Brought to you by three decades of STUPID women "lawyers"
The evidence that American women file more false allegations against men for rape and sexual assault is more credible and better documented than the evidence which convicted as many as a million innocent men
If the data on this page is correct, in just one year, 51,431 women nationwide filed rape charges against men which are known to be false, while 15,562 men were CONVICTED of rape.
How many women were CONVICTED for equally felonious behavior? Zero, even though it is probable that as many as 87,000 of 92,000 charges of rape are false!
This is why 87,303 of 92,490 or 95% of allegations of rape in the US in 1991 have a high likelihood of being false
THE BALD, BARE FACTS
Survey results: 4 of 5 women believe a woman would tell a lie seriously enough to convict their husbands of a crime he didn't commit.
American men are accused of rape at a rate one thousand times greater than Greek, Italian or Japanese men.
Countries with victim compensation programs have rape allegation rates up to 24 times higher than countries without them.
Paul Craig Roberts: "My own investigations have led me to conclude that there are as many convictions based on false testimony as on real evidence. "
Barry Scheck: "... the number of exonerations [due to tests of DNA] far outnumbers the number of inclusions".
Eugene J. Kanin, Ph.D., "Regarding this study, 41% (n= 45) of the total disposed rape cases (n= 109) were officially declared false during this 9-year period, that is, by the complainant's admission that no rape had occurred and the charge, therefore, was false."
False allegations by women made American men one third of the men in the world behind bars.
Even though women constitute only five percent of the US prison population NONE of the ninety thousand women who are KNOWN by authorities to file false charges each year are prosecuted.
Experts like Charles McDowell assert that a false allegation of rape is as reprehensible as rape itself.
Microsoft gets a dose of "the world's finest justice system".
How the Hyde Amendment encourages false allegations of rape.
Robert Lile: consensual sex, or rape?
Maryland proposes the justice law.
The poor track record of female judges.
With one out of 1,678 allegations of rape being legitimate, our public servants are now so distracted by false allegations that a quarter of a million murderers continue to run free.
Feminists claim rape test is "dangerous".
The Wenatchee scandal!
The role of women's inability to comprehend abstract justice.
FLASH: the justice system is concealing its own crimes.
Darrell Scott points the gnarly finger of blame BACK at Congress.
Rapes are reported in the US at a RATE 1,000 times higher than Japan!
THE TRUE VICTIMS
Aleck J. Carpitcher still in prison: "With one exception, there is nothing anyone can do. Because the girl's recantation came after the 21-day limit, no judge, jury or appellate court is allowed to consider the new evidence. Only the governor can intervene by granting a pardon. Such moves are rare, and usually come only after lengthy investigations."
THE REAL CRIMINALS
A) From "Felony sentences in State Courts, 1988" by
Patrick A. Langan Ph.D and John M. Dawson -- Bureau of Justice Statistics of the US
Department of Justice:
Rape here is defined as forcible intercourse of any kind, including "forcible deviant behavior" "sodomy" and other crimes and does not include statutory rape or intercourse with someone factually or legally unable to give consent. Actual numbers are 1 conviction for 6 reports and 1 conviction for 3 arrests. I am marginally worried about these statistics as I know that this definition differs from the FBI definition which requires intercourse with a female and the FBI uniform crime statistics seem to be quoted for number reported but I doubt that this escaped the BJS.
B) Type of conviction
|Jury||Bench (judge)||Guilty Plea|
The only set of tables in which this is strikingly not the case is the sex of the offender. In both Murder and Robbery roughly 10% of the offenders are women, in rape only 1% are. Rape is also extraordinary in that a larger fraction of the sentence is served, rather more than 1/3.
C) DNA EVIDENCE PROVES ONE THIRD NOT GUILTY -- Per Newsweek (Jan. 11, 1993, p. 64, Kevin Krajik) the FBI tested the DNA evidence of men ALREADY convicted of rape and serving time (based mostly on verbal testimony from victims) and found that in ONE THIRD OF THE CASES the DNA evidence from the crime scene did not match the person convicted.
D) "In the F.B.I.'s Behavioral Science Unit's study on False Allegations conducted in 1983 of 556 rape investigations, a total of 220 of these reported rapes turned out to be false. Over one fourth of these 556 turned out to be hoaxes. And yet, some femi nists and rape counselors claim that only two percent of rape reports are false. This 220 is only the number proven to be false. The actual number is higher. Again facts are facts, no matter what rhetoric feminists or their allies try to concoct."
Of 92,490 rapes reported each year, there are 23,122 women who are admittedly guilty of lying, 23,122 women who are probably guilty of lying, 5,187 women whose testimony conflicts with scientific DNA testing, 5,187 men whose DNA does not match the evidence at the "crime" scene, 5,187 men whose DNA evidence did match but whose convictions must be reexamined because of the high rate of false convictions of those whose DNA did not match, and 5,187 probably guilty men, . The same standard of proof applied to women for filing known or suspect false police reports, as is applied to men for acts which are impossible to either prove or disprove as crimes, and imprisoning women at the same rate as men for equally as serious crimes, would result in five times as many women as men in prison each year -- 51,431 women versus 10,375 men.
Using this 'equality' criteria, we have PROOF that 51,431 women are felons, while we only suspect that 10,375 men are. Yet 15,562 men were imprisoned -- and NOT a single woman was! What does the most damage? A "date rape" perceived by hysterical feminists be a "violation" of a woman's rights, or a genuine false rape accusation which destroys a man's reputation, costs societ billions of dollars in tax dollars, and results in thousands of fase imprisonments? Does an apparently unwanted act of sex damage a woman more than a blatantly false charge of rape does a man? If a woman has no bruises or permanent physical injuries, and only believes she has been raped because she applied the new "feminist logic", then the most she can claim is some unverifiable psychological damage, at best, and 99% of the time she can get on with her life. But 28,309 women were known to have damaged a man worse than she could have been damaged had all the charges been true. The same standard of proof applied to women for filing false charges as is applied to men who are falsely convicted would reveal that 51,431 men are known to have been unnecessarily and permanently damaged by women.
The evidence is far from 'equal'. More evidence exists of the damage done by 51,431 women than the evidence that was available to convict 15,562 men. This evidence sits in police files while the police and the district attorneys and the judges do nothing . Charging and convicting possibly innocent men on such a massive scale while ignoring the role played by unscrupulous women encourages more of this behavior, trivializes the serious crime of rape, overburdens the 'system' with frivolous complaints, causes real rapes to be overlooked or ignored, and trivializes legitimate rape charges made by honest women.
This False Accusations
of Rape site owned by The Fathers' Manifesto.
[ Previous 5 Sites | Previous | Next | Next 5 Sites | Random Site | List Sites ]