbal section is a great measure of intelligence for those who are native, or non-native, well-versed, English speakers.

So I scoured the high IQ societies and found that a number actually accept the GRE verbal section by itself. The ISI-Society does so with two points: a 790 verbal score is equivalent to a 148 IQ, and a 700 verbal score is equivalent to a 137 IQ (assuming SD is 15). I�m taking these two point from this one society for the internal consistency. My third point comes from the verbal score average�historically about 470�corresponding to a college graduate average IQ of 105. Having more points would be better, but this will work for now.

My slope is 0.13531211750306, and my intercept is 41.5960832313339. We can round them to .135, and 41.596. The resulting equation is IQ = .135*Verbal + 41.596. The following is a incomplete chart; the decimal places don�t imply greater accuracy:

800 +148

790 148

780 147.139534883721

770 145.78641370869

760 144.43329253366

750 143.080171358629

740 141.727050183599

730 140.373929008568

720 139.020807833537

710 137.667686658507

700 137

690 134.961444308446

680 133.608323133415

670 132.255201958384

660 130.902080783354

650 129.548959608323

640 128.195838433293

630 126.842717258262

620 125.489596083231

610 124.136474908201

600 122.78335373317

I would advise anyone using this chart to drop the decimal points. For example, if you scored a 630 verbal score, then take your IQ to be roughly 126 and neither a 126.8 nor 127.

 

 

[end quote]

25 African nations have average IQs lower than 70, which means that American psychiatrists must label them as retarded according to DSM-IV-TR.  More than 80 African nations have IQ's lower than 84.  The average of the lowest 24 is 66, and the average of the entire 84 is 74, so at best the IQ of blacks brought to the Americas as slaves was 70.  IF the IQ of the offspring of mixed race parents is a simple average, and since American blacks have 20% Caucasian genes whose ancestor's IQs were around 100, THEN we'd expect American blacks to have an average IQ of 76 (borderline retarded according to Seligman).  BUT, IAEP scores of mostly black cities like Washington, DC, Detroit, New Orleans, and Gary, Indiana, have consistently been lower than Mozambique with an IQ of 72. By this definition, one sixth of India's population of 1.27 billion, or 212 million [the fastest growing demographic group there], are retarded.

India's fastest growing export is retarded Indians.

Koko the Gorilla's IQ was 85, making her a more qualified candidate for "president" than Obama even IF he's at the high end of the curve--which he clearly is NOT!

 

Wechsler Travesty

Did the "liberals" in education [read: jews] achieve their goal of establishing racial and "gender" "equality" by using only 6% of the "IQ" test questions to measure "IQ", and then widely publicize  that "men and women have equal IQs"?  If Gallup's poll on "gender issues" is any indication, then it's been a raving success:  29% of men and 43% of women believe women are more intelligent than men, and 40% of both men and women believe they are of "equal intelligence".  Are they correct, or are the 28% of men and 14% of women who believe men are more intelligent correct?

It's a major moral dilemma for this putative Christian nation, one that prides itself on truth, honesty, and Christian charity, that there's no hard scientific or statistical evidence to support the beliefs of almost three quarters of American men and 6 out of 7 of American women that women are "equally" or more intelligent than men. 

After more than a decade of research, this author is familiar with only two tests on which females outperformed males in intelligence, and that's a small advantage 9 and 13 year old girls have over boys on the math portion of the politically motivated National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) test, and the verbal portion of the equally politically biased American College Testing (ACT) test.  By age 17 years, though, boys outperform girls by a very large margin on NAEP, there are no other tests which duplicate the results of the verbal portion of ACT, and boys outperform girls by very wide margins on all the other ACT tests (math, rhetorical skills, algebra, reading, social studies, arts/literature, science reasoning, natural science, and composite).  There's no section of the TIMSS test on which girls ever outperformed boys, and their scores were so low on TIMSS physics that their responses were statistically significant on only 45% of the test, and they scored lower than if they'd just guessed at the answers on the rest.  Boys outperform girls by wide margins on both the verbal and math sections of the SAT.

This difference between men and women in academic skills carries over to free enterprise where a very exhaustive Census Bureau study highlights the four fold advantage men have over women in critical thinking, decision skills, earning ability, corporate management, people skills:

bulletAdding women to the ownership of a man owned business reduces its potential receipts by $323,300 or 55.5%. 
bulletAdding men to the ownership of a woman owned business increases its potential receipts by $108,100 or 71.5%. 
bulletCompletely removing women from ownership increases potential receipts by $431,400 or 3.9X relative to a woman owned business where men are not owners.

Unless "intelligence" is something that can't be measured, and unless all who believe men aren't more intelligent than women accept as a fact an entity that can't be quantified or measured or proven, then it simply cannot be correct that women are more than or equally intelligent to men.  Thus, 6 out of 7 American women and three quarters of American men hold a belief that cannot be substantiated by any facts, proof that the brainwashing of our students has been a remarkable success.

The other evidence of the remarkable success of this brainwashing is the fact that this page has been on the internet for more than a decade in one form or another--and in all that time not one single woman, even those claiming to be PhD's, asked one single logical question about:

  1. Why there's a four fold difference between men and women in these skills.

  2. If there's anything that can be done to improve American education (for either boys or girls--or both).

  3. How this highlights affirmative action's destructive effects when competent White men are displaced by incompetent black women.

  4. Whether or not there may be a specific flaw in the data, the tests, or the way the tests are conducted or reported.

  5. How it might be possible for an entire group to score lower on a standardized test than if they'd just guessed at all the answers.

  6. And, most importantly, how so many 12th grade girls could exhibit zero mathematical and calculation skills.

Instead, virtually every input from a girl or woman has been an emotional tirade which attempted to discredit the messenger rather than understand that their equality boat has a great big hole in it and has already sunk.  The usual charge is "you must really hate women", which belies this author's role in creating and organizing standardized tests, administering and funding them, collating the results, and publishing the test scores.  If this author "hates women", then consider how much MORE the federal and state governments around the world who paid for, administered, tested, and publicized the results of so many different tests, must "hate women".  All this author has done is peek at the test results and put them on a few web pages.

Biased jew-controlled businesses like the Gallup Organization present their data in such a distorted fashion that it is difficult to sort it all out.  Almost all standardized tests (with the exception of TIMSS which did report Israel's scores separately) exclude jews as a separate race.  Feminazis would not view it as "sexist" or "racist" or "anti-semitic" to merely note the significant differences in intelligence by race and sex, and particularly by race and sex of jews, had this brainwashing not been a raving success.

TIMSS, where Israel (which is mostly if not all jews) scored a mere 466 in TIMSS math, provides an excellent opportunity to fill in the gaps caused by Wechsler's distortion of his "IQ tests", Gallup's biased polling strategy, and the failure of almost all news sources to separate the data by race and sex.  SAT math scores by race and sex are correlated with TIMSS math scores by race and sex to establish that jew boys score 458 in SAT Math, jew girls score 438, and in TIMSS, Asian boys in the US score 614, Asian girls in the US score 580, Caucasian boys score 573, Caucasian girls score 538, etc.  This is consistent with the very low test scores of Miami-Dade, Florida which has such a high population of jews that the main boulevard is now called "Yitzahk Rabin Blvd".

sattimss.gif (25819 bytes)

This correlation can then be used to establish an "actual" IQ which more accurately reflects the race and sex differences shown by all these standardized tests, as well as cranial capacity, than do the Wechsler and other "IQ tests" which have removed the major portion that tests for intelligence:

iqsat.gif (27410 bytes)

iqtimss.gif (25055 bytes)

To verify this Actual IQ score, the known racial and sex differences demonstrated by differences in the NAEP Math, ACT Math, and GRE (Graduate Record Exam) Quantitative scores are compared, showing remarkably high correlation (r-squared of 0.96, 0.94, and 0.95, respectively):

iqnaep.gif (25027 bytes)

iqact.gif (25447 bytes)

iqgre.gif (27560 bytes)

Now that we've established some level of confidence that this Actual IQ is an accurate and reliable measurement of the actual differences in intelligence, or at least in test performance, between races and sexes, the real challenge is to correlate this to brain size:

iqbrainsize.gif (26606 bytes)

The one outlier which throws r-squared off so much, to only 0.75, is the one for nigger boys with an average cranial capacity of 1,319, but who score only 78 in IQ, 445 in TIMSS Math, 431 in SAT Math, 17.4 in ACT Math, 247 in NAEP Math, and 446 in GRE Quantitative.  All of these scores suggest that nigger boys should have a brain capacity of 1,210 rather than 1,319, suggesting that the actual brain size measurement might be 9% too high.  The following is what the chart would look like if the cranial capacity of nigger boys were presumed to be 1210 rather than 1,319.  For more discussion on this detail, please click here.

iqbrainsizeadjusted.gif (27268 bytes)

 

In contrast to the above Actual IQ Score are the Wechsler and Lynn IQ scores which are not consistent with any known standardized tests, achieving at best an r-squared of 0.45:

iqlynnwechsler.gif (27715 bytes)

Race & Sex

Brain Size IQ

Lynn, Wechsler IQ

PISA IQ

Asian Boys

118

106

111

Caucasian Boys

108

102

110

Asian Girls

110

106

105

Nigger Boys

78

70

77

Indian Boys

95

95

93

Mexican Boys

90

92

90

Caucasian Girls

100

102

100

jew boys

85

115

86

Mexican Girls

80

92

82

jew girls

80

115

84

Indian Girls

87

95

87

Nigger Girls

75

70

74

Where Lynn and Wechsler estimate the IQ of both jew boys and jew girls to be 115, their performance in TIMSS puts jew boys at 85 and jew girls at 80, and where they put Asian boys at 106, TIMSS puts them at 118.   Similarly, they overestimate Mexican boys by 2 points, Mexican girls by 12 points, Caucasian girls by 2 points, Indian girls by 8 points, and they underestimate Caucasian boys by 6 points, nigger boys by 8 points, and nigger girls by 5 points.

Such a bias is consistent with the obvious, pervasive, and systemic bias of government reports, outrageous media disinformation, and other politically correct persons who almost have heart attacks when someone says "jew boy", "nigger", or "chink" (and perhaps this report will be updated with respect to the name of the Asian classification. Correlating their estimates with brain size produces the following graph with an r-squared of 0.745:

 

 

 

Race & Sex Brain Size TIMSS Math SAT Math ACT Math NAEP Math GRE Quanti tative Pub lished IQ Adjust ed IQ Adjust
ment
Asian Boys 1,472 614 592 24.4 289 638 118 112 -6
Caucasian Boys 1,416 573 551 22.4 286 586 108 105 -3
Asian Girls 1,358 580 558 22.2 279 572 110 97 -13
Nigger Boys 1,319 445 431 17.4 247 446 78 92 14
Indian Boys 1,317 518 498 19 268 525 95 92 -3
Mexican Boys 1,306 496 476 19.4 255 517 90 91 1
Caucasian Girls 1,304 538 517 20 276 514 100 91 -9
jew boys 1,253 476 458 18.3 252 465 85 84 -1
Mexican Girls 1,250 455 438 18.4 245 451 80 84 4
jew girls 1,243 456 438 17.5 247 443 80 83 3
Indian Girls 1,217 483 466 18 258 462 87 80 -7
Nigger Girls 1,217 436 421 16.4 237 404 75 80 5

 

If IQ and brain size correlate precisely, which it might (but this is not proof that it does), then we would expect to see something like the following, which requires the reduction of IQs of:

bullet

 Asian boys by 6 points, from 118 to 112.

bullet

 Caucasian boys by 3 points from 108 to 105.

bullet

Asian girls by 13 points from 110 to 97.

bullet

Indian boys by 3 points from 95 to 92.

bullet

Caucasian girls by 9 points from 100 to 91.

bullet

jew boys by 1 point from 85 to 84.

bullet

Indian girls by 7 points from 87 to 80.

 

It also requires an increase in IQs of:

bullet

Nigger boys by 14 points from 78 to 92.

bullet

Mexican boys by 1 point from 90 to 91.

bullet

Mexican girls by 4 points from 80 to 84.

bullet

jew girls by 3 points from 80 to 83.

bullet

Nigger girls by 5 points from 75 to 80.

 

It also requires that the gender gap between Asian boys and Asian girls be 15 IQ points, with Caucasians to be 14 points, with Indians to be 12 points, with Mexicans to be 7 points, and with jews to be 1 point.

Arthur Hu's IQ Spectrum

"What IS open to question is whether the tests measure innate, unchangeable abilities. As this chart shows, there are groups with average or better performance out there. However almost every conventional race based intervention in education does not result in equal performance. Only programs based on rigorous academics such as Barclay, and not race such as; conventional desegregation, busing students to expensive surburbs or affirmative action in hiring and multiculturalism in curriculum have been shown to result in superior performance."

 

The following IQ Spectrum has not been corrected for the erroneous IQ data reported by jews like Wechsler and one of the authors of The Bell Curve, but it has been enhanced with data from the SAT and NAEP, by state, sex, and race to demonstrate the relationship between IQs and standardized test scores.  This enables the following cross-state, cross-sex, and cross-race comparison to be made between IQ, SAT Math scores, SAT Verbal scores, and NAEP Math scores.

Ethnic Group IQ Source 1990 SAT Verbal 1990 SAT Math NAEP Math
Sao Tome, Equatorial Guinea 59 Professor Lynn      
Blacks, District of Columbia < 70 NAEP Crosslink, Beaton     204
U.S. Blacks < 70 IAEP/NAEP Crosslink     209
Two dozen black African nations < 70

Professor Lynn

     
District of Columbia   NAEP Crosslink, Beaton     231.4
Borderline Retarded 70-75 IQ - Seligman p.151 ? 267 ?
Black Delinquents 74 Shuey p. 498 ? ? ?
Africans (Africa) 75 Lynn as cited by Murray p. 288 ? 302 ?
Southern Black children 80.5 Shuey ? ? ?
White Delinquents 81 Shuey p. 498 ? 347 ?
Black Felons 81 Shuey p. 498 ? 347 ?
Black Females 82 Interpolated from SAT estimate 346 377 ?
Black Average 85 IQ Seligman p.149 351 385 ?
Colored From Africa 85 Lynn as cited by Murray p. 288 ? ? ?
Dull-Normal 80-90 IQ Textbook by Wechsler ? ? ?
Jordan 87 NAEP Crosslink, Lynn     236.1
Border Black Children 87 Shuey, and SAT Tables, 1991 356 393 ?
Northern Black Children 87.6 Shuey, and SAT Tables, 1991 356 393 ?
Black G12 NAEP Math 89 (7) ? ? ?
Black US Northern Average 90 IQ Jensen(4) ? 415 ?
Koko the Gorilla 85-95 IQ Seattle Pacific magazine(1) ? ? ?
Urban North Black 91.1 Shuey ? ? ?
Hisp G12 NAEP Math 92 (7) 379 430 ?
White Felons 92 Shey p. 498 ? ? ?
White Chronic Welfare 92 Murray ? ? ?
Overall Criminals 92 Murray ? ? ?
Black Calif Math CLAS 92 A.Hu estimate (6) ? ? ?
South Carolina Public Schools NAEP Table 1.6 395 437 261
Malays 96 Lynn 1977 (Seligman) ? 460 ?
White American Girls 96 SAT Tables, 1991 436 464 ?
Black Reading CLAS 96 A.Hu estimate (6) ? ? ?
White Unwed - No Welfare 98 Murray ? ? ?
California Public Schools NAEP Table 1.6 482 263
Mixed Child of Black 100 Murray p. 310 (5) ? ? ?
Black Children Boston, NYC 100 See note ? ? ?
Adopted Asian Children 100 Sandra Scarr ? ? ?
American Students 100 Cattell's culture Fair Test ? ? ?
British 100 Lynn 1977 (Seligman) ? ? ?
Average Intelligence 90-109 IQ Textbook by Wechsler ? ? ?
Mainland China 101 Lynn (Seligman) ? ? ?
White CLAS Reading & Math 100 A.Hu set by definition (6) 447 489 ?
Flynn's Asian Studies 100 ?? ? ? ?
Asian Calif CLAS Math 102 A.Hu (7) ? 504 ?
White G12 NAEP math 102 (7), and SAT Tables, 1991 446 514 ?
British Children 102 IQ Lynn & Song 1994 ? ? ?
Malnourished Korean Adult 102 Winick, Meyer and Harris 1975 (2) ? ? ?
Asian Average 103-4 Murray 405 521 ?
South Carolina Non-public Schools NAEP Math, Table 1.6 525 283
Korean (est) 105 IQ Lynn & Song 1994 ? 528 ?
Moderately-nourished Adult Korean 106 (2)Winick, Meyer and Harris 1975 ? 536 ?
Chinese Hong Kong 106 IQ Chan & Lynn 1989 ? ? ?
Chinese Hong Kong 106.7 Lynn 1982 (Seligman) ? ? ?
Japanese 9 Year Olds 107 IQ Shigehisa & Lynn 1991 ? ? ?
White American Boys 542 ?
Korean 108.5 IQ Lynn & song 1994 ? ? ?
Asian G12 NAEP math 109 (7) ? 559 ?
Korean Children in Korea 109 IQ Lynn & Song 1994 ? ? ?
Italian 8th Graders 109 IAEP/NAEP Crosslink ? ? 280
Chinese Hong Kong 109.8 Lynn 1982 (Seligman) vs. British 100 Raven's matrices ? 566 ?
Bright-Normal 110-119 IQ Textbook Wechseler ? ? ?
Korean Adults in Belgium 110 Frydman & Lynn 1989 ? ? ?
Adopted Black Children 110 Sandra Scarr ? ? ?
Chinese 110 Lynn 1977 (Seligman) ? ? ?
Well Nourished Korean Adult 112 Winick, Meyer and Harris 1975 (2) ? 581 ?
North Dakota Public Schools 112 SAT Table, 1991 and NAEP Math, Table 1.6 581 285
Jewish Boys 112.8 verbal Ann Arbor Institute (Seligman) ? ? ?
Orthodox Jewish Children (applying to Hebrew schools in 1950's) 114.9 Miles B. Storfer ? ? ?
Other Storfer Jews 110-115 Miles B. Storfer ? ? ?
Jews 115 Review of Bell Curve ? 603 ?
Blacks at UC Berkeley 115 A.Hu top 15% UC definition ? ? ?
Texas Non-public Schools 116 naepmath.pdf Table 1.6 605 301
Blacks in Math Program 116 Barclay school Baltimore MD ? 611 ?
Adopted White children 120 Sandra Scarr ? 641 ?
Blacks at MIT 120 A.Hu based on SAT 1985 ? ? ?
Whites at UC Berkeley 124 A.Hu top 5% top 1/3 of UC ? 671 ?
Superior 120-129 IQ Text Wechsleler ? ? ?
Above Superior 130 & above By Definition ? 715 ?
White/Asian MIT 138 A.Hu (top 0.5% of population) ? 771 ?

Notes:

(1) In many cases, conversions were made from SAT scores to an estimate of the US population based on percentile to IQ conversion.

(2) Koreans adopted by Americans, Winick, Meyer and Harris 1975

(3)American men = Asian women at visiospatial tasks (math) (Lynn / Seligman)

(4) Blacks in New York and Boston are equal to grade level in some grades, equal to 100 IQ by definition. Some schools that are mostly black in Chicago also perform at the 50th percentile.

(5) Study of children of mixed parents of European and Black soldiers found no difference

(6) A.Hu Converted 1995 CLAS distribution to IQ with white=100

(7) National Assessment of Educational Progress given to national cross-section of students, 1990

(8) "A better idea" The Economist Dec 2, 1995 p. 23 Barclay public school in Baltimore Md. emulates a tough private school to achieve 85 percentile math scores with 90% black students, 82% free lunch who previously were scoring 20-30 percentile. Superintendent was fired who had opposed "rich black man's curriculum" inappropriate for poor students.

(9) Flynn looked at studies that put Asian IQ higher and concluded that after you accounted for increases in IQ since the tests were "normalized", Asian IQs were actually no higher than whites might expected to be at the same time. However, he does not dispute that Asians still have superior academic performance in school, which is just as useful as having a high IQ.

This is my latest version -- Arthur Hu's "IQ Spectrum" -- http://www.halcyon.com/arthurhu/ 12422 107th Pl NE Kirkland WA 98034

Note that blacks are, as a group, generally below whites, but it is not difficult to find groups who score 100 average or far above under ideal conditions. Those who say that tests are invalid are implying that performance is equal when every test devised by man shows differences in skills such as vocabulary, abstract reasoning, and mathematics.

Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996

Here's something else you might find helpful - note Asian females have a gender gap, but its nearly erased by the racial gap for Asians.

1993 SAT Scores Ranked by Race and Gender (unpublished special tabulations, College Board)

559 Asian male
518 White male
512 Asian female (only 6 points below WM)
472 White female
451 Hispanic male
408 Hispanic female
400 Black male

arthurhu@halcyon.com

horizontal rule


wpe3.gif (47220 bytes)

Summary of references:

  1. http://fathersmanifesto.net/grebrainsize.htm

  2. http://fathersmanifesto.net/einstein.htm for why Einstein's brain cannot be trusted as a control sample

  3. http://fathersmanifesto.net/gallupsexdifference.htm for American opinion of intelligence by sex.

  4. http://fathersmanifesto.net/timssphysics.htm for the huge differences between the sexes in physics scores.

 

IQ